Cyclic Testing of Large-Scale Rectangular Bridge Columns under Bidirectional Earthquake Components
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 16, Issue 3
Abstract
Bidirectional cyclic testing was performed on four half-scale reinforced-concrete rectangular bridge column specimens to examine the need to account for bidirectional seismic loading in design for earthquakes expected in eastern and western regions of North America. The prototype structures are common two-span, skewed bridge structures designed according to the seismic provisions of Canadian Standards Association (CSA)-S6-06. The column specimens are in cross section and 3.0 m tall and assumed to carry a gravity load of 6% . Two specimens were designed for Montreal, Quebec, Canada (east site), using 0 and 30% combination rules, resulting in longitudinal steel ratios of 0.41 and 0.57%. Two specimens represented the column part of bridges located in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (west site), with longitudinal steel ratios of 0.97 and 1.72% resulting from the application of 0 and 40% combination rules. Site-specific cyclic displacement test protocols were developed from time-history analysis of the bridges. For both sites, the tests showed that the combination rules used in design had no significant influence on the inelastic cyclic response of the columns. The columns designed for the Montreal site exhibited satisfactory inelastic cyclic performance even if they had a longitudinal reinforcement ratio less than the current CSA S6 limit of 0.8%. All columns were subjected to biaxial shear forces corresponding to their biaxial flexural strength envelope. For all specimens, the height of the plastic hinge region was approximately equal to the smaller column dimension, rather than the larger one as currently specified in CSA S6.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The experimental program was sponsored by the Quebec Ministry of Transportation. The project was also part of Canadian Seismic Research Network activities under the Strategic Network Grant Program the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). The financial support provided to the first writer by the École de Technologie Supérieure, Université du Québec, is gratefully acknowledged.
References
AASHTO. (2009). Guide specifications for LRFD seismic bridge design, 1st Ed., Washington, DC.
Bousias, S. N., Verzeletti, G., Fardis, M. N., and Gutierrez, E. (1995). “Load-path effects in column biaxial bending with axial force.” J. Eng. Mech., 121(5), 596–605.
Canadian Standards Association (CSA). (2006). “Canadian highway bridge design code.” CAN/CSA S6-06, Mississauga, ON, Canada.
Dodd, L. L., and Cooke, N. (1992). “The dynamic behavior of reinforced concrete bridge piers subjected to New Zealand seismicity.” Research Rep. 92-04, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Hachem, M. M., Mahin, S. A., and Moehle, J. P. (2003). “Performance of circular reinforced concrete bridge columns under bidirectional earthquake loading.” Rep. No. PEER 2003/06, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, College of Engineering, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
Inoue, N., Wenliuhan, H., Kanno, H. Hori, N., and Ogawa, J. (2000). “Shaking table tests of reinforced concrete columns subjected to simulated input motions with different time durations.” Proc. 12th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 1734, New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand.
Khaled, A., Tremblay, R., and Massicotte, B. (2010). “Combination rule for the prediction of the seismic demand on columns of regular bridges under bi-directional earthquake components.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., in press.
Kitajima, K., Adachi, H., and Nakanishi, M. (1996). “Response characteristics of reinforced concrete structures under bi-directional earthquake motions.” Proc. 11th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 566, Pergamon, Elsevier Science, Oxford, England.
National Research Council of Canada (NRCC). (2005). National building code of Canada, 12th Ed., Ottawa.
Priestley, M. J. N., Seible, F., and Benzoni, G. (1994). “Seismic performance of circular columns with low longitudinal steel ratios.” Rep. No. SSRP-94/08, Structural Systems Research, Univ. of California, San Diego and La Jolla, CA.
Rosenblueth, E., and Contreras, H. (1977). “Approximate design for multicomponent earthquakes.” J. Eng. Mech. Div., 103(5), 895–911.
Taylor, A. W., El-Bahy, A., Stone, W. C., and Kunnath, S. (1996). “Effect of load path on seismic damage to RC bridge columns.” Proc. 11th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 1897, Pergamon, Elsevier Science, Oxford, England.
Wong, Y. L., Paulay, T., and Priestley, M. J. N. (1993). “Response of circular reinforced concrete columns to multi-directional seismic attack.” ACI Struct. J., 90(2), 180–191.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2011 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 1, 2010
Accepted: Jul 18, 2010
Published online: Aug 20, 2010
Published in print: May 1, 2011
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.