Influence of Mass Matrix Models on Flutter Computations
Publication: Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 31, Issue 3
Abstract
For the computation of the dynamic properties and response of structures using the finite-element method (FEM), there are two main options for the mass matrix modeling: the lumped model and the consistent model. Both have their own advantages and drawbacks. This work focuses on the influence of mass matrix models on flutter computations of aircraft structures. Even nowadays, with high computational power resources at our disposal, a reduced and precise model for the flutter problem could be of great value given the large number of compilations required to solve it. In order to find the most suitable mass matrix to achieve this task, four different mass matrices have been considered in this work: consistent, lumped, and two optimal (proposed by the authors). Three different aircraft structures have been analyzed: a clean wing, a wing with a tip mass, and a wing with a large tip mass. For every case, the same conclusion was drawn: the result using the consistent mass matrix converges with significantly fewer elements than when using the lumped mass matrix. In addition, the proposed optimal mass matrices, which are a weighted linear combination of the lumped and consistent mass matrices, do not improve the results obtained by the consistent mass approach either computationally or in accuracy. These conclusions contradict the usual procedure followed for flutter computations within the industry, where the lumped mass model is widely spread.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies from the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
References
Butler, T. A. (1990). “Eigenvalue computations with the QUAD4 consistent-mass matrix.” COSMIC, 18th NASTRAN User’s Colloquium, Computer Software Management and Information Center, Univ. of Georgia, Athens, GA.
Deshpande, S. S., Rawat, S. R., Bandewar, N. P., and Soman, M. Y. (2016). “Consistent and lumped mass matrices in dynamics and their impact on finite element analysis results.” Int. J. Mech. Eng. Technol., 7(2), 135–147.
Felippa, C. A. (2006). “Construction of customized mass-stiffness pairs using templates.” J. Aerosp. Eng., 241–258.
Fried, I., and Chavez, M. (2004). “Superaccurate finite element eigenvalue computation.” J. Sound Vibr., 275(1–2), 415–422.
Fried, I., and Leong, K. (2005). “Superaccurate finite element eigenvalues via a Rayleigh quotient correction.” J. Sound Vibr., 288(1–2), 375–386.
Giesing, J. P., Kalman, T. P., and Rodden, W. P. (1971). “Subsonic unsteady aerodynamics for general configurations. Part I—Direct application for the nonplanar doublet-lattice method.”, Vol. 1, Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Air Force Systems Command, Wright-Patterson Airforce Base, OH.
Kelly, H. N. (1958). “Some effects of mass ratio on the transonic flutter characteristics of untampered 45° sweptback wings of aspect ratio 2 and 3.5.”, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Washington, DC.
Lin, T. R. (2012). “An analytical and experimental study of the vibration response of a clamped ribbed plate.” J. Sound Vibr., 331(4), 902–913.
MacNeal, R. H. (1978). “A simple quadrilateral shell element.” Comput. Struct., 8(2), 175–183.
MATLAB [Computer software]. Mathworks, Natick, MA.
Meirovitch, L. (2001). Fundamentals of vibrations, McGraw Hill, Singapore, 408.
NASTRAN [Computer software]. MSC Software Corporation, Newport Beach, CA.
Nelson, H. C., and Tomassoni, J. E. (1949). “Experimental investigation of the effects of sweepback on flutter of a uniform cantilever wing with a variable located concentrated mass.”, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Washington, DC.
Scanlan, R., and Rosenbaum, R. (1951). Introduction to the study of aircraft vibration and flutter, Macmillan Company, New York, 253.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 31 • Issue 3 • May 2018
Copyright
©2018 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 27, 2017
Accepted: Nov 7, 2017
Published online: Mar 9, 2018
Published in print: May 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Aug 9, 2018
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.