Technical Papers
Oct 7, 2013

Seismic Fragility Analysis of Cable-Stayed Bridges Considering Different Sources of Uncertainties

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 19, Issue 4

Abstract

Seismic fragility analysis is a complex process involving different sources of uncertainties. In this paper, an alternative procedure for seismic fragility analysis based on the uniform design method (UD) is proposed. UD is used to generate a reasonable sample to build probabilistic seismic demand models (PSDMs), which are used to generate the fragility curves of a cable-stayed bridge. Sensitivity analyses of different uncertainties are carried out by comparison of the fragility curves for different components. It is concluded that (1) the UD method can consider different sources of uncertainties in fragility analysis with reasonable accuracy; (2) the bridge system is more fragile than any component of bridges; and (3) the damage probability of fragility considering uncertainty in the ground motion, geometry, and material is larger than that considering only the uncertainty in the ground motion.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China under Grant No. SLDRCE09-B-08, Kwang-Hua Fund for College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grants No. 51278376 and No. 90915011. The support is gratefully acknowledged. The authors thank Dr. Wei Kai for his valuable help.

References

Applied Technology Council (ATC). (1985). “Earthquake damage evaluation data for California.” Rep. ATC-13, Redwood City, CA.
Baker, J. W., and Cornell, C. A. (2006). “Vector-valued ground motion intensity measures for probabilistic seismic demand analysis.” PEER Rep. 2006/08, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
Barbato, M., Gu, Q., and Conte, J. P. (2010). “Probabilistic push-over analysis of structural and soil-structure systems.” J. Struct. Eng., 1330–1341.
Basoz, N., and Kiremidjian, A. (1999). “Development of empirical fragility curves for bridges.” Proc., 5th U.S. Conf. on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering, ASCE, New York.
Caetano, E., Cunha, A., and Taylor, C. A. (2000). “Investigation of dynamic cable-deck interaction in a physical model of a cable-stayed bridge: Part I modal analysis; Part II seismic response.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam., 29(4), 481–521.
Casciati, F., Cimellaro, G. P., and Domaneschi, M. (2008). “Seismic reliability of a cable-stayed bridge retrofitted with hysteretic devices.” Comput. Struct., 86(17–18), 1769–1781.
Chang, K. C., Mo, Y. L., Chen, C. C., Lai, L. C., and Chou, C. C. (2004). “Lessons learned from the damaged Chi-Lu cable-stayed bridge.” J. Bridge Eng., 343–352.
Choi, E., DesRoches, R., and Nielson, B. (2004). “Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zones.” Eng. Struct., 26(2), 187–199.
Cornell, A. C., Jalayer, F., and Hamburger, R. O. (2002). “Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency steel moment frame guidelines.” J. Struct. Eng., 526–533.
Data Processing System (DPS) 7.05 [Computer software]. Hangzhou, China, Hangzhou RuiFeng Information Technology.
Fang, K. T. (1980). “Experimental design by uniform distribution.” Acta Math. Appl. Sin., 3, 363–372.
Feng, Q. H. (2008). “Study on seismic vulnerability and risk probability analysis of super-large bridge.” Doctoral dissertation, Tongji Univ., Shanghai, China.
HAZUS-MH MR3 [Computer software]. FEMA, Washington, DC.
Hwang, H. H. M., and Jaw, J. W. (1990). “Probabilistic damage analysis of structures.” J. Struct. Eng., 1992–2007.
Kafali, C., and Grigoriu, M. (2007). “Seismic fragility analysis: Application to simple linear and nonlinear systems.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam., 36(13), 1885–1900.
Karim, K. R., and Yamazaki, F. (2001). “Effect of earthquake ground motions on fragility curves of highway bridge piers based on numerical simulation.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam., 30(12), 1839–1856.
Lagaros, N. D., Plevris, V., and Papadrakakis, M. (2010). “Neurocomputing strategies for solving reliability-robust design optimization problems.” Eng. Comput., 27(7), 819–840.
Liu, P. L., and Der Kiureghian, A. (1986). “Multivariate distribution models with prescribed marginal and covariance.” Probab. Eng. Mech., 1(2), 105–112.
