Data-Based Prediction of Unsteady Aerodynamic Forces Induced by Free-Stream Turbulence
Publication: Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 35, Issue 6
Abstract
Accurate prediction of the aerodynamic forces induced by free-stream disturbance has been a challenge for flight safety. In this paper, a novel data-based approach to model the online unsteady and nonlinear response of aircraft, i.e., aerodynamic drag and lift coefficients from inflow disturbance, which can be measured in practical flights by Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR), is established and tested. Numerical simulations with the NACA 0012 airfoil were performed to collect samples in order to train a neural network. Each sample consists of the time series of the inflow disturbance and the aerodynamic coefficients, both transformed to the Fourier space to reduce training cost and the degree of overfitting. The impacts of the number of samples and their distributions on the prediction were analyzed. Four inflow profiles with increasing complexity were tested. Various hyperparameters were first investigated, and it was found that the neural network trained with activation function TanH and optimized scaled conjugate gradient algorithm had the best performance. Finally, neural networks for both drag and lift coefficients were trained with a total of 1,300 randomly distributed samples, and a mean error of 2.1% was achieved in the test.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
James Nash and Qiangqiang Sun contributed to the paper equally. We are grateful to Dr. Xuerui Mao for his advice on this article.
References
Aouf, N., B. Boulet, and R. M. Botez. 2000. “Robust gust load alleviation for a flexible aircraft.” Can. Aeronaut. Space J. 46 (3): 131–139.
Ba, L. J., and R. Caruana. 2013. “Do deep nets really need to be deep?” Preprint, submitted December 21, 2013. https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.6184.
Barny, H. 2012. “DELICAT-demonstration of LIDAR based clear air turbulence detection.” In Proc., Innovation for Sustainable Aviation in a Global Environment: Proc. Sixth European Aeronautics Days, 30. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.
Brunton, S., B. R. Noack, and P. Koumoutsakos. 2020. “Machine learning for fluid mechanics.” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 52 (1): 477–508. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-010719-060214.
Demuth, H., and M. Beale. 2002. Neural network toolbox for use with MATLAB. 4th ed. Natick, MA: MathWorks Inc.
Dutton, J. A., and H. A. Panofsky. 1970. “Clean air turbulence: A mystery may be unfolding.” Science 167 (3920): 937–944. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.167.3920.937.
Erichson, N. B., L. Mathelin, Z. Yao, S. L. Brunton, M. W. Mahoney, and J. N. Kutz. 2020. “Shallow neural networks for fluid flow reconstruction with limited sensors.” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 476 (2238): 20200097. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2020.0097.
Fezans, N., J. Schwithal, and D. Fischenberg. 2017. “In-flight remote sensing and identification of gusts, turbulence, and wake vortices using a Doppler LiDAR.” CEAS Astronaut. J. 8 (2): 313–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-017-0240-9.
Khaw, J. F., B. S. Lim, and L. E. Lim. 1995. “Optimal design of neural networks using the Taguchi method.” Neurocomputing 7 (3): 225–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-2312(94)00013-I.
Kurtulus, D. F. 2009. “Ability to forecast unsteady aerodynamic forces of flapping airfoils by artificial neural network.” Neural Comput. Appl. 18 (4): 359–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-008-0186-2.
Küssner, H. G. 1936. “Zusammenfassender bericht über den instationären auftrieb von flügeln.” Luftfahrtforschung 13 (12): 410–424.
Laitone, E. V. 1997. “Wind tunnel tests of wings at Reynolds numbers below 70000.” Exp. Fluids 23 (5): 405–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003480050128.
Pusch, M., A. Knoblach, and T. Kier. 2015. “Integrated optimization of ailerons for active gust load alleviation.” In Proc., Int. Forum on Aroelasticity and Structural Dynamics 2015. Saint Petersburg, Russia: Central Aerohydrodynamic Institute.
Rajkumar, T., and J. Bardina. 2002. “Prediction of aerodynamic coefficients using neural networks for.” In Proc., Flairs Conf., 242–246. Palo Alto, CA: AAAI Press.
Schreck, S. J., W. E. Faller, and M. W. Luttges. 1995. “Neural network prediction of three-dimensional unsteady separated flowfields.” J. Aircr. 32 (1): 178–185. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46698.
Sedky, G., F. D. Lagor, and A. Jones. 2020. “Unsteady aerodynamics of lift regulation during a transverse gust encounter.” Phys. Rev. Fluids 5 (7): 074701. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.5.074701.
Shalev-Shwartz, S., and S. Ben-David. 2014. Understanding machine learning: From theory to algorithms. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Soltani, M. R., K. Ghorbanian, M. Gholamrezaei, and M. Amiralaei. 2007. “Unsteady three dimensional aerodynamic load prediction using neural networks.” In Proc., Int. Joint Conf. on Neural Networks, 1995–1999. New York: IEEE.
Theodorsen, T. 1935. General theory of aerodynamic instability and the mechanism of flutter. NACA Report, 496. Washington, DC: National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics.
Wu, H., X. Liu, W. An, S. Chen, and H. Lyu. 2020. “A deep learning approach for efficiently and accurately evaluating the flow field of supercritical airfoils.” Comput. Fluid 198 (Feb): 104393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2019.104393.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 23, 2021
Accepted: Jul 14, 2022
Published online: Sep 8, 2022
Published in print: Nov 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Feb 8, 2023
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.