Parametric Analysis of Cross-Frame Layout on Distortion-Induced Fatigue in Skewed Steel Bridges
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 18, Issue 7
Abstract
The effects of skew angle, cross-frame spacing, cross-frame layout, cross-frame stiffness, and load placement on the potential for distortion-induced fatigue damage in steel bridges was investigated by performing a suite of more than 1,000 analysis jobs of high-resolution three-dimensional finite-element models. Susceptibility to fatigue damage was quantified in terms of computed stress demand in the web gap region of the girders. Bridge configurations with three different cross-frame layouts were evaluated, including configurations with cross-frames placed parallel to skew angle (skewed-parallel) and perpendicular to the girder line, both staggered (skewed-staggered) and unstaggered (skewed-unstaggered). Skew angles of configurations evaluated ranged between 0 and 50°, and cross-frame spacing ranged from 2.29 to 9.14 m (7.50 to 30.0 ft). Influence and envelope surfaces were constructed to show the relationship between load placement, location of the maximum web gap stress, and the magnitude of the maximum web gap stress. It was found that maximum web gap stress always occurred when loads were positioned directly above the intersection of a cross-frame and girder web. The parametric study showed that cross-frame stiffness and spacing had a significant effect on the susceptibility to distortion-induced fatigue damage; greater cross-frame stiffness resulted in higher web gap stresses, and increased cross-frame spacing resulted in increased web gap stresses. It was also found that the bridge configuration was key to determining the location of the web gaps where damage is most likely to occur. In skewed-parallel and skewed-unstaggered layouts, maximum web gap stresses were identified in top web gaps, whereas in skewed-staggered configurations, maximum stresses occurred in bottom web gaps. It was found that in configurations with staggered cross-frames, maximum web gap stresses tended to occur in regions of support, where cross-frames are often placed back-to-back along the skewed alignment.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful for support from the Kansas DOT (KDOT) and the University of Kansas Transportation Research Institute (KU TRI). The authors also acknowledge support provided though Pooled Fund Study TPF-5(189), which includes the following participating State DOTs: Kansas, California, Iowa, Illinois, Louisiana, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Washington, Wisconsin, and Wyoming, as well as the Federal Highway Administration.
References
AASHTO. (2004). LRFD bridge design specifications, Washington, DC.
AASHTO. (2007). LRFD bridge design specifications, Washington, DC.
ABAQUS Version 6.8.2 [Computer software]. Providence, RI, Simulia.
Adams, C. (2009). “Finite element study on bridge details susceptible to distortion-induced fatigue.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Kansas, Lawrence, KS.
AISC. (2005). Steel construction manual, 13th Ed., Chicago.
Alemdar, F. (2011). “Evaluation of repair methods for steel girders damaged by distortion-induced fatigue.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Kansas, Lawrence, KS.
American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI). (1997). Example 2: Two-span continuous composite I girder, Washington, DC.
Barth, A. S., and Bowman, M. D. (2001). “Fatigue behavior of welded diaphragm-to-beam connections.” J. Struct. Eng., 127(10), 1145–1152.
Barth, K. E., Hartnagel, B. A., White, D. W., and Barker, M. G. (2004). “Recommended procedures for simplified inelastic design of steel I-girder bridges.” J. Bridge Eng., 9(3), 230–242.
Berglund, E., and Schultz, A. (2006). “Girder differential deflection and distortion-induced fatigue in skewed steel bridges.” J. Bridge Eng., 11(2), 169–177.
Colorado DOT (CDOT). (2009). Bridge design manual, Colorado DOT, Denver.
Connor, R. J., and Fisher, J. W. (2006). “Identifying effective and ineffective retrofits for distortion fatigue cracking in steel bridges using field instrumentation.” J. Bridge Eng., 11(6), 745–752.
Fisher, J. W., Barthelemy, B. M., Mertz, D. R., and Edinger, J. A. (1980). “Fatigue behavior of full-scale welded bridge attachments.” National Cooperative Highway Research Program Rep. No. 227, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC.
Fisher, J. W., Jian, J., Wagner, D. C., and Yen, B. T. (1990). “Distortion-induced fatigue cracking in steel bridges.” National Cooperative Highway Research Program Rep. No. 336, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC.
Fisher, J. W., and Mertz, D. R. (1984). “Fatigue and fracture in steel bridges.” Proc., Conf. on Bridges, Int. Bridge Conf., Engineer's Society of Western Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh, PA, 10–21.
Fraser, R. E. K., Grondin, G. Y., and Kulak, G. L. (2000). “Behavior of distortion-induced fatigue cracks in bridge girders.” Structural Engineering Rep. No. 235, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Gangel, R. (2012). “Use of CFRP overlays to repair fatigue damage in steel bridge girders and components.” M.S. thesis, Univ. of Kansas, Lawrence, KS.
Hartman, A., Hassel, H., Adams, C., Bennett, C., Matamoros, A., and Rolfe, S. (2010). “Effects of cross-frame placement and skew on distortion-induced fatigue in steel bridges.” Transportation Research Record 2200, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 62–68.
Hassel, H. (2011). “An analytical evaluation of distortion-induced fatigue in steel bridges.” M.S. thesis, Univ. of Kansas, Lawrence, KS.
Illinois DOT (IlDOT). (2009). Bridge manual, Illinois DOT Bureau of Bridges and Structures, Springfield, IL.
Iowa DOT (IoDOT). (2010). LRFD bridge design manual, Iowa DOT Office of Bridges and Structures, Ames, IA.
Jajich, D., and Schultz, A. E. (2003). “Measurement and analysis of distortion-induced fatigue in multigirder steel bridges.” J. Bridge Eng., 8(2), 84–91.
Kansas DOT (KDOT). (2010). Design manual: Volume III—Bridge selection, Kansas DOT, Topeka, KS.
Khalil, A., Wipf, T. J., Greimann, L., Wood, D. L., and Brakke, B. (1998). “Retrofit solution for out-of-plane distortion of X-type diaphragm bridges.” Proc., Transportation Conf., Iowa Department of Transportation, Ames, IA, 99–102.
Li, H., and Schultz, A. E. (2005). “Analysis of girder differential deflection and web gap stress for rapid assessment of distortional fatigue in multi-girder steel bridges.” Final Rep. 2005-38, Minnesota Dept. of Transportation, St. Paul, MN.
Roddis, W. M. K., and Zhao, Y. (2001). “Out-of-plane fatigue cracking in welded steel bridges: Why it happened and how it can be repaired.” Welding Innovation, 27(2), 2–7.
Texas DOT (TxDOT). (2009). Bridge design manual—LRFD, Texas DOT, Austin, TX.
Wang, L., and Helwig, T. A. (2008). “Stability bracing requirements for steel bridge girders with skewed supports.” J. Bridge Eng., 13(2), 149–157.
Wisconsin DOT (WDOT). (2002). Bridge manual, Wisconsin DOT, Madison, WI.
Yura, J. (2001). “Fundamentals of beam bracing.” Eng. J., First Quarter, 11–26.
Yura, J., Phillips, B., Raju, S., and Web, S. (1992). “Bracing of steel beams in bridges.” Rep. No. 1239-4F, Center for Transportation Research, Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX.
Zhao, Y., and Roddis, W. M. K. (2003). “Finite element study of distortion-induced fatigue in welded steel bridges.” Transportation Research Record 1845, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 57–65.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 8, 2011
Accepted: Feb 17, 2012
Published online: Feb 21, 2012
Published in print: Jul 1, 2013
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.