Mackie, K.R., Stojadinović, B. (2007). “Performance-based seismic bridge design for damage and loss limits states.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam., 36(13), 1953–1971.
Mander, J. B., and Basoz, N. (1999). “Seismic fragility curve theory for highway bridges.” Proc., 5th U.S. Conf. on Earthquake Engineering (TCLEE), ASCE, Reston, VA, 31–40.
MATLAB 7 [Computer software]. Natick, MA, MathWorks.
McKenna, F., Fenves, G. L., and Scott, M. H. (2006). OpenSees [Computer software], Pacific Earthquake Engineering Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA. 〈http://opensees.berkeley.edu/〉 (Aug. 16, 2012).
Nielson, B. G., and DesRoches, R. (2007). “Seismic fragility methodology for highway bridges using a component level approach.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam., 36(6), 823–839.
Pacheco, B. M., Fujino, Y., and Sulekh, A. (1993). “Estimation curves for modal damping in stay cables with viscous damper.” J. Struct. Eng., 1961–1979.
Padgett, J. E., and DesRoches, R. (2008). “Methodology for the development of analytical fragility curves for retrofitted bridges.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam., 37(8), 1157–1174.
Padgett, J. E., Nielson, B. G., and DesRoches, R. (2008). “Selection of optimal intensity measures in probabilistic seismic demand models of highway bridge portfolios.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam., 37(5), 711–725.
Priestly, M. J. N., Seible, F., and Calvi, G. M. (1996). Seismic design and retrofit of bridges, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Ramamoorthy, S. K., Gardoni, P., and Bracci, J. M. (2006). “Probabilistic demand models and fragility curves for reinforced concrete frames.” J. Struct. Eng., 1563–1572.
Ren, W. X., Fang, S. E., and Deng, M. Y. (2011). “Response surface-based finite element mode updating using structural static response.” J. Eng. Mech., 248–257.
Ren, W. X., and Obata, M. (1999). “Elastic-plastic seismic behavior of long span cable-stayed bridges.” J. Bridge Eng., 194–203.
Shinozuka, M., Feng, M. Q., Kim, H., and Kim, S. (2000a). “Nonlinear static procedure for fragility curve development.” J. Eng. Mech., 1287–1295.
Shinozuka, M., Feng, M. Q., Lee, J., and Naanuma, T. (2000b). “Statistical analysis of fragility curves.” J. Eng. Mech., 1224–1231.
Tubaldi, E., Barbato, M., and Dall’Asta, A. (2012). “Influence of model parameter uncertainty on seismic transverse response and vulnerability of continuous steel-concrete composite bridges with dual load path.” J. Struct. Eng., 363–374.
Vamvatsikos, D., and Cornell, C. A. (2002). “Incremental dynamic analysis.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam., 31(3), 491–514.
Vamvatsikos, D., and Fragiadakis, M. (2010). “Incremental dynamic analysis for estimating seismic performance sensitivity and uncertainty.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam., 39(2), 1–16.
Wang, J., and Ghosn, M. (2006). “Hybrid data mining/genetic shredding algorithm for reliability assessment of structural systems.” J. Struct. Eng., 11–1460.
Wang, Y., and Fang, K. T. (1981). “A note on uniform distribution and experimental design.” Chin. Sci. Bull., 26(6), 485–489.
Yi, J. H., Kim, S. H., and Kushiyama, S. (2007). “PDF interpolation technique for seismic fragility analysis of bridges.” Eng. Struct., 29(7), 1312–1322.
Zhang, J., and Huo, Y. L. (2009). “Evaluating effectiveness and optimum design of isolation devices for highway bridges using the fragility function method.” Eng. Struct., 31(8), 1648–1660.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 19Issue 4April 2014

History

Received: Sep 21, 2012
Accepted: Oct 4, 2013
Published online: Oct 7, 2013
Published in print: Apr 1, 2014
Discussion open until: May 13, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Student, State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction on in Civil Engineering, Tongji Univ., Shanghai, P.R. China 200092. E-mail: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Bridge Engineering, College of Civil Engineering, Tongji Univ., Shanghai, P.R. China 200092. E-mail: [email protected]
Graduate Student, State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji Univ., Shanghai, P.R. China 200092. E-mail: [email protected]
Wancheng Yuan, Aff.M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji Univ., Shanghai, P.R. China 200092 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share