Technical Papers
Jun 26, 2018

Lunar Ascent and Orbit Injection via Neighboring Optimal Guidance and Constrained Attitude Control

Publication: Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 31, Issue 5

Abstract

Future human or robotic missions to the Moon will require efficient ascent path and accurate orbit injection maneuvers, because the dynamical conditions at injection affect the subsequent phases of spaceflight. This research focuses on the original combination of two techniques applied to lunar ascent modules, i.e., (1) the recently introduced variable-time-domain neighboring optimal guidance (VTD-NOG), and (2) a constrained proportional-derivative (CPD) attitude control algorithm. VTD-NOG belongs to the class of feedback implicit guidance approaches aimed at finding the corrective control actions capable of maintaining the spacecraft sufficiently close to the reference trajectory. CPD pursues the desired attitude using thrust vector control while constraining the rate of the thrust deflection angle. The numerical results unequivocally demonstrate that the joint use of VTD-NOG and CPD represents an accurate and effective methodology for guidance and control of lunar ascent path and orbit injection in the presence of nonnominal flight conditions.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Afshari, H. H., A. B. Novinzadeh, and J. Roshanian. 2009. “Determination of nonlinear optimal feedback law for satellite injection problem using neighboring optimal control.” Am. J. Appl. Sci. 6 (3): 430–438. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2009.430.438.
Betts, J. T. 1998. “Survey of numerical methods for trajectory optimization.” J. Guid. Contr. Dyn. 21 (2): 193–207. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4231.
Celani, F. 2018. “Global and robust attitude control of a launch vehicle in exoatmospheric flight.” Aerosp. Sci. Tech. 74: 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2017.12.016.
Charalambous, C. B., S. N. Naidu, and J. L. Hibey. 1995. “Neighboring optimal trajectories for aeroassisted orbital transfer under uncertainties.” J. Guid. Contr. Dyn. 18 (3): 478–485. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.21412.
Conway, B. A. 2012. “A survey of methods available for the numerical optimization of continuous dynamic systems.” J. Opt. Theory Appl. 152 (2): 271–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-011-9918-z.
de Ruiter, A. H. J., C. J. Damaren, and J. R. Forbes. 2013. Spacecraft dynamics and control: An introduction, 293. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Enright, P. J., and B. A. Conway. 1991. “Optimal finite-thrust spacecraft trajectories using collocation and nonlinear programming.” J. Guid. Contr. Dyn. 14 (5): 981–985. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.20739.
Enright, P. J., and B. A. Conway. 1992. “Discrete approximations to optimal trajectories using direct transcription and nonlinear programming.” J. Guid. Contr. Dyn. 15 (4): 994–1002. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.20934.
Geller, D. K. 2006. “Linear covariance techniques for orbital rendezvous analysis and autonomous onboard mission planning.” J. Guid. Contr. Dyn. 29 (6): 1404–1414. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.19447.
Greensite, A. L. 1970. Control theory: Volume II. Analysis and design of space vehicle flight control systems, 175–192, 284–297. New York: Spartan Books.
Hull, D. G. 2003. Optimal control theory for applications, 199–254. New York: Springer International Edition.
Hull, D. G., and M. J. Nowak. 1993. “Neighboring suboptimal control for vehicle guidance.” In Proc., AAS/AIAA Space Flight Conf. Springfield, VA. American Astronautical Society.
Khalil, H. K. 2000. Nonlinear systems, 102–103. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Kugelmann, B., and H. J. Pesch. 1990a. “New general guidance method in constrained optimal control. Part 1: Numerical method.” J. Opt. Theory Appl. 67 (3): 421–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00939642.
Kugelmann, B., and H. J. Pesch. 1990b. “New general guidance method in constrained optimal control. Part 2: Application to space shuttle guidance.” J. Opt. Theory Appl. 67 (3): 437–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00939643.
Lam, Q. M., M. B. McFarland, M. Ruth, D. Drake, D. B. Ridgely, and M. W. Oppenheimer. 2008. “Adaptive guidance and control for space access vehicle subject to control surface failures.” In Proc., AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conf. and Exhibit. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Lu, P. 1991. “Optimal feedback control laws using nonlinear programming.” J. Opt. Theory Appl. 71 (3): 599–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00941406.
