Comparison of Building Adaptation Projects and Design for Adaptability Strategies
Publication: Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 27, Issue 3
Abstract
The primary goal of this paper was to answer the question: Do empirical data from real-world projects align with Design for Adaptability (DfA) strategies reported in the literature? The data and analysis presented herein suggested that when DfA strategies are present in building design (intentionally or otherwise), they indeed facilitate adaptation. Similarly, when the strategies were not present, the adaptation project was impeded. DfA strategies can contribute to circular economy by designing today’s buildings with the potential to be modified for future needs. Thus, DfA embraces the inevitability of change and allows buildings to be revitalized according to society’s evolving needs and wants. While previous journal papers, books, and design guides on this topic were based on theoretical reasoning, expert opinion surveys, practical experience, and case studies, the current paper contributed to the discussion by comparing DfA strategies from the literature with empirical data from 89 real-world building adaptations. Data were provided by 76 industry professionals and included short descriptions of the buildings’ physical features that facilitated or impeded the adaptation projects. A thematic analysis method was used to evaluate the data. Finally, the research provided practical steps for implementing adaptable design: quality documentation, open floor plans, large floor-to-floor heights, and simple designs.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This material is based on the work supported by the National Science Foundation under CAREER Grant No. 1553565. The authors also acknowledge and thank Makenzie Wilson and Delaney MacFarland for their assistance in data collection and processing. Contributions of the professionals who provided project data are also gratefully acknowledged.
References
Adams, K. T., M. Osmani, T. Thorpe, and J. Thornback. 2017. “Circular economy in construction: Current awareness, challenges and enablers.” In Vol. 170 of Proc., of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Waste and Resource Management, 15–24. London: Thomas Telford.
Allahaim, F., A. Alfaris, and D. Leifer. 2010. “Towards changeability: The adaptable buildings design (ABD) framework.” In Proc., 5th Int. Conf. of Arab Society for Computer Aided Architectural Design, 189–200. Fes, Morrocco: ASCAAD.
Baker, H., A. Moncaster, and A. Al-Tabbaa. 2017. “Decision-making for the demolition or adaptation of buildings.” In Proc., Institution of Civil Engineers-Forensic Engineering, 1–13.
Becker, A. K., B. E. Ross, and D. Albright. 2020. “Evaluating the weighted-sum approach for measuring buildings' adaptability.” J. Green Build. 15 (3): 37–54. https://doi.org/10.3992/jgb.15.3.37.
Bilal, M., K. I. A. Khan, M. J. Thaheem, and A. R. Nasir. 2020. “Current state and barriers to the circular economy in the building sector: Towards a mitigation framework.” J. Cleaner Prod. 276: 123250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123250.
Black, A. K., B. E. Ross, and Z. R. Rockow. 2018. “Identifying physical features that facilitate and impede building adaptation.” In Int. Conf. on Sustainability in Energy and Buildings, 52–62. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Brand, S. 1994. How buildings learn: What happens after they’re built. New York: Viking.
Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using thematic analysis in psychology.” Qual. Res. Psychol. 3 (2): 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Bullen, P. A., and P. E. D. Love. 2010. “The rhetoric of adaptive reuse or reality of demolition: Views from the field.” Cities 27: 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2009.12.005.
Conejos, S., C. Langston, and J. Smith. 2013. “AdaptSTAR model: A climate-friendly strategy to promote built environment sustainability.” Habitat Int. 37: 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.12.003.
Conejos, S., C. Langston, and J. Smith. 2014. “Designing for better building adaptability: A comparison of adaptSTAR and ARP models.” Habitat Int. 41: 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.07.002.
Cowee, N. P., and P. Schwehr. 2012. The typology of adaptability in building construction. Zürich, Switzerland: vdf Hochschulverlag AG.
Duffy, F. 1990. “Measuring building performance.” Facilities 8 (5): 17–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000002112.
Foster, G. 2020. “Circular economy strategies for adaptive reuse of cultural heritage buildings to reduce environmental impacts.” Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 152: 104507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104507.
Geissdoerfer, M., P. Savaget, N. M. P. Bocken, and E. J. Hultink. 2017. “The circular economy—A new sustainability paradigm?” J. Cleaner Prod. 143: 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048.
Gosling, J., P. Sassi, M. Naim, and R. Lark. 2013. “Adaptable buildings: A systems approach.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 7: 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2012.11.002.
Habraken, N. J. 1961. De dragers en de mensen, het einde van de massawoningbouw. Amsterdam: Scheltema & Holkema.
Hart, J., K. Adams, J. Giesekam, D. D. Tingley, and F. Pomponi. 2019. “Barriers and drivers in a circular economy: The case of the built environment.” Procedia CIRP 80: 619–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.12.015.
Heidrich, O., J. Kamara, S. Maltese, F. Re Cecconi, and M. C. Dejaco. 2017. “A critical review of the developments in building adaptability.” Int. J. Build. Pathol. Adapt. 35 (4): 284–303.
Herthogs, P., W. Debacker, B. Tunçer, Y. De Weerdt, and N. De Temmerman. 2019. “Quantifying the generality and adaptability of building layouts using weighted graphs: The SAGA method.” Buildings 9 (4): 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings9040092.
Hossain, M. U., and S. T. Ng. 2018. “Critical consideration of buildings’ environmental impact assessment towards adoption of circular economy: An analytical review.” J. Cleaner Prod. 205: 763–780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.120.
Huerta, M. V., J. London, A. Trowbridge, M. A. Avalos, W. Huang, and A. McKenna. 2017. “Cultivating the entrepreneurial mindset through design: Insights from thematic analysis of first-year engineering students’ reflections.” In Proc., ASEE Annual Conf. and Exposition. Columbus, OH: ASEE.
Israelsson, N., and B. Hansson. 2009. “Factors influencing flexibility in buildings.” Struct. Surv. 27 (2): 138–147.
Kanters, J. 2020. “Circular building design: An analysis of barriers and drivers for a circular building sector.” Buildings 10 (4): 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10040077.
Kendall, S. H., and J. Teicher. 2