Technical Papers
Aug 29, 2018

In Situ Data Analysis for Condition Assessment of an Existing Prestressed Concrete Bridge

Publication: Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 31, Issue 6

Abstract

Condition assessment of existing bridge structures is a valuable tool for bridge owners to make reasonable and optimal maintenance and management decisions. Structural condition assessment based on monitoring data is well-recognized within the civil engineering community as an efficient method to understand structural behavior and performance. One of the significant issues related to structural health monitoring is how to accurately interpret monitoring data in order to provide reliable condition assessment results. In this study, monitoring data obtained from a structural health monitoring system installed on an existing three-span prestressed concrete bridge are analyzed for condition assessment. The central span of the bridge contains eight precast post-tensioned girders with half joints, which are located at the ends of cantilevered lengths of the side girders. The half joints also contain external strengthening. The objective of this study is to conduct purely data-based investigations to explore the feasibility of using several condition indicators to identify any changes occurring to the bridge condition. These indicators include the maximum strain responses in the girders and vertical strengthening rods of half joints, transverse moment-distribution factors, and neutral-axis locations. Measured strain data from a number of events recorded from the structural health monitoring (SHM) system are analyzed, and the distribution as well as statistical characteristics of the afore-mentioned indicators are considered for bridge condition assessment.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This paper was supported by an Australian Research Council Linkage Project. The authors also thankfully acknowledge the support and permission granted by Main Roads Western Australia to publish the information in this study. Conclusions drawn from the data provided by MRWA are those of the authors based on the analyses/evaluations conducted and do not necessarily represent the views of MRWA. The authors also appreciate the support and assistance from Mahes Rajakaruna and Adam Lim at MRWA.