Marcos, A., L. F. Peñín, J. Sommer, and E. Bornschlegl. 2008. “Guidance and control design for the ascent phase of the hopper RLV.” In Proc., AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conf. and Exhibit. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Miele, A., and S. Mancuso. 2001. “Optimal trajectories for earth-moon-earth flight.” Acta Astron. 49 (2): 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-5765(01)00007-8.
Miele, A., and T. Wang. 1997. “Optimal trajectories for earth-to-mars flight.” J. Opt. Theory Appl. 95 (3): 467–499. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022661519758.
Pontani, M. 2016. “A new, general neighboring optimal guidance for aerospace vehicles.” In Variational analysis and aerospace engineering, 421–449. New York: Springer.
Pontani, M., G. Cecchetti, and P. Teofilatto. 2015a. “Variable-time-domain neighboring optimal guidance applied to space trajectories.” Acta Astron. 115: 102–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2015.05.020.
Pontani, M., G. Cecchetti, and P. Teofilatto. 2015b. “Variable-time-domain neighboring optimal guidance. Part 1: Algorithm structure.” J. Opt. Theory Appl. 166 (1): 76–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-014-0676-6.
Pontani, M., G. Cecchetti, and P. Teofilatto. 2015c. “Variable-time-domain neighboring optimal guidance. Part 2: Application to lunar descent and soft landing.” J. Opt. Theory Appl. 166 (1): 93–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-014-0675-7.
Pontani, M., and F. Celani. 2018. “Neighboring optimal guidance and attitude control for lunar ascent and orbit injection.” In Vol. 161 of Advances in the Astronautical Sciences. 373–392. Escondido, CA: Univelt.
Pontani, M., and B. A. Conway. 2010. “Particle swarm optimization applied to space trajectories.” J. Guid. Contr. Dyn. 33 (5): 1429–1441. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.48475.
Pontani, M., and B. A. Conway. 2012. “Particle swarm optimization applied to impulsive orbital transfers.” Acta Astron. 74: 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2011.09.007.
Pontani, M., and B. A. Conway. 2013. “Optimal finite-thrust rendezvous trajectories found via particle swarm algorithm.” J. Spac. Rock. 50 (6): 1222–1234. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A32402.
Pontani, M., and B. A. Conway. 2014. “Optimal low-thrust orbital maneuvers via indirect swarming method.” J. Opt. Theory Appl. 162 (1): 272–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-013-0471-9.
Pontani, M., P. Ghosh, and B. A. Conway. 2012. “Particle swarm optimization of multiple-burn rendezvous trajectories.” J. Guid. Contr. Dyn. 35 (4): 1192–1207. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.55592.
Seywald, H. 1994. “Trajectory optimization based on differential inclusion.” J. Guid. Contr. Dyn. 17 (3): 480–487. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.21224.
Seywald, H., and E. M. Cliff. 1994. “Neighboring optimal control based feedback law for the advanced launch system.” J. Guid. Contr. Dyn. 17 (6): 1154–1162. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.21327.
Tewari, A. 2011. Advanced control of aircraft, spacecraft and rockets. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Tian, B., W. Fan, R. Su, and Q. Zong. 2015a. “Real-time trajectory and attitude coordination control for reusable launch vehicle in reentry phase.” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 62 (3): 1639–1650. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2014.2341553.
Tian, B., W. Fan, and Q. Zong. 2015b. “Integrated guidance and control for reusable launch vehicle in reentry phase.” Nonlinear Dyn. 80 (1–2): 397–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-014-1877-0.
Yan, H., F. Fahroo, and I. M. Ross. 2002. “Real-time computation of neighboring optimal control laws.” In Proc., AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conf. and Exhibit. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Yeh, F.-K. 2015. “Sliding-mode-based contour-following controller for guidance and autopilot systems of launch vehicles.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part G J. Aerosp. Eng. 227 (2), 285–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410011433975.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 31Issue 5September 2018

History

Received: Nov 4, 2017
Accepted: Apr 3, 2018
Published online: Jun 26, 2018
Published in print: Sep 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Nov 26, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Dept. of Astronautical, Electrical, and Energy Engineering, Sapienza Univ. of Rome, via Salaria 851, 00138 Rome, Italy (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3095-7391. Email: [email protected]
Fabio Celani
Assistant Professor, School of Aerospace Engineering, Sapienza Univ. of Rome, via Salaria 851, 00138 Rome, Italy.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share