A Fast and Efficient Method for Multiobjective Aerodynamic Optimization of a Civil Aircraft Fuselage
Publication: Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 35, Issue 6
Abstract
This study presents a new method for aerodynamic optimization of a civil aircraft fuselage. Typically, the fuselage is designed for minimum drag force at cruise conditions, which is essential for determining the flight cost. Evolutionary optimization methods, as a powerful tool, require the accurate computations of flows around several hundreds of candidate geometries, which in turn are too costly and time-consuming. One strategy is to use two-dimensional simulations that reduce the computational cost by at least one order of magnitude. This approach was applied in the current work, and the results were obtained with the aim of minimizing the drag coefficient and maximizing the lift coefficient. A genetic algorithm (GA) was used for shape optimization, and the objective function evaluation was carried out using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). A fuselage shape parameterization method is presented that accounts for important flow features. The 150-seat aircraft model designed in Amirkabir University of Technology was considered as a reference body. In the first step, the optimization is carried out for the single objective of minimizing the drag coefficient. Then, the multiobjective optimization is performed with the simultaneous drag coefficient minimization and lift coefficient maximization. Finally, the two-dimensional (2D) side view of the optimum fuselages is used for generation of the corresponding three-dimensional (3D) geometry. The results show that such 3D optimum fuselage reduced the drag coefficient by about 11% while increasing the lift coefficient by 29% in comparison with the original geometry.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.
References
Boutemedjet, A., M. Samardžić, L. Rebhi, Z. Rajić, and T. Mouada. 2019. “UAV aerodynamic design involving genetic algorithm and artificial neural network for wing preliminary computation.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 84 (Jan): 464–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2018.09.043.
Cook, P. H., M. A. McDonald, and M. C. P. Firmin. 1979. Aerofoil RAE 2822-pressure distributions, and boundary layer and wake measurements. Experimental data base for computer program assessment. Madrid, Spain: Real Academia Española.
Della Vecchia, P., and F. Nicolosi. 2014. “Aerodynamic guidelines in the design and optimization of new regional turboprop aircraft.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 38 (Oct): 88–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2014.07.018.
Dillmann, A., G. Heller, M. Klaas, H. P. Kreplin, W. Nitsche, and W. Schröder. 2010. “New results in numerical and experimental fluid mechanics VII.” In Proc., Contributions to the 16th STAB/DGLR Symp. Aachen, Germany: Springer.
Ebrahimi, M., and A. Jahangirian. 2017. “Accelerating global optimization of aerodynamic shapes using a new surrogate-assisted parallel genetic algorithm.” Eng. Optim. 49 (12): 2079–2094. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2017.1289741.
Gen, M., and R. Cheng. 1999. Genetic algorithms and engineering optimization. New York: Wiley.
Goldberg, D. E. 1989. Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Hashimoto, A., S. Jeong, and S. Obayashi. 2015. “Aerodynamic optimization of near-future high-wing aircraft.” Trans. Jpn. Soc. Aeronaut. Space Sci. 58 (2): 73–82. https://doi.org/10.2322/tjsass.58.73.
Holland, J. H. 1992. Adaptation in natural and artificial systems: An introductory analysis with applications to biology, control, and artificial intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Konak, A., D. W. Coit, and A. E. Smith. 2006. “Multi-objective optimization using genetic algorithms: A tutorial.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 91 (9): 992–1007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2005.11.018.
Kota, S., R. Osborn, G. Ervin, D. Maric, P. Flick, and D. Paul. 2009. “Mission adaptive compliant wing–design, fabrication and flight test.” In Proc., RTO Applied Vehicle Technology Panel (AVT) Symp., 1–18. Brussels, Belgium: NATO.
Mattos, B., R. Papa, and L. C. Santos. 2004. “Considerations about forward fuselage aerodynamic design of a transport aircraft.” In Proc., 42nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 1241. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Nicolai, L. M., and G. E. Carichner. 2010. Fundamentals of aircraft and airship design, Volume 1–Aircraft design. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Nicolosi, F., P. Della Vecchia, and D. Ciliberti. 2013. “An investigation on vertical tailplane contribution to aircraft sideforce.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 28 (1): 401–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2012.12.006.
Nicolosi, F., P. Della Vecchia, D. Ciliberti, and V. Cusati. 2016. “Fuselage aerodynamic prediction methods.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 55 (Aug): 332–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2016.06.012.
Potty, V., S. Angelo, P. S. Rao, and G. Srinivas. 2019. “Recent developments of an aircraft fuselage along theoretical, experimental and numerical approach: A review.” Universal J. Mech. Eng. 7 (6): 21–28. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujme.2019.071403.
Rao, S. S. 2019. Engineering optimization: Theory and practice. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Roskam, J. 1986. Airplane design. Pt. 3. Layout design of cockpit, fuselage, wing and empennage: Cutaways and inboard profiles. Ottawa, KS: Roskam Aviation and Engineering.
Sadraey, M. H. 2012. Aircraft design: A systems engineering approach. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Samareh, J. A. 2001. “Survey of shape parameterization techniques for high-fidelity multidisciplinary shape optimization.” AIAA J. 39 (5): 877–884. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.1391.
Shahrokhi, A., and A. Jahangirian. 2007. “Airfoil shape parameterization for optimum Navier–Stokes design with genetic algorithm.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 11 (6): 443–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2007.04.004.
Shahrokhi, A., and A. Jahangirian. 2010. “A surrogate assisted evolutionary optimization method with application to the transonic airfoil design.” Eng. Optim. 42 (6): 497–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/03052150903305468.
Skorupa, A., and M. Skorupa. 2012. Riveted lap joints in aircraft fuselage: Design, analysis and properties. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Sóbester, A., and A. I. Forrester. 2014. Aircraft aerodynamic design: geometry and optimization. Philadelphia, PA: John Wiley & Sons.
Srinivas, N., and K. Deb. 1994. “Muiltiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms.” Evol. Comput. 2 (3): 221–248. https://doi.org/10.1162/evco.1994.2.3.221.
van Tooren, M., and L. Krakers. 2007. “Multi-disciplinary design of aircraft fuselage structures.” In Proc., 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 767. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Welstead, J., B. Reitz, and G. Crouse. 2012. “Modeling fuselage aerodynamic effects in aircraft design optimization.” In Proc., 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, 394. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 35 • Issue 6 • November 2022
Copyright
© 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 17, 2021
Accepted: Jun 29, 2022
Published online: Sep 8, 2022
Published in print: Nov 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Feb 8, 2023
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Jacek Czarnigowski, Michał Trendak, Aircraft piston engine load distribution in steady state operating conditions, Combustion Engines, 10.19206/CE-160505, (2023).