Abstract

We discuss a methodology for multiobjective optimization of the U-shaped air-delivery duct, which is a part of a turboprop engine intake system. The methodology combines and extends existing techniques to optimize the real-world engineering problem efficiently. The procedure utilizes Kriging models for the approximation of objective functions. We use the Expected Hypervolume Improvement method for improving the Kriging models accuracy and creating the Pareto front. The calculations are parallel and asynchronous, allowing to reduce the time needed for finding the optimal designs. The algorithm is resistant to solver failures and mesh issues. We perform the optimization with a purpose to satisfy two objectives: reduction of a total pressure loss across the duct and improvement/not-worsening of a distortion coefficient at the duct outlet. To obtain the improvement, we modify the shape of the duct within limits to fulfill geometric constraints. We use 30 design variables to control the deformation of the duct surface based on radial basis function interpolation.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available in a repository or online in accordance with funder data retention policies (Łaniewski-Wołłk 2016, “ASynchronious Efficient Multiobjective Optimization,” GitHub repository, https://github.com/llaniewski/ASEMOO).
Some or all data, models, or code used during the study were provided by a third party (the base design of the air-delivery duct). Direct requests for these materials may be made to the provider as indicated in the Acknowledgments.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank W. Stalewski and J. Żółtak, who provided the base design of the air-delivery duct (Stalewski and Żółtak 2014). This work was partly prepared under the ESPOSA (Grant No. FP7-AAT-2011-RTD01 284859) and UMRIDA (Grant No. ACP3-GA-2013-605036) projects.

