Abstract

Instrumentation of bridge structures provides a stream of data representing operational structural response under loading. The authors define the term bridge signature as the expected response of a particular bridge under loading, as measured by different instruments. In this research, the authors propose a new method to develop and evaluate a bridge signature. The signature can be monitored over time and statistically evaluated to detect potential structural deterioration and damage. An instrumentation system was implemented on the Powder Mill Bridge in Barre, Massachusetts, as a research prototype for the development of a structural health monitoring (SHM) system. Heavy truck events due to daily traffic were collected using an automatic measurement system, which triggers above a given threshold of recorded strains. Using the measured strain data due to daily traffic, a bridge signature was created using nonparametric statistical techniques. Maximum experimental strain values from heavy truck events were used to establish a nonparametric probability distribution that describes the behavior of the undamaged bridge under normal operating conditions. Nonparametric prediction intervals were added to the bridge signature, which define where future distributions of strain data from the undamaged bridge should fall. To study the robustness of this method for use in damage detection, three damage scenarios were simulated using a calibrated finite-element model. Comparison of the prediction intervals of the undamaged bridge signature to the analytical damaged distributions showed that, for all three damage scenarios, the damaged distributions fell outside of those intervals, which indicates that this method can potentially identify the presence of structural damage. This study shows that the proposed method is robust and computationally efficient for operational bridge damage detection using only measured strain data from truck loadings.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the funding of bridge instrumentation provided by the National Science Foundation (NSF) Partnerships for Innovation Grant No. 0650258, and funding for continued system upgrades provided by FHWA Long-Term Bridge Performance Program (Federal Contract No. DTFH61-08-00005, Subaward No. 00004397). Thanks to MassDOT and the town of Barre for access to the Powder Mill Bridge on Vernon Avenue, and Fay Spofford & Thorndike for sharing the design drawings and calculations. Additionally, the authors thank Geocomp Corp. for providing and assisting with the installation of the on-site data acquisition system and for continued technical support. Finally, use of the calibrated finite-element model of the bridge, which was created by John Phelps, is appreciated.

References

Alampalli, S., and Lund, R. (2006). “Estimating fatigue life of bridge components using measured strains.” J. Bridge Eng., 725–736.
Cardini, A. J., and DeWolf, J. T. (2009). “Long-term structural health monitoring of a multi-girder steel composite bridge using strain data.” Struct. Health Monit., 8(1), 47–58.
Catbas, F., Zaurin, R., Gul, M., and Gokce, H. (2012). “Sensor networks, computer imaging, and unit influence lines for structural health monitoring: Case study for bridge load rating.” J. Bridge Eng., 662–670.
David, H. A. (1981). Order statistics, Wiley, New York.
Doebling, S., Farrar, C., Prime, M., and Shevits, D. (1996). “Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: A literature review.” Rep. No. LA-13070-MA, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM.
Efron, B., and Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap, Chapman & Hall, New York.
Farrar, C. R., and Worden, K. (2007). “An introduction to structural health monitoring.” Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 365(1851), 303–315.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2004). “National Bridge Inspections Standards Regulation (NBIS).” 〈www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/nbis.cfm〉 (Mar. 1, 2013).
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2010). “2010 Status of the nation’s highways, bridges, and transit: Conditions & performance.” 〈http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/2010cpr/〉 (Mar. 1, 2013).
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2011). “Traffic volume trends.” 〈www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/travel_monitoring/tvt.cfm〉 (Mar. 1, 2013).
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2012). “Deficient bridges by state and highway system.” 〈http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/deficient.cfm〉 (Mar. 1, 2013).
Lee, S.-K. (2012). “Current state of bridge deterioration in the U.S.—Part 2.” Mater. Perform., 51(2), 2–7.
Lu, P. (2008), “A statistical based damage detection approach for highway bridge structural health monitoring.” Ph.D. dissertation, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA.
Ni, Y. Q., Zhou, K. C., Chan, K. C., and Ko, J. M. (2008). “Modal flexibility analysis of cable-stayed Ting Kau Bridge for damage identification.” Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 23(3), 223–236.
NIST. (2012). “Quantitative techniques.” 〈http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/eda/section3/eda35.htm〉 (Mar. 1, 2013).
Olund, J., and DeWolf, J. (2007). “Passive structural health monitoring of Connecticut’s bridge infrastructure.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 330–339.
Orcesi, A. D., and Frangopol, D. M. (2010). “Inclusion of crawl tests and long-term health monitoring in bridge serviceability analysis.” J. Bridge Eng., 312–326.
Sanayei, M., Phelps, J. E., Sipple, J. D., Bell, E. S., and Brenner, B. R. (2012). “Instrumentation, nondestructive testing, and finite-element model updating for bridge evaluation using strain measurements.” J. Bridge Eng., 130–138.
Sartor, R. R., Culmo, M. P., and DeWolf, J. T. (1999). “Short-term strain monitoring of bridge structures.” J. Bridge Eng., 157–164.
Scianna, A. M., and Christenson, R. (2009). “Probabilistic structural health monitoring method applied to the bridge health monitoring benchmark problem.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2131, 92–97.
Vogel, R. M., and Fennessey, N. M. (1994). “Flow-duration curves. I: New interpretation and confidence intervals.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 485–504.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 19Issue 7July 2014

History

Received: Jun 19, 2013
Accepted: Dec 20, 2013
Published online: Jan 28, 2014
Discussion open until: Jun 28, 2014
Published in print: Jul 1, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Christopher W. Follen [email protected]
Former Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tufts Univ., Medford, MA 02155. E-mail: [email protected]
Masoud Sanayei, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tufts Univ., Medford, MA 02155 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Brian R. Brenner, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor of Practice, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tufts Univ., Medford, MA 02155; and Vice President, Fay Spofford & Thorndike, 5 Burlington Woods Dr., Burlington, MA 01803. E-mail: [email protected]
Richard M. Vogel, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tufts Univ., Medford, MA 02155. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share