Performance Evaluation of External and Mixed Compression Supersonic Air Intakes: Parametric Study
Publication: Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 32, Issue 5
Abstract
This research computationally evaluates the performance variations of two common types of supersonic air intakes, external and mixed compression, due to changes in the geometries of the intakes as well as some flow conditions. A computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solver was developed by the authors and used to simulate the compressible, two-dimensional (2D), and turbulent flow inside and around the supersonic air intakes. The main objective of this paper is to evaluate the role of geometric parameters, including spike angle, exit area, overall intake length, and flow parameters, such as the flight Mach number and back pressure ratio (BPR), on the performance of the intakes. Total pressure recovery (TPR), mass flow ratio (MFR), flow distortion (FD), and drag coefficient () were considered as the performance factors of the supersonic intakes. The results indicated that increments of BPR had desirable effects on the performance of the intakes at supercritical conditions, and increments of the free-stream Mach number deteriorated the performance of both intakes. FD was the most sensitive parameter to the geometric variations, while TPR and MFR were almost unchanged. In addition, the superiority of the mixed compression intake was shown in terms of lower drag coefficient and FD in comparison with the external compression intake.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This study was financially supported by Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (FUM), Iran (Grant No. 46235).
References
Aziz, M. A., H. Elbanna, and M. M. Abdulrahaman. 2013. “High fidelity design optimization of a three dimension supersonic intake.” In Proc., 43rd Fluid Dynamics Conf. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Bourdeau, C., G. Carrier, D. Knight, and K. Rasheed. 1999. “Three dimensional optimization of supersonic inlets.” In Proc., 35th Joint Propulsion Conf. and Exhibit. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Das, S., and J. Prasad. 2009. “Cowl deflection angle in a supersonic air intake.” Defence Sci. J. 59 (2): 99–105. https://doi.org/10.14429/dsj.59.1496.
Das, S., and J. Prasad. 2010. “Unstart suppression and performance analysis of supersonic air-intake adopting bleed and cowl bending.” J. Inst. Eng. (India): Aerosp. Eng. J. 91: 27–35.
Dawei, W., and G. Rongwei. 2007. “Experimental investigation of a fixed-geometry two-dimensional mixed-compression supersonic inlet with sweep-forward high- light and bleed slot in an inverted “X”-type layout.” China. J. Aeronaut. 20 (4): 304–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1000-9361(07)60048-X.
Gokhale, S. S., and V. R. Kumar. 2001. “Numerical computations of supersonic inlet flow.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 36 (5): 597–617. https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.147.
Holland, S. D. 1993. Computational parametric study of sidewall-compression scramjet inlet performance at Mach 10. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Liang, J.-H., X.-Q. Fan, Y. Wang, and W.-D. Liu. 2008. “Performance enhancement of three-dimensional hypersonic inlet with sidewall compression.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng.: J. Aerosp. Eng. 222 (8): 1211–1219. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544100JAERO334.
Nair, M. T., N. Kumar, and S. K. Saxena. 2005. “Computational analysis of inlet aerodynamics for a hypersonic research vehicle.” J. Propul. Power 21 (2): 286–291. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.2839.
Ran, H., and D. Mavris. 2005. “Preliminary design of a 2D supersonic inlet to maximize total pressure recovery.” In Proc., AIAA 5th ATIO and 16th Lighter-Than-Air Systems Technology and Balloon Systems Conf. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Seddon, J., and E. L. Goldsmith. 1985. Intake aerodynamics. London: Collins.
Sepahi-Younsi, J., and B. Forouzi Feshalami. 2017. “Investigation of corner rounding effects on the performance of a supersonic air intake.” In Proc., 16th Int. Conf. of Iranian Aerospace Society. Tehran, Iran: Iranian Aerospace Society.
Sepahi-Younsi, J., and B. Forouzi Feshalami. 2018. “Effects of geometric and non-geometric parameters on the performance of a supersonic air intake.” in press.
Singh, R. K., S. N. Singh, and V. Seshadri. 2008. “Effect of corner rounding on the performance of the double offset Y-shaped aircraft intake duct.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng.: J. Aerosp. Eng. 222 (7): 969–983. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544100JAERO368.
Soltani, M. R., A. Daliri, and J. Sepahi-Younsi. 2016. “Effects of shock wave/boundary-layer interaction on performance and stability of a mixed-compression inlet.” Sci. Iranica Trans. B Mech. Eng. 23 (4): 1811–1825. https://doi.org/10.24200/SCI.2016.3928.
Soltani, M. R., and M. Farahani. 2012. “Performance study of an inlet in supersonic flow.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng.: J. Aerosp. Eng. 227 (1): 159–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410011426672.
Soltani, M. R., M. Farahani, and J. Sepahi-Younsi. 2011. “Performance study of a supersonic inlet in the presence of a heat source.” Sci. Iranica 18 (3): 375–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scient.2011.05.027.
Soltani, M. R., J. Sepahi-Younsi, and M. Farahani. 2011. “Investigation of a new flux scheme for the numerical simulation of the supersonic intake flow.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part G: J. Aerosp. Eng. 226 (11): 1445–1454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410011422634.
Soltani, M. R., J. Sepahi-Younsi, and M. Farahani. 2015a. “Effects of boundary-layer bleed parameters on supersonic intake performance.” J. Propul. Power 31 (3): 826–836. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B35461.
Soltani, M. R., J. Sepahi-Younsi, M. Farahani, and A. Masoud. 2012. “Numerical simulation and parametric study of a supersonic intake.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng.: J. Aerosp. Eng. 227 (3): 467–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410012436620.
Soltani, M. R., J. Sepahi-Younsi, and V. F. Khanaposhtani. 2015b. “Numerical investigation of the unstart suppression in a supersonic air intake.” Iranian J. Sci. a Technol. Trans. Mech. Eng. 39 (M2): 413–426. https://doi.org/10.22099/IJSTM.2015.3249.
Thangadpai, G. R. S., B. S. Chandran, V. Babu, and T. Sundararajan. 2004. “Numerical investigation of the intake flow characteristics for a ramjet engine with and without heat addition in the combustion chamber.” Defence Sci. J. 54 (1): 3–16. https://doi.org/10.14429/dsj.54.2016.
Xiong, C., Z. Ya, Z. Changsheng, and J. Yutao. 2005. “Numerical simulation on ramjet inlet with different cowl leading edge.” In Proc., 35th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conf. and Exhibit. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Xu, X., X. Dajun, and C. Guobiao. 2005. “Optimization design for scramjet and analysis of its operation performance.” Acta Astronaut. 57 (2): 390–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2005.03.006.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2019 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 14, 2018
Accepted: Mar 14, 2019
Published online: Jun 3, 2019
Published in print: Sep 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Nov 3, 2019
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.