Technical Papers
Jun 18, 2018

Numerical Simulation of Aerostatic Force Coefficients of Bridge Decks Using Continuous Torsional Motion Technique

Publication: Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 31, Issue 5

Abstract

A low-frequency continuous torsional motion technique (CTMT) is presented to efficiently extract the aerostatic force coefficients (AFCs) of bridge decks. In contrast to the conventional numerical simulations at a series of discrete angles of attack, the CTMT can conveniently obtain the continuous angle-varying AFCs. Thus, the numerical modeling labor efforts and computation time are significantly reduced. The CTMT accuracy is validated by calculating the AFCs of one flat plate and comparing it to the theoretical solutions. The AFCs of two representative deck cross sections (both streamlined and bluff) are numerically calculated and compared to those of testing results, by which the applicability and limitation of this newly developed method are examined. Due to its convenience in obtaining more ample information without losing accuracy compared to the traditional discrete technique, the CTMT is strongly recommended for future numerical simulations of AFCs of bridge decks.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The research is jointly supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (DUT17ZD228), National Program on Key Basic Research Project (973 Program, 2015CB057705), and National Science Foundation of China (51478087; 51678115), which are gratefully acknowledged.

References

Batina, J. T. 1990. “Unsteady Euler airfoil solutions using unstructured dynamic meshes.” AIAA J. 28 (8): 1381–1388. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.25229.
Boonyapinyo, V., Y. Lauhatanon, and P. Lukkunaprasit. 2006. “Nonlinear aerostatic stability analysis of suspension bridges.” Eng. Struct. 28 (5): 793–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.10.008.
Bruno, L., and S. Khris. 2003. “The validity of 2D numerical simulations of vortical structure around a bridge deck.” Math. Comput. Model. 37 (7–8): 795–828. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-7177(03)00087-6.
Brusiani, F., S. Miranda de, L. Patruno, F. Ubertini, and P. Vaona. 2013. “On the evaluation of bridge deck flutter derivatives using RANS turbulence models.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 119 (1): 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2013.05.002.
Chen, A. R. 2002. Research on wind tunnel testing of the sectional model of Sutong Bridge. [In Chinese.] Shanghai, China: State Key Laboratory for Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji Univ.
Diana, G., F. Resta, and D. Rocchi. 2008. “A new numerical approach to reproduce bridge aerodynamic non-linearities in time domain.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 96 (10–11): 1871–1884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2008.02.052.
Diana, G., Y. Yamasaki, A. Larsen, D. Rocchi, S. Giappino, T. Argentini, A. Pagani, M. Villani, C. Somaschini, and M. Portentoso. 2013. “Construction stages of the long span suspension Izmit Bay Bridge: Wind tunnel test assessment.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 123 (6): 300–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2013.09.006.
Fluent. 2005a. FLUENT 6.3 theory’s guide. Pittsburgh: ANSYS, Inc.
Fluent. 2005b. FLUENT 6.3 user’s guide. Pittsburgh: ANSYS, Inc.
Fransos, D., and L. Bruno. 2006. “Determination of the aeroelastic transfer functions for streamlined bodies by means of a Navier-Stokes solver.” Math. Comput. Model. 43 (5): 506–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2005.10.002.
Hassan, M., A. Gerber, and H. Omar. 2010. “Numerical estimation of fluid elastic instability in tube arrays.” J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 132 (4): 041307–041317. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4002112.
Huang, L., and H. L. Liao. 2011. “Identification of flutter derivatives of bridge deck under multi-frequency vibration.” Eng. Appl. Comput. Fluid Mech. 5 (1): 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2011.11015349.
Hui, M. C. H., Z. Y. Zhou, A. R. Chen, and H. F. Xiang. 2008. “The effect of Reynolds numbers on the steady state aerodynamic force coefficients of the Stonecutters bridge deck section.” Int. J. Wind Struct. 11 (3): 179–192. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2008.11.3.179.
Mannini, C., and G. Bartoli 2008. “Investigation on the dependence of bridge deck flutter derivatives on steady angle of attack.” In Proc., BBAA VI, Int. Colloquium on Bluff Bodies Aerodynamics & Applications. Milan, Italy: CIRIVE.
Mannini, C., A. Šoda, R. Voß, and G. Schewe. 2010. “Unsteady RANS simulations of flow around a bridge section.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 98 (12): 742–753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2010.06.010.
Menter, F. R. 1994. “Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications.” AIAA J. 32 (8): 1598–1605. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12149.
Nieto, F., A. Zasso, D. Rocchi, and S. Hernándes 2008. “CFD verification of aerodynamic devices performance for the Messina Strait Bridge.” In Proc., BBAA VI, Int. Colloquium on Bluff Bodies Aerodynamics & Applications, Milan, Italy: CIRIVE.
Sarwar, M. W., T. Ishihara, K. Shimada, Y. Yamasaki, and T. Ikeda. 2008. “Prediction of aerodynamic characteristics of a box girder section using the LES turbulence model.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 96 (10–11): 1895–1911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2008.02.015.
Schneider, G., and M. Raw. 1987. “Control volume finite-element method for heat transfer and fluid flow using colocated variables—1. Computational procedure.” Numer. Heat Transfer Part A Appl. 11 (4): 363–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407788708913560.
Taylor, I. J., and M. Vezza. 2009. “A numerical investigation into the aerodynamic characteristics and aeroelastic stability of a footbridge.” J. Fluid Struct. 25 (1): 155–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2008.05.001.
Vairo, G. 2003. “A numerical model for wind loads simulation on long-span bridges.” Simul. Modell. Pract. Theory 11 (5–6): 315–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1569-190X(03)00053-4.
Wang, B., Y. L. Xu, L. D. Zhu, S. Y. Cao, and Y.-L. Li. 2013. “Determination of aerodynamic forces on stationary/moving vehicle-bridge deck system under crosswinds using computational fluid dynamics.” Eng. Appl. Comput. Fluid Mech. 7 (3): 355–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2013.11015477.
Watanabe, S., and K. Fumoto. 2008. “Aerodynamic study of slotted box girder using computational fluid dynamics.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 96 (10–11): 1885–1894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2008.02.056.
Xu, F. Y., B. B. Li, C. S. Cai, and Z. Zhang. 2013. “Experimental investigations on aerostatic characteristics of bridge decks under various conditions.” J. Bridge Eng. 19 (7): 04014024. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000601.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 31Issue 5September 2018

History

Received: Aug 1, 2017
Accepted: Mar 15, 2018
Published online: Jun 18, 2018
Published in print: Sep 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Nov 18, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Xuyong Ying, Ph.D.
Engineer, Institute of Bridge Engineering, Dalian Univ. of Technology, Dalian 116024, China.
Professor, Institute of Bridge Engineering, Dalian Univ. of Technology, Dalian 116024, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Mingjie Zhang
Ph.D. Candidate, Institute of Bridge Engineering, Dalian Univ. of Technology, Dalian 116024, China.
Zhe Zhang
Professor, Institute of Bridge Engineering, Dalian Univ. of Technology, Dalian 116024, China.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share