References

Alessi, G., L. Koloszar, T. Verstraete, and J. P. A. J. van Beeck. 2019. “Node-based adjoint surface optimization of u-bend duct for pressure loss reduction.” Comput. Methods Appl. Sci. 49: 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89890-2_5.
Aranake, A., J. G. Lee, D. Knight, R. Cummings, J. Cox, M. Paul, and A. Byerley. 2011. “Automated design optimization of a three-dimensional subsonic diffuser.” J. Propul. Power 27: 838–846. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.50522.
Bae, H., S. Park, and J. Kwon. 2012. “Efficient global optimization for S-duct diffuser shape design.” J. Aerosp. Eng. 227 (9): 1516–1532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410012457891.
Bradstreet, L. 2011. “The hypervolume indicator for multi-objective optimisation: Calculation and use.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Western Australia. https://research-repository.uwa.edu.au/en/publications/the-hypervolume-indicator-for-multi-objective-optimisation-calcul.
Carnell, R. 2016. “LHS: Latin hypercube samples.” R package version 0.14. Accessed April 30, 2020. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lhs.
Chiereghin, N., L. Guglielmi, M. Savill, E. Manca, A. Rigobello, M. Barison, and E. Benin. 2017. “Shape optimization of a curved duct with free form deformations.” In Proc., 23rd AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conf. Denver: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
D’Ambros, A., T. Kipouros, P. Zachos, M. Savill, and E. Benini. 2018. “Computational design optimization for S-ducts.” Designs 2 (4): 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/designs2040036.
Desautels, T., A. Krause, and J. W. Burdick. 2014. “Parallelizing exploration-exploitation tradeoffs in gaussian process bandit optimization.” J. Mach. Learn. Res. 15: 4053–4103.
Emmerich, M. 2005. “Single- and multi-objective evolutionary design optimization assisted by gaussian random field metamodels.” Ph.D. thesis, TU Dortmund. http://hdl.handle.net/2003/21807.
Fonseca, C., L. Paquete, and M. Lopez-Ibanez. 2006. “An improved dimension-sweep algorithm for the hypervolume indicator.” In Proc., 2006 IEEE Int. Conf. on Evolutionary Computation. Vancouver, Canada: IEEE.
Furlan, F., N. Chiereghin, T. Kipouros, E. Benini, and M. Savill. 2014. “Computational design of S-duct intakes for distributed propulsion.” Aircr. Eng. Aerosp. Technol. Int. J. 86 (6): 473–477. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEAT-04-2014-0046.
Gan, W., and X. Zhang. 2017. “Design optimization of a three-dimensional diffusing S-duct using amodified SST turbulent model.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 63 (Apr): 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2016.12.016.
Ginsbourger, D., R. L. Riche, and L. Carraro. 2010. “Kriging is well-suited to parallelize optimization.” In Vol. 2 of Computational intelligence in expensive optimization problems: Adaptation learning and optimization, edited by Y. Tenne and C. Goh. Berlin: Springer.
Girdziusas, R., R. L. Riche, F. Viale, and D. Ginsbourger. 2012. “Parallel budgeted optimization applied to the design of an air duct.” Accessed March 5, 2020. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00723427.
Hupkens, I., A. Deutz, K. Yang, and M. Emmerich. 2015. “Faster exact algorithms for computing expected hypervolume improvement.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization, 65–79. New York: Springer.
Janusevskis, J., R. L. Riche, D. Ginsbourger, and R. Girdziusas. 2012. “Expected improvements for the asynchronous parallel global optimization of expensive functions: Potentials and challenges.” In Learning and intelligent optimization, edited by Y. Hamadi and M. Schoenauer. Berlin: Springer.
Jones, D. R., M. Schonlau, and W. J. Welch. 1998. “Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions.” J. Global Optim. 13: 455–492. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008306431147.
Joseph, V. R., E. Gul, and S. Ba. 2015. “Maximum projection designs for computer experiments.” Biometrika 102 (2): 371–380. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/asv002.
Krige, D. G. 1951. “A statistical approach to some basic mine valuation problems on the witwatersrand.” J. Chem. Metall. Min. Soc. S. Afr. 52: 119–139.
Łaniewski-Wołłk, Ł. 2010. “Expected hypervolume improvement—Criterion for kriging based multiobjective optimization.” In Proc., 19th Polish National Fluid Dynamics Conf. Poznań, Poland: Polish Academy of Sciences, Committee of Mechanics.
Łaniewski-Wołłk, Ł. 2013. “Automatic parametrization and mesh deformation for CFD optimization (November).” Accessed November 25, 2013. http://arxiv.org/abs/1311.6190v1.
Łaniewski-Wołłk, Ł. 2016. “Asynchronious efficient multiobjective optimization.” Accessed October 2, 2017. https://github.com/llaniewski/ASEMOO.
Mersmann, O., H. Trautmann, D. Steuer, B. Bischl, and K. Deb. 2014. “MCO: Multiple criteria optimization algorithms and related functions.” Accessed April 30, 2020. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=mco.
Mockus, J., V. Tiesis, and A. Zilinskas. 1978. “L. c. w. dixon and g. p. szego.” In Towards global optimisation, 117–129. Amsterdam, Netherlands: North Holland.
Mokhtarzadeh-Dehghan, M., and Y. Yuan. 2002. “Measurements of turbulence quantities and bursting period in developing turbulent boundary layers on the concave and convex walls of a 90° square bend.” Exp. Therm Fluid Sci. 27: 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0894-1777(02)00213-3.
