Parametric Study and Design Recommendations for In-Span Hinges in Reinforced Concrete Box-Girder Bridges
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 17, Issue 2
Abstract
In-span hinges (ISHs) are located at the bridge deck of reinforced concrete box-girder bridges and are used to transmit vertical loads between two adjacent parts of the deck. ISHs are disturbed regions because of the complex three-dimensional stress state caused by concentrated bearing loads and utility openings. The common modeling practice for ISHs is simplified two-dimensional idealization as short cantilevers following standard procedures. Such simplified analytical and design procedures lead to inefficient detailing because they do not take into account the realistic failure modes of ISHs; punching shear is one of these critical modes. In this study, the influence of reinforcement and geometrical detailing on the behavior and strength of ISHs is assessed using a computational approach. The computational model is calibrated based on previous experimental results and adopts nonlinear three-dimensional finite-element analysis (FEA), accounting for cracking of concrete and elastic–plastic behavior of reinforcement. The concrete material is modeled using the total strain rotating crack method, and the effect of compression softening is incorporated into the constitutive model. The reinforcing steel is modeled using embedded reinforcement formulation assuming a perfect bond between the concrete and the reinforcement. From the computational study, design guidelines are presented for better constructability of these disturbed regions. Findings from this study revealed that the strength of ISHs is mostly improved by increasing the amount of diagonal reinforcement in the seat and by increasing the bearing plate size.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS) under Contract No. CADOT59A0508. The reinforcing steel donated by Headed Reinforcement Corporation (HRC) and the Concrete Reinforcing Steel Institute (CRSI) is gratefully acknowledged.
References
American Concrete Institute (ACI) Committee 318 (ACI318). (2008). “Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary.” ACI 318-02, ACI, Farmington Hills, MI.
California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS). (2004). Bridge Design Specifications, Sacramento, CA.
California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS). (2010). Bridge Standard XS Detail Sheets, Sacramento, CA.
Comité Euro-International du Béton (CEB-FIP). (1990). CEB-FIP Model Code 1990, Thomas Telford Services, London.
Hube, M. A., and Mosalam, K. M. (2008). “Experimental and computational evaluation of current and innovative in-span hinge details in reinforced concrete box-girder bridges—Part 1: Experimental findings and pre-test analysis.” PEER Report 2008/103, Univ. of California, Berkeley.
Hube, M. A., and Mosalam, K. M. (2009). “Experimental and computational evaluation of current and innovative in-span hinge details in reinforced concrete box-girder bridges—Part 2: Post-test analysis and design recommendations.” PEER Report 2009/107, Univ. of California, Berkeley.
Hube, M. A., and Mosalam, K. M. (2010). “Experimental evaluation of in-span hinge details in reinforced concrete box-girder bridges.” Transportation Research Record 2200, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 127–134.
Hube, M. A., and Mosalam, K. M. (2011). “Experimental and computational evaluation of in-span hinges in reinforced concrete box-girder bridges.” J. Struct. Eng., 137(11), 1245–1253.
Hughes, T. J. (2000). The Finite Element Method, Linear Static and Dynamic Finite Element Analysis, Dover, Mineola, NY.
Rots, J., Nauta, P., Kusters, G., and Blaauwendraad, J. (1985). “Smeared crack approach and fracture localization in concrete.” Heron, 30(1), 1–48.
Selby, R. G., and Vecchio, F. J. (1993). “Three dimensional constitutive relations for reinforced concrete.” Technical Report 93-02, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
TNO DIANA BV. (2008). DIANA 9.3 User’s Manual Delft, The Netherlands.
Vecchio, F. J., and Collins, M. P. (1993). “Compression response of cracked reinforced concrete.” J. Struct. Eng., 119(12), 3590–3610.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2012 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Dec 5, 2010
Accepted: Apr 15, 2011
Published online: Apr 18, 2011
Published in print: Mar 1, 2012
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.