References

Brownjohn, J. M. W., A. A. Dumanoglu, and R. T. Severn. 1992. “Ambient vibration survey of the fatih sultan mehmet (second Bosporus) suspension bridge.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 21 (10): 907–924. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290211005.
Brownjohn, J. M. W., P. Moyo, P. Omenzetter, and Y. Lu. 2003. “Assessment of highway bridge upgrading by dynamic testing and finite-element model updating.” J. Bridge Eng. 8 (3): 162–172. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2003)8:3(162).
Carden, E. P., and P. Fanning. 2004. “Vibration based condition monitoring: A review.” Struct. Health Monit. 3 (4): 355–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921704047500.
Cardini, A. J., and J. T. Dewolf. 2009. “Long-term structural health monitoring of a multi-girder steel composite bridge using strain data.” Struct. Health Monit. 8 (1): 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921708094789.
Catbas, F. N., and A. E. Aktan. 2002. “Condition and damage assessment: Issues and some promising indices.” J. Struct. Eng. 128 (8): 1026–1036. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:8(1026).
Chen, Z., W. Yang, J. Li, Q. Cheng, and Q. Cai. 2017. “A systematic method from influence line identification to damage detection: Application to RC bridges.” Comput. Concr. 20 (5): 563–572. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2017.20.5.563.
Chen, Z. W., Q. L. Cai, and J. Li. 2016. “Stress influence line identification of long suspension bridges installed with structural health monitoring systems.” Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn. 16 (4): 1640023. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021945541640023X.
Duan, Z., G. Yan, J. Ou, and B. F. Spencer. 2007. “Damage detection in ambient vibration using proportional flexibility matrix with incomplete measured DOFs.” Struct. Control Health Monit. 14 (2): 186–196. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.149.
Follen, C. W., M. Sanayei, B. R. Brenner, and R. M. Vogel. 2014. “Statistical bridge signatures.” J. Bridge Eng. 19 (7): 04014022. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000596.
Gangone, M. V., M. J. Whelan, and K. D. Janoyan. 2011. “Wireless monitoring of a multispan bridge superstructure for diagnostic load testing and system identification.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 26 (7): 560–579. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2010.00711.x.
Lee, J. J., and C. B. Yun. 2006. “Damage diagnosis of steel girder bridges using ambient vibration data.” Eng. Struct. 28 (6): 912–925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.10.017.
Li, J., H. Hao, and Z. W. Chen. 2017. “Damage identification and optimal sensor placement for structures under unknown traffic-induced vibrations.” J. Aerosp. Eng. 30 (2): B4015001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000550.
Li, J., H. Hao, and H. P. Zhu. 2014. “Dynamic assessment of shear connectors in composite bridges with ambient vibration measurements.” Adv. Struct. Eng. 17 (5): 617–637. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.17.5.617.
Ni, Y. Q., H. W. Xia, K. Y. Wong, and J. M. Ko. 2012. “In-service condition assessment of bridge deck using long-term monitoring data of strain response.” J. Bridge Eng. 17 (6): 876–885. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000321.
Olund, J., and J. DeWolf. 2007. “Passive structural health monitoring of Connecticut’s bridge infrastructure.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 13 (4): 330–339. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2007)13:4(330).
Phares, B., P. Lu, T. Wipf, and L. Greimann. 2013. “Field validation of a statistical-based bridge damage-detection algorithm.” J. Bridge Eng. 18 (11): 1227–1238. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000467.
Ren, W. X., and G. De Roeck. 2002. “Structural damage identification using modal data. II: Test verification.” J. Struct. Eng. 128 (1): 96–104. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:1(96).
Sanayei, M., J. E. Phelps, J. D. Sipple, E. S. Bell, and B. R. Brenner. 2012. “Instrumentation, nondestructive testing, and finite-element model updating for bridge evaluation using strain measurements.” J. Bridge Eng. 17 (1): 130–138. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000228.
Seo, J., J. W. Hu, and J. Lee. 2016. “Summary review of structural health monitoring applications for highway bridges.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 30 (4): 04015072. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000824.
Sigurdardottir, D. H., and B. Glisic. 2013. “Neutral axis as damage sensitive feature.” Smart Mater. Struct. 22 (7): 075030. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/22/7/075030.
Wang, N. B., L. X. He, W. X. Ren, and T. L. Huang. 2017. “Extraction of influence line through a fitting method from bridge dynamic response induced by a passing vehicle.” Eng. Struct. 151: 648–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.06.067.
Xia, Y., H. Hao, A. J. Deeks, and X. Q. Zhu. 2008. “Condition assessment of shear connectors in slab-girder bridges via vibration measurements.” J. Bridge Eng. 13 (1): 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2008)13:1(43).
Zanardo, G., H. Hao, Y. Xia, and A. J. Deeks. 2006. “Stiffness assessment through modal analysis of an RC slab bridge before and after strengthening.” J. Bridge Eng. 11 (5): 590–601. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2006)11:5(590).
Zaurin, R., and F. N. Catbas. 2009. “Integration of computer imaging and sensor data for structural health monitoring of bridges.” Smart Mater. Struct. 19 (1): 015019. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/19/1/015019.
Zhang, W., J. Li, H. Hao, and H. Ma. 2017. “Damage detection in bridge structures under moving loads with phase trajectory change of multi-type vibration measurements.” Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 87: 410–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.10.035.
Zhu, S., Z. Chen, Q. Cai, Y. Lei, and B. Chen. 2014. “Locate damage in long-span bridges based on stress influence lines and information fusion technique.” Adv. Struct. Eng. 17 (8): 1089–1102. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.17.8.1089.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 31Issue 6November 2018

History

Received: Oct 8, 2017
Accepted: May 15, 2018
Published online: Aug 29, 2018
Published in print: Nov 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Jan 29, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Yas Gunawardena [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, School of Civil, Environmental and Mining Engineering, Univ. of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia. Email: [email protected]
Farhad Aslani [email protected]
Senior Lecturer, School of Civil, Environmental and Mining Engineering, Univ. of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia. Email: [email protected]
Jun Li, M.ASCE [email protected]
Senior Lecturer, Centre for Infrastructure Monitoring and Protection, School of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Curtin Univ., Kent St., Bentley, WA 6102, Australia (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Hong Hao, F.ASCE [email protected]
John Curtin Distinguished Professor, Centre for Infrastructure Monitoring and Protection, School of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Curtin Univ., Kent St., Bentley, WA 6102, Australia; Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Guangzhou Univ., Guangzhou 510006, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share