Technical Papers
May 14, 2012

Effects of Pounding and Skewness on Seismic Responses of Typical Multispan Highway Bridges Using the Fragility Function Method

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 18, Issue 6

Abstract

This paper uses the fragility function method to study the effects of pounding and skewness on the seismic behaviors of typical multispan RC highway bridges. Three-dimensional numerical models are built for typical three-span bridges in California that include nonlinear pier columns, distributed gap elements simulating pounding at both expansion joints and end abutments, and soil-structure interaction effects. The spatial differences of seismic excitations at various supports caused by varied soil profile properties and wave propagation effects, etc., are also included. As indicated by the nonlinear time history analyses using a large set of three-component earthquake ground motion records, fragility functions are derived and compared for bridges with various structural details, including the location of gaps, deck skew angle, and gap size. Although pounding causes significant local damage, the fragility functions show relatively moderate change in damage probability of the entire bridge. When pounding does not happen, skewed bridges outperform straight ones because of their coupled responses. For straight bridges, the pounding has a limited effect on bridge level damage and can be negligible. However, pounding results in increased damages of skewed bridges which aggravate with large skew angles. Using fragility functions, this paper clarifies the interactive roles of skewness and pounding for seismic damage probability of multispan highway bridges. These findings can provide valuable guidance for future bridge design.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center Lifelines program under Project Task No. 9C. The research used the ATS Hoffman2 cluster at University of California, Los Angeles, to conduct most of the numerical simulations presented in this paper. Dr. Yuchuan Tang provided the MATLAB program for computing the dynamic stiffness of shallow foundation.

