Indicial Functions for Bridge Aeroelastic Forces and Time-Domain Flutter Analysis
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 16, Issue 4
Abstract
This paper presents a detailed numerical algorithm for time-domain flutter analysis of elongated bridges, emphasizing in particular some problematic issues with regard to the application of the indicial functions involved wherein. Some typical characteristics of the indicial functions adopted early in airfoil aeronautics and those in bridge aerodynamics are first reviewed. The paper then presents the indicial-function-expressed aerodynamic forces and the recursive functions involved in the integral of the memorial terms in them. The theoretical description and numerical results indicate that the aeroelastic forces expressed with indicial functions are, if the model parameters are well identified, equivalent to those with flutter derivatives. However, this is merely an equivalence of frequency spectrum, and the transient characteristics of the indicial functions so identified, therefore, may not be physically true. This may result in excessively distorted aeroelastic forces and extraordinary time-consuming attenuation of the incorrect transient responses. To avoid such problems, a methodology of linear searching of the indicial-function parameters in predefined ranges is developed, on the basis of which the influence of some important factors, such as the time step size and numerical ranges of model parameters, are investigated. Numerical results show that large time step size may induce nonnegligible additional phase differences between the simulated aeroelastic forces and the structural motions and thus affect the total work accumulation and, consequently, the flutter threshold. Therefore, care should be taken in selecting an appropriate time integral step size.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the support of the National Science Foundation (Grant No. NSF90915002 and NSF50738002) to the work described in this paper.
References
Borri, C., Costa, C., and Zahlten, W. (2002). “Non-stationary flow forces for the numerical simulation of aeroelastic instability of bridge decks.” Comput. Struct., 80, 1071–1079.
Caracoglia, L., and Jones, N. P. (2003a). “A methodology for the experimental extraction of indicial functions for streamlined and bluff deck sections.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 91, 609–636.
Caracoglia, L., and Jones, N. P. (2003b). “Time domain vs. frequency domain characterization of aeroelastic forces for bridge deck sections.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 91, 371–402.
Chowdhury, A., and Sarkar, P. (2005). “Experimental identification of rational function coefficients for time-domain flutter analysis.” Eng. Struct., 27, 1349–1364.
Costa, C., and Borri, C. (2006). “Application of indicial functions in bridge deck aeroelasticity.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 94(11), 859–881.
Denegri, C. M., and Cutchins, M. A. (1997). “Evaluation of classical flutter analysis for the prediction of limit cycle oscillations.” AIAA Paper 97-1021, Seattle, WA.
Dowell, E. H. (2004). A modern course in aeroelasticity, 4th Ed., Kluwer Academic, Boston.
Jones, R. T. (1940). “The unsteady lift on a wing of finite aspect ratio.” NACA Report 681, U.S. National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Langley, VA
Lazzari, M., Vitaliani, R. V., and Saetta, A. V. (2004). “Aeroelastic forces and dynamic response of long-span bridges.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 60(6), 1011–1048.
Li, Q. C., and Lin, Y. K. (1995). “New stochastic theory for bridge stability in turbulent flow.” J. Eng. Mech., 121(1), 102–116.
Salvatori, L., and Borri, C. (2007). “Frequency and time-domain methods for the numerical modeling of full-bridge aeroelasticity.” Comput. Struct., 85, 675–687.
Scanlan, R. H. (1993). “Problematics in formulation of wind-force models for bridge decks.” J. Eng. Mech., 119, 1353–1375.
Scanlan, R. H. (2000). “Motion-related body force functions in two-dimensional low-speed flow.” J. Fluids Struct., 14, 49–63.
Scanlan, R. H., Beliveau, J. G., and Budlong, K. S. (1974). “Indicial aerodynamic functions for bridge decks.” J. Engrg. Mech. Div., 100(EM4), 657–671.
Scanlan, R. H., and Budlong, K. S. (1971). “Flutter and aerodynamic response considerations for bluff objects in smooth flow.” Proc., Symp. on Flow-Induced Structural Vibrations, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Theodorsen, T. (1934). “General theory of aerodynamic instability and the mechanism of flutter.” NACA Report 496, U.S. Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Langley, VA.
Wagner H. (1925). “Ueber die Entstehung des Dynamischen Auftriebes von Tragfluegeln.” Zeitschrift fuer Angewandte Mathematik, und Mechanik, 5, 17–35 (in German).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2011 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 10, 2010
Accepted: Aug 31, 2010
Published online: Sep 6, 2010
Published in print: Jul 1, 2011
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.