Namgoong, H., C. Son, and P. Ireland. 2008. “U-bend shaped turbine blade cooling passage optimization.” In Proc., 12th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conf. Victoria, Canada: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Parr, J. M. 2013. “Improvement criteria for constraint handling and multiobjective optimization.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Southampton. https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/349978/1/JPARR-Thesis.pdf.
Raghavan, B., and P. Breitkopf. 2013. “Asynchronous evolutionary shape optimization based on high-quality surrogates: Application to an air-conditioning duct.” Eng. Comput. 29: 467–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-012-0263-0.
Rasmussen, C. E., and C. K. I. Williams. 2006. Gaussian processes for machine learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Roustant, O., D. Ginsbourger, and Y. Deville. 2012. “Dicekriging, diceoptim: Two R packages for the analysis of computer experiments by kriging-based metamodeling and optimization.” J. Stat. Software 51 (1): 54. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v051.i01.
Sacher, M., R. Duvigneau, O. L. Maître, M. Durand, Élisa Berrini, F. Hauville, and J.-A. Astolfi. 2018. “A classification approach to efficient global optimization in presence of non-computable domains.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 58 (4): 1537–1557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-1981-8.
Schonlau, M. 1997. “Computer experiments and global optimization.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Waterloo. https://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk3/ftp04/nq22234.pdf.
Shahriari, B., K. Swersky, Z. Wang, R. Adams, and N. de Freitas. 2015. “Taking the human out of the loop: A review of bayesian optimization.” Proc. IEEE 104 (1): 148–175. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2015.2494218.
Smirnov, P., and F. Menter. 2009. “Sensitization of the SST turbulence model to rotation and curvature by applying the Spalart-Shur correction term.” J. Turbomach. 131 (4): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3070573.
Soemarwoto, B. I., O. J. Boelens, and T. Kanakis. 2016. “Aerodynamic design of gas turbine engine intake duct.” Aircr. Eng. Aerosp. Technol. 88 (5): 605–612. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEAT-02-2015-0063.
Stalewski, W., and J. Żółtak. 2014. “The preliminary design of the air-intake system and the nacelle in the small aircraft-engine integration process.” Aircr. Eng. Aerosp. Technol. Int. J. 86 (3): 250–258. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEAT-01-2013-0015.
Stein, M. 1987. “Large sample properties of simulations using Latin hypercube sampling.” Technometrics 29: 143–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1987.10488205.
Stocki, R. 2005. “A method to improve design reliability using optimal Latin hypercube sampling.” Comput. Assisted Mech. Eng. Sci. 12: 87–105.
Storn, R., and K. Price. 1997. “Differential evolution—A simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces.” J. Global Optim. 11: 341–359. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008202821328.
Tran, A., J. Sun, J. M. Furlan, K. V. Pagalthivarthi, R. J. Visintainer, and Y. Wang. 2019. “pbo-2gp-3b: A batch parallel known/unknown constrained Bayesian optimization with feasibility classification and its applications in computational fluid dynamics.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 347 (Apr): 827–852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2018.12.033.
Venturelli, G., and E. Benini. 2016. “Kriging-assisted design optimization of S-shape supersonic compressor cascades.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 58 (Nov): 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2016.08.021.
Verstraete, T., F. Coletti, J. Bulle, T. Vanderwielen, and T. Arts. 2013. “Optimization of a U-bend for minimal pressure loss in internal cooling channels. Part 1: Numerical method.” J. Turbomach. 135 (5): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4023030.
Verstraete, T., and J. Li. 2013. “Multi-objective optimization of a u-bend for minimal pressure loss and maximal heat transfer performance in internal cooling channels.” In Proc., ASME Turbo Expo 2013: Turbine Technical Conf. and Exposition. San Antonio: ASME.
Yang, K., M. Emmerich, A. Deutz, and C. M. Fonseca. 2017. “Computing 3-D expected hypervolume improvement and related integrals in asymptotically optimal time.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization, 685–700. New York: Springer.
Zerbinati, A., J.-A. Désidéri, and R. Duvigneau. 2012. Application of metamodel-assisted multiple-gradient descent algorithm (MGDA) to air-cooling duct shape optimization. Vienna, Austria: European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 33Issue 4July 2020

History

Received: Jun 18, 2019
Accepted: Feb 24, 2020
Published online: May 13, 2020
Published in print: Jul 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Oct 13, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Warsaw Univ. of Technology, Faculty of Power and Aeronautical Engineering, Institute of Aeronautics and Applied Mechanics, Nowowiejska 24, 00-665 Warsaw, Poland (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0751-9035. Email: [email protected]
Warsaw Univ. of Technology, Faculty of Power and Aeronautical Engineering, Institute of Aeronautics and Applied Mechanics, Nowowiejska 24, 00-665 Warsaw, Poland. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3026-5881. Email: [email protected]
Sławomir Kubacki, Ph.D. [email protected]
Warsaw Univ. of Technology, Faculty of Power and Aeronautical Engineering, Institute of Aeronautics and Applied Mechanics, Nowowiejska 24, 00-665 Warsaw, Poland. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share