Rapid Assessment of Gusset Plate Safety in Steel Truss Bridges
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 17, Issue 2
Abstract
Research into the cause of the failure of the I-35W Bridge in Minneapolis, Minnesota, has indicated that some of the gusset plates were significantly overstressed. The Federal Highway Administration has recommended load rating all gusset plate connections in bridges around the country using their recommended load rating procedures, which are complex and require a large commitment of resources. Further, the procedures use approximate ultimate capacity and therefore do not address serviceability or bridge longevity, which require prediction of gusset plate yielding, not collapse. A triage evaluation procedure is proposed to enable rapid, yet conservative, identification of gusset plates that may be yielding under service loads and to eliminate gusset plates with adequate capacity from needing further or more sophisticated analysis. High-resolution finite element models of gusset plate connections from Washington State bridges and the connection identified as critical from the I-35W Bridge are used to develop the proposed procedure and evaluate the current recommendations. A complex interaction of stresses is generated in gusset plates by connecting members, and this interaction can initiate gusset plate yielding when the uniaxial stresses on Whitmore sections associated with those connecting members are well below yield. It is demonstrated that the onset of gusset plate yielding may be conservatively predicted by comparing the uniaxial stresses at Whitmore sections with . Additionally, a modification to the simple column analogy method recommended by FHWA for calculating the buckling capacity of gusset plates is proposed, and it is shown that gusset plate yielding occurs prior to buckling in all cases considered. The triage evaluation procedure is grounded in mechanics and conservative assumptions, enabling more rapid identification of problem gusset plates while also being reasonably conservative. The method is then applied to three bridges, from which 3 gusset plates out of 35 are identified as requiring additional investigation.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by the Washington State Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. However, any opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations presented in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsors. The authors would like to specifically thank Washington State Bridge Preservation Engineer Harvey Coffman and Load Rating Engineer Mohamad Al-Salman for their invaluable contributions to this research.
References
AASHTO. (2007). LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C.
AASHTO. (2008). Manual for Bridge Evaluation, 1st Ed., American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C.
AISC. (2005). Manual for Steel Construction, Chicago, 13th Ed., American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago.
ANSYS [Computer software]. (2008). “ANSYS release 11 reference manual.” ANSYS, Canonsburg, PA.
Astaneh-Asl, A. (1989). “Simple methods for design of gusset plates.” Proceedings ASCE Structures Conference, ASCE, Reston, VA, 345–354.
ASTM. (1924). “Standard specifications for structural steel for bridges.” ASTM A7, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (1939). “Standard specifications for structural steel for buildings and bridges.” ASTM A7-39, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (1946). “Standard specifications for structural silicon steel.” ASMT A94-46, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA.
Bjorhovde, R., and Chakrabarti, S. K. (1985). “Test of full size gusset plate connections.” J. Struct. Eng., 111(3), 667–684.
Brockenbrough, R. L. (2002). Design Guide 15: AISC Rehabilitation and Retrofit Guide, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago.
Brown, V. L. S. (1998). “Stability of gusseted connections in steel structures.” Doctoral dissertation, Univ. of Delaware.
FHWA. (2009). “Load rating guidance and examples for bolted and riveted gusset plates in truss bridges.” Publication No. FHWA-IF-09-014, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
Hao, S. H. (2010). “The I-35W Bridge Collapse.” J. Bridge Eng., 15(5), 608–614.
Hardash, S. G., and Bjorhovde, R. (1985). “New design criteria for gusset plates in tension.” Eng. J., 22(2), 77–94.
Higgins, C., Senturk, A. E., and Turan, O. T. (2010). “Comparison of block shear and Whitmore section methods for load rating existing steel truss gusset plate connections.” J. Bridge Eng., 15(2), 160–171.
Liao, M., Okazaki, T., Ballarini, R., Schultz, A. E., and Galambos, T. V.(2011). “Nonlinear finite-element analysis of critical gusset plates in the I-35 Bridge in Minnesota.” J. Struct. Eng., 137(1), 59–68.
Ocel, J. M., and Wright, W. J. (2008). “Finite element modeling of I-35 bridge collapse.” Final Report, Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center Report, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
Olson, A. W. (2010). “Triage evaluation of gusset plates in steel truss bridges.” MSCE thesis, Univ. of WA.
Roeder, C. W., Lehman, D. E., and Yoo, J. H. (2005). “Improved seismic design of steel frame connections.” Int. J. Steel Struct., 5(2), 141–153.
Thornton, W. A. (1984). “Bracing connections for heavy construction.” Eng. J., 21(3), 139–148.
Vasarhelyi, D. D. (1971). “Tests of gusset plate models.” J. Struct. Div., 97(2), 665–678.
Whitmore, R. E. (1952). “Experimental investigation of stresses in gusset plates.” Bulletin No. 16, Engineering experiment station, Univ. of Tennessee.
Yam, M. C. H. (1994). “Compressive behavior and strength of steel gusset plate connections.” Doctoral dissertation, Univ. of Alberta, Canada.
Yam, M. C. H., and Cheng, J. J. R. (2002). “Behavior and design of gusset plate connections in compression.” J. Constr. Steel Res., 58(5–8), 1143–1159.
Yoo, J. H. (2006). “Analytical investigation on the seismic performance of special concentrically braced frames.” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Washington.
Yoo, J. H., Roeder, C. W., and Lehman, D. E. (2008). “FEM simulation and failure analysis of special concentrically braced frame tests.” J. Struct. Eng., 134(6), Reston, VA, 881–889.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 17 • Issue 2 • March 2012
Pages: 221 - 231
Copyright
© 2012 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Mar 22, 2010
Accepted: Mar 18, 2011
Published online: Mar 21, 2011
Published in print: Mar 1, 2012
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.