Suppression of Low-Reynolds-Number Flow Separation by Controlling the Laminar Separation Bubble with Intermittent Disturbance
Publication: Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 35, Issue 5
Abstract
The formation of a laminar separation bubble (LSB) at low Reynolds numbers has a significant impact on the aerodynamic performance of an airfoil. An experimental study was conducted to investigate the feasibility of using an intermittent disturbance control method to maintain the stability of this LSB, aiming to suppress the flow separation on a National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) 633-421 airfoil model at a low Reynolds () number. The dynamic bursting process of the LSB at and was reproduced using this flow-control method. During the experiments, dynamic pressure measurements and particle image velocimetry were used to examine the upper-surface pressure distribution and partial flow field of the airfoil model, respectively. It was found that during the bursting process, the LSB could naturally exist for an initial short time period, defined as , and the laminar separated shear layer kept moving away from the surface, leading to bursting of the LSB as well as a stall. By making use of , an interval time for the disturbances, , was roughly determined and used as the control period for flow disturbances produced from synthetic jet actuators. This intermittent disturbance can interrupt the further development of the natural bursting process of the LSB and trigger a cycle of rebirth of the LSB, forming a stable LSB on the airfoil. A power spectrum of the dynamic pressure measurements at the reattachment point showed that the intermittent frequency dominated the reattachment frequency of the separated shear layer.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the National Numerical Wind Tunnel Project, National Natural Science Foundation Program of China (Grant No.11972017) and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions. The authors also thank Wei Zuo for his previous research work and valuable comments in the follow-up study, and Shuai Luo and Zi Huang for their help in the experiment in the present study.
References
Amitay, M., and A. Glezer. 2002. “Controlled transients of flow reattachment over stalled airfoils.” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 23 (Jun): 690–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-727X(02)00165-0.
Arena, A. V., and T. J. Mueller. 1980. “Laminar separation, transition, and turbulent reattachment near the leading edge of airfoils.” AIAA J. 18 (7): 747–753. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.50815.
Asada, K., T. Nonomura, H. Aono, M. Sato, K. Okada, and K. Fujii. 2015. “LES of transient flows controlled by DBD plasma actuator over a stalled airfoil.” Int. J. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 29 (3–5): 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/10618562.2015.1032271.
Bai, P., E. J. Cui, F. Li, and W. J. Zhou. 2006a. “Study of the nonlinear lift coefficient of the symmetrical airfoil at low Reynolds number near the zero angle of attack.” [In Chinese.] Chin. J. Theor. Appl. Mech. 1 (May): 1–8.
Bai, P., E. J. Cui, W. J. Zhou, and F. Li. 2006b. “Numerical simulation of laminar separation bubble over 2D airfoil at low Reynolds number.” Acta Aerodyn. Sin. 24 (2): 416–424.
Bai, P., F. Li, and H. L. Zhan. 2015. “Study about the nonlinear and unsteady laminar separation phenomena around the airfoil at low Reynolds number with low incidence.” Sci. Sin.-Phys. Mech. Astron. 45 (Sep): 024703.
Benton, S. I., and M. Visbal. 2016. “Investigation of high-frequency separation control mechanisms for delay of unsteady separation.” In Proc., 8th AIAA Flow Control Conf. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Bevington, P. R., and D. K. Robinson. 2003. Data reduction and error analysis for the physical sciences. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Bons, J., R. Sondergaard, and R. Rivir. 2001. “Turbine separation control using pulsed vortex generator jets.” J. Turbomach. 123 (2): 198–206. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1350410.
Bons, J., R. Sondergaard, and R. Rivir. 2002. “The fluid dynamics of LPT blade separation control using pulsed jets.” J. Turbomach. 124 (1): 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1425392.
Brendel, M., and T. J. Mueller. 1988. “Boundary-layer measurements on an aerofoil at low Reynolds number.” J. Aircr. 25 (7): 612–617. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45631.
Coull, J., and H. Hodson. 2011. “Unsteady boundary-layer transition in low-pressure turbines.” J. Fluid Mech. 681 (2): 370–410. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2011.204.
Crowther, W. J. 2006. “Control of separation on a trailing edge flap using air jet vortex generators.” J. Aircr. 43 (5): 1589–1593. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.15755.
Dong, H., T. Xia, L. Chen, S. Liu, Y. D. Cui, B. C. Khoo, and A. Zhao. 2019. “Study on flow separation and transition of the airfoil in low Reynolds number.” Phys. Fluids 31 (1): 103601. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5118736.
Dovgal, A. V., V. V. Kozlov, and A. Michalke. 1994. “Laminar boundary-layer separation: Instability and associated phenomena.” Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 30 (1): 61–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-0421(94)90003-5.
Feero, M. A., S. D. Goodfellow, and P. Lavoie. 2014. “Flow reattachment using synthetic jet actuation on a low-Reynolds-number airfoil.” AIAA J. 53 (7): 2005–2014. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J053605.
Gao, D., H. Meng, Y. Huang, G. Chen, and W. Chen. 2021. “Active flow control of the dynamic wake behind a square cylinder using combined jets at the front and rear stagnation points.” Phys. Fluids 33 (May): 047101. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043191.
Gaster, M. 1969. The structure and behavior of laminar separation bubbles. London: Aeronautical Research Council Reports and Memoranda.
Godard, G., and M. Stanislas. 2006a. “Control of a decelerating boundary layer. Part 1: Optimisation of passive vortex generators.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 10 (3): 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2005.11.007.
Godard, G., and M. Stanislas. 2006b. “Control of a decelerating boundary layer. Part 3: Optimisation of round jets vortex generators.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 10 (6): 455–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2005.11.005.
Gu, Y. S., B. B. Li, and K. M. Cheng. 2010. “Cross flow transfer characteristics of a new beveled synthetic jet actuator and its applications to boundary layer control.” Acta Aeronaut. Astronaut. Sin. 31 (2): 231–237.
Gui, L., J. Longo, and F. Stern. 2001. “Towing tank PIV measurement system, data and uncertainty assessment for DTMB Model 5512.” Exp. Fluids 31 (3): 336–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003480100293.
He, M. J. 2018. Aerodynamic hysteresis loop and flow control on a rectangular wing at low Reynolds numbers. Nanjing, China: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Hodson, H., and R. Howell. 2005. “The role of transition in high-lift low-pressure turbines for aeroengines.” Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 41 (Apr): 419–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2005.08.001.
Hong, M. H., S. Y. Cheng, and S. Zhong. 2020. “Effect of geometric parameters on synthetic jet: A review.” Phys. Fluids 32 (1): 031301. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5142408.
Horton, H. P. 1968. “Laminar separation bubbles in two and three dimensional incompressible flow.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Aeronautical Engineering, Univ. of London.
Huang, G., Y. Dai, C. Yang, Y. Wu, and Y. Xia. 2021. “Effect of dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuator on the dynamic moment behavior of pitching airfoil at low Reynolds number.” Phys. Fluids 33 (Mar): 043603. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0048235.
Jabbal, M. 2012. Development of design methodology for synthetic jet actuator array for flow separation control applications, 2012–3242. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Lambert, A., and S. Yarusevych. 2019. “Effect of angle of attack on vortex dynamics in laminar separation bubbles.” Phys. Fluids 31 (62): 064105. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5100158.
Lin, J. C. M., and L. L. Pauley. 1996. “Low-Reynolds-number separation on an airfoil.” AIAA J. 34 (8): 1570–1577. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.13273.
Lissaman, P. B. S. 1983. “Low-Reynolds-number airfoils.” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 15 (Aug): 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fl.15.010183.001255.
Liu, Q., Z. Liu, P. Bai, and F. Li. 2016. “Numerical study about aerodynamic characteristics and flow field structures for a skin of airfoil with active oscillation at low Reynolds number.” Chin. J. Theor. Appl. Mech. 48 (2): 269–277.
Meng, X. S., Z. R. Yang, and Q. Chen. 2016. “Laminar separation control at low Reynolds numbers using plasma actuation.” Acta Aeronaut. Astronaut. Sin. 37 (7): 2112–2122.
Mueller, T. J., and S. M. Batil. 1982. “Experimental studies of separation on a two dimensional airfoil at low Reynolds numbers.” AIAA J. 20 (4): 457–463. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.51095.
Mueller, T. J., and J. D. DeLaurier. 2003. “Aerodynamics of small vehicles.” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 35 (Sep): 89–111. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.35.101101.161102.
Pandi, J. S. S., and S. Mittal. 2019. “Wake transitions and laminar separation bubble in the flow past an Eppler 61 airfoil.” Phys. Fluids 31 (Jan): 114102. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5113823.
Raffel, M., C. E. Willert, F. Scarano, C. J. Kähler, S. T. Wereley, and J. Kompenhans. 2018. “PIV uncertainty and measurement accuracy.” In Particle image velocimetry. Berlin: Springer.
Smith, D., M. Amitay, and V. Kibens. 1998. “Modification of lifting body aerodynamics using synthetic jet actuators.” In Proc., 36th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Stanislas, M., K. Okamoto, and C. J. Kähler. 2005. “Main results of the second international PIV challenge.” Exp. Fluids 39 (Sep): 170–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-005-0951-2.
Stieger, R., and H. Hodson. 2004. “The transition mechanism of highly loaded low-pressure turbine blades.” J. Turbomach. 126 (4): 536–543. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1773850.
Wahidi, R., and D. H. Bridges. 2012. “Effects of distributed suction on an airfoil at low Reynolds number.” AIAA J. 50 (3): 523–539. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J050913.
Wang, Q., K. Cheng, Y. Gu, and Z. Li. 2018. “Continuous control of asymmetric forebody vortices in a bi-stable state.” Phys. Fluids 30 (Apr): 024102. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5000006.
Yang, R., K. Xu, D. Zhong, and N. Ge. 2019. “Numerical study on laminar separation control using dynamic hump in high-loaded low pressure turbine cascade at low-Reynolds number.” J. Propul. Technol. 40 (2): 267–275.
Yarusevych, S., P. E. Sullivan, and J. G. Kawall. 2009. “On vortex shedding from an airfoil in low-Reynolds-number flows.” J. Fluid Mech. 632 (Sep): 245–271. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112009007058.
Zhang, M. M., G. F. Wang, and J. Z. Xu. 2013. “Aerodynamic control of low-Reynolds-number airfoil with leading-edge protuberances.” AIAA J. 51 (8): 1960–1971. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J052319.
Zhou, Y., and Z. J. Wang. 2012. “Effects of surface roughness on separated and transitional flows over a wing.” AIAA J. 50 (3): 593–609. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J051237.
Zuo, W. 2015. “Aerodynamic Characteristics and Flow Control on a Rectangular Wing at Low Reynolds Numbers.” M.D. thesis, Dept. of Aerodynamic, Nanjing Univ. of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Zuo, W., Y. S. Gu, and Q. T. Wang. 2016. “Aerodynamic characteristics and flow control on a rectangular wing at low Reynolds number.” Acta Aeronaut. Astronaut. Sin. 37 (4): 1139–1147.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 13, 2021
Accepted: Apr 11, 2022
Published online: Jul 1, 2022
Published in print: Sep 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Dec 1, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.