References

AASHTO. (1998). Load and resistance factor design specifications for highway bridges, Washington, DC.
Baker, J. W., and Cornell, C. A. (2006). “Vector-valued ground motion intensity measures for probabilistic seismic demand analysis.” PEER Rep. 2006/08, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
Caltrans. (2001). Seismic design criteria: Design manual V1.2, California Dept. of Transportation, Sacramento, CA.
Chen, W.-F., and Duan, L. (2003). Bridge engineering: Seismic design, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Choi, E., DesRoches, R., and Nielson, B. (2004). “Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zones.” Eng. Structures, 26(2), 187–199.
Chouw, N., and Hao, H. (2005). “Study of SSI and non-uniform ground motion effect on pounding between bridge girders.” Soil. Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 25(7–10), 717–728.
Chouw, N., and Hao, H. (2008). “Significance of SSI and non-uniform near-fault ground motions in bridge response I: Effect on response with conventional expansion joint.” Eng. Structures, 30(1), 141–153.
DesRoches, R., and Muthukumar, S. (2002). “Effect of pounding and restrainers on seismic response of multiple-frame bridges.” J. Struct. Eng., 128(7), 860–869.
Dimitrakopoulos, E. G. (2011). “Seismic response analysis of skew bridges with pounding deck-abutment joints.” Eng. Structures, 33(3), 813–826.
Dimitrakopoulos, E. G., Makris, N., and Kappos, A. J. (2011). “Dimensional analysis of the earthquake-induced pounding between inelastic structures.” Bull. Earthquake Eng., 9(2), 561–579.
Federal Highway Administration (FHwA). (1996). “Seismic design of bridges: Design example No. 4—Three-span continous CIP concrete bridge.” FHWA-SA-97-009, Washington, DC.
FEMA. (1999). Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology, earthquake model: HAZUS99 user’s manual, Washington, DC.
Gazetas, G. (1991). “Formulas and charts for impedance of surface and embedded foundations.” J. Geotech. Engrg., 117(9), 1363–1381.
Guo, A., Li, Z., Li, H., and Ou, J. (2009). “Experimental and analytical study on pounding reduction of base-isolation highway bridges using MR dampers.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam., 38(11), 1307–1333.
Jankowski, R. (2005). “Nonlinear viscoelastic modeling of earthquake-induced structural pounding.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam., 34(6), 595–611.
Jankowski, R. (2006). “Pounding force response spectrum under earthquake excitation.” Eng. Structures, 28, 1149–1161.
Jankowski, R., Wilde, K., and Fujino, Y. (1998). “Pounding of superstructure segments in isolated elevated bridge during earthquakes.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam., 27(5), 487–502.
Kawashima, K., Takahashi, Y., Ge, H. B., Wu, Z. S., and Zhang, J. D. (2009). “Reconnaissance report on damage of bridges in 2008 Wenchuan, China, earthquake.” J. Earthquake Eng., 13(7), 965–996.
Kawashima, K., and Unjoh, S. (1996). “Impact of Hanshin/Awaji earthquake on seismic design and seismic strengthening of highway bridges.” J. Struct. Eng. Earthq. Eng., 13(2), 211–240.
Kim, S.-H., and Shinozuka, M. (2003). “Effects of seismically induced pounding at expansion joints of concrete bridges.” J. Eng. Mech., 129(11), 1225–1234.
Malhotra, P. K. (1998). “Dynamics of seismic pounding at expansion joints of concrete bridges.” J. Eng. Mech., 124(7), 794–802.
Maragakis, E. A., and Jennings, P. C. (1987). “Analytical models for the rigid body motions of skew bridges.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam., 15(8), 923–944.
Muthukumar, S., and DesRoches, R. (2005). “Effect of frame-restoring force characteristics on the pounding response of multiple-frame bridges.” Earthq. Spectra, 21(4), 1113–1135.
Muthukumar, S., and DesRoches, R. (2006). “A Hertz contact model with non-linear damping for pounding simulation.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam., 35(7), 811–828.
Mylonakis, G., Nikolaou, S., and Gazetas, G. (2006). “Footings under seismic loading: Analysis and design issues with emphasis on bridge foundation.” Soil. Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 26(9), 824–853.
Priestley, M. J. N., Seible, F., and Calvi, G. M. (1996). Seismic design and retrofit of bridges, Wiley, New York.
“Record P0372.” (2009). PEER Strong Motion Database, 〈http://peer.berkeley.edu/svbin/Detail?id=P0327〉 (Aug. 21, 2009).
Ruangrassamee, A., and Kawashima, K. (2001). “Relative displacement response spectra with pounding effect.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam., 30(10), 1511–1538.
Saadeghvaziri, M. A., and Yazdani-Motlagh, A. (2007). “Inelastic seismic response of stiffening systems and development of demand spectrum: Application to MSSS bridges.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam., 36(14), 2153–2169.
Saadeghvaziri, M. A., and Yazdani-Motlagh, A. (2008). “Seismic behavior and capacity/demand analyses of three multi-span simply supported bridges.” Eng. Structures, 30(1), 54–66.
Zanardo, G., Hao, H., and Modena, C. (2002). “Seismic response of multi-span simply supported bridges to a spatially varying earthquake ground motion.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam., 31(6), 1325–1345.
Zhang, J., and Huo, Y. (2009). “Evaluating effectiveness and optimum design of isolation devices for highway bridges using fragility function method.” Eng. Structures, 31(8), 1648–1660.
Zhang, J., Huo, Y., Brandenberg, S. J., and Kashighandi, P. (2008). “Effects of structural characterizations on fragility functions of bridges subject to seismic shaking and lateral spreading.” Earthquake Eng. Eng. Vib., 7(4), 369–382.
Zhang, J., and Makris, N. (2002a). “Kinematic response functions and dynamic stiffnesses of bridge embankments.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam., 31(11), 1933–1966.
Zhang, J., and Makris, N. (2002b). “Seismic response analysis of highway overcrossings including soil-structure interaction.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam., 31(11), 1967–1991.
Zhao, J., and Sritharan, S. (2007). “Modeling of strain penetration effects in fiber-based analysis of reinforced concrete structures.” ACI Struct. J., 104(2), 133–141.
Zhu, P., Abe, M., and Fujino, Y. (2002). “Modelling three-dimensional non-linear seismic performance of elevated bridges with emphasis on pounding of girders.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam., 31(11), 1891–1913.
Zhu, P., Abe, M., and Fujino, Y. (2004). “Evaluation of pounding countermeasures and serviceability of elevated bridges during seismic excitation using 3D modeling.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam., 33(5), 591–609.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 18Issue 6June 2013
Pages: 499 - 515

History

Received: Aug 15, 2011
Accepted: May 11, 2012
Published online: May 14, 2012
Published in print: Jun 1, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Software Research Engineer I, Bentley Systems Inc., 2744 Loker Ave. West, Suite 103, Carlsbad, CA 92010; formerly, Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095. E-mail: [email protected]
Jian Zhang, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share