Behavior of Segmental Precast Posttensioned Bridge Piers under Lateral Loads
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 17, Issue 5
Abstract
A segmental precast posttensioned (SPPT) bridge pier is an economic recentering structural system. Understanding the seismic behavior of a SPPT system is an important step toward its application in high seismic zones. This paper presents a detailed three-dimensional finite-element (FE) model that was developed using the ABAQUS platform. A brief description and discussion of cyclic tests on eight large-scale SPPT piers is also presented. Four of the piers were constructed and tested to a predefined degree of damage. Then, these piers were retrofitted and retested. The FE models developed and presented in this paper predicted the backbone curves of the piers that were tested directly after construction with an average error of 7% for drift angles smaller than 2.5%. For drift angles greater than 2.5%, the average error reached 13%. For piers that were retrofitted and retested, the error in predicting the backbone curve depended on the state of damage before the retest. When preexistent microcracks were not severe, the FE models were able to predict the backbone curves with an error of approximately 12%. However, the error significantly increased and reached a value of approximately 31% when the preexistent microcracks were severe. In addition, the FE models confirmed the experimental observations and showed that the SPPT pier system is able to withstand large lateral drift angles with minimal damage. Finally, sensitivity analyses using the FE model showed that the model is sensitive to the softening behavior of the concrete material constitutive law.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
Funding for this research was provided by Transportation Northwest (TransNow) under Project No. 5200. Their assistance is greatly appreciated.
References
American Concrete Institute (ACI). (2008). “Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI318-08) and commentary (ACI318R-08).” ACI 318, Farmington Hills, MI.
ASTM. (2002). “Standard test method for static modulus of elasticity and Poisson’s ratio of concrete in compression.” ASTM C469-02, West Conshohocken, PA.
Chang, K. C., Loh, C. H., Chiu, H. S., Hwang, J. S., Cheng, C. B., and Wang, J. C. (2002). Seismic behavior of precast segmental bridge columns and design methodology for applications in Taiwan, Taiwan Area National Expressway Engineering Bureau, Taipei, Taiwan (in Chinese).
Chou, C.-C., and Chen, Y.-C. (2006). “Cyclic tests of post-tensioned precast CFT segmental bridge columns with unbonded strands.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 35(2), 159–175.
Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corporation (SIMULIA). (2008). ABAQUS software and documentation, version 6.8-2, Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corporation, Providence, RI.
Dawood, H. M. (2010). “Seismic behavior of segmental precast post-tensioned concrete piers.” M.Sc. thesis, Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA.
ElGawady, M., Booker, A. J., and Dawood, H. M. (2010). “Seismic behavior of posttensioned concrete-filled fiber tubes.” J. Compos. Constr., 14(5), 616–628.
ElGawady, M. A., and Sha’lan, A. (2011). “Seismic behavior of self-centering precast segmental bridge bents.” J. Bridge Eng., 16(3), 328–339.
Hewes, J. T. (2002). “Seismic design and performance of precast concrete segmental bridge columns.” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
Lee, J., and Fenves, G. L. (1998). “Plastic-damage model for cyclic loading of concrete structures.” J. Eng. Mech., 124(8), 892–900.
Lee, W. K., and Billington, S. L. (2010). “Modeling residual displacements of concrete bridge columns under earthquake loads using fiber elements.” J. Bridge Eng., 15(3), 240–249.
Lubliner, J., Oliver, J., Oller, S., and Oñate, E. (1989). “A plastic-damage model for concrete.” Int. J. Solids Struct., 25(3), 299–326.
Mander, J. B., Priestley, M. J. N., and Park, R. (1988). “‘Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete.” J. Struct. Eng., 114(8), 1804–1826.
Marriott, D., Pampanin, S., and Palermo, A. (2009). “Quasi-static and pseudo-dynamic testing of unbonded post-tensioned rocking bridge piers with external replaceable dissipaters.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 38(3), 331–354.
Ou, Y.-C., Chiewanichakorn, M., Aref, A. J., and Lee, G. C. (2007). “Seismic performance of segmental precast unbonded posttensioned concrete bridge columns.” J. Struct. Eng., 133(11), 1636–1647.
Priestley, N., Sritharan, S., Conley, J., and Pampanin, S. (1999). “Preliminary results and conclusions from the PRESSS five-story precast concrete test building.” PCI J., 44(6), 42–76.
Samaan, M., Mirmiran, A., and Shahawy, M. (1998). “Model of concrete confined by fiber composite.” J. Struct. Eng., 124(9), 1025–1031.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 17 • Issue 5 • September 2012
Pages: 735 - 746
Copyright
© 2012 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 12, 2010
Accepted: Mar 28, 2011
Published online: May 26, 2011
Published in print: Sep 1, 2012
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.