Rational Alternative to Positive Discovery of Pile-Supported Bridges with Unknown Foundation Depth
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 17, Issue 1
Abstract
Bridges with unknown foundations have been a burden on the transportation agencies across the United States because of the lack of funding and availability of rational methods to determine the risk of failure of these bridges from scour. The embedment of unknown foundation bridges is a key to proceed further with any risk-based management approach and/or the widely used Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) guidelines on the methods of evaluation of unknown foundations. The need for a practical, cost-effective, and rational approach to positive discovery of bridge foundations and to reclassify bridges with unknown foundations is greater than ever. This technical note presents an assessment of the predictive capability of various methods currently in use to determine the embedment of unknown foundation bridges. The methods discussed in this paper include sonic echo method (or pile integrity tester) as non-destructive testing (NDT), inference (IM) and/or back calculation (BC) [i.e., reverse engineering (RE)], and static/back calculation (S/B-C). The well-documented case histories presented in the paper illustrate the usefulness of using the S/B-C method in determining the embedment of unknown foundations. The S/B-C also can be used to assess/validate NDT results and embedment estimates made by IM and/or BC (RE) approaches. For high priority unknown foundation bridges, the S/B-C reasonable minimum embedment and the embedment required for stability considering the scour can be used to plan and efficiently implement any future NDT for these bridges. It can significantly reduce the cost of treating unknown foundation bridges by optimizing the use of NDT, if warranted. The three case histories presented in the paper also suggest that, in general, the sonic echo (i.e., pile integrity tester)/NDT tends to be conservative whereas the IM and/or BC (RE) methods tend to be unconservative. This would lead to high cost or high risk, respectively, if such estimates are used to assess the stability of unknown foundation bridges impacted by scour.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (2002). Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, 17th Edition.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (1998). “Driven 1.0: A Microsoft Windows based program for determining ultimate vertical static pile capacity.” Washington, DC.
Federal Highway Administration and Florida Dept. of Transportation (FHWA/FDOT). (2009). “Unknown foundation bridges pilot study.” Washington, DC
Florida Dept. of Transportation (FDOT). (2000). “User’s manual for FB-MultiPier/FB-PIER program.” Bridge Software Institute, Gainesville, FL.
Florida Dept. of Transportation (FDOT). (2009). “User’s manual for FB-Deep.” Bridge Software Institute, Gainesville, FL.
Goble, Rauche, Likins and Associates, Inc. (GRL). (2000). “Dynamic low strain pile integrity testing (PIT)—Sanibel Causeway project.” Rep. to Universal Engineering Sciences, GRL Job No. 003075, Cleveland, OH.
Kimley-Horn and Associates and GCI. (2000). “Phase III Evaluation Report for Bridge No. 124041, 124042, and 124043.” Lee County, FL.
Nichols, S. (2009). “Overview—Assessment of bridges with unknown foundations.” FHWA Unknown Foundation Webinar 1, 〈http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/unknown foundations〉 (Jan. 13, 2010).
Nurmi, C. (2009). “Plans of action and management systems for bridges coded ‘U’.” Assessment of Bridges with Unknown Foundations, FHWA Unknown Foundation Webinar 4, 〈http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/unknownfoundations〉 (Jan. 13, 2010).
Olson, L. D., Jalinoos, F., and Aouad, M. F. (1998). “Determination of unknown subsurface bridge foundations.” A summary of the NCHRP 21-5 Interim Rep., USDOT Geotechnical Engineering Notebook Guideline No. 16, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Washington, DC.
Rivers, B. (2009). “Positive discovery and inference.” Assessment of Bridges with Unknown Foundations, FHWA Unknown Foundation Webinar 3, 〈http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/unknownfoundations〉 (Jan. 13, 2010).
Rivers, B., and Nurmi, C. (2009). “Categorization, thresholds, and prioritization.” Assessment of Bridges with Unknown Foundations, FHWA Unknown Foundation Webinar 2, 〈http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/unknownfoundations〉 (Jan. 13, 2010).
Sayed, S. M. (2005). “Personal communications, general approach to unknown foundations.” Scour Technology—FHWA Unknown Foundation Summit, Lakewood, CO.
Sayed, S. M., and Bakeer, R. M. (1992). “Efficiency formula for pile groups.” J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., 118(2), 278–299.
Sayed, S. M., Sunna, H., and Moore, P. R. (2009a). “Re-classifying bridges with unknown foundations.” 41st Southeastern Transportation Geotechnical Engineering Conf. (STGEC), Geotechnical Engineering Unit, North Carolina Dept. of Transportation, Raleigh, NC.
Sayed, S. M., Sunna, H., Amaning, K. O., Jetha, N. K., and Garcia, J. (2009b). “Stability assessment of bridges impacted by scour.” Proc. 17th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (ISSMGE), Alexandria, 2, 1333–1336.
Sayed, S. M., Sunna, H., and Moore, P. R. (2010). “Re-classifying bridges with unknown foundations.” Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Scour and Erosion (ICSE-5), ASCE Geo-Institute, Reston, VA, 903–913.
Stein, S., and Sedmera, K. (2006). “Risk-based management guidelines for scour at bridges with unknown Foundations.” Web-Only Document 107, Project 24-25, N.C.H.R.P., Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 〈http://www.trb.org/Publications/Blurbs/157792.aspx〉.
Sunna, H. N., Sayed, S. M., and Jetha, N. K. (2008). “Proposed approach to unknown foundations.” Geotechnical, Geophysical and Geoenvironmental Engineering Technology Transfer Conf. and Exposition (Geo3t2), Geotechnical Engineering Unit, North Carolina Dept. of Transportation, Raleigh, NC.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2012 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 13, 2010
Accepted: Feb 9, 2011
Published online: Dec 15, 2011
Published in print: Jan 1, 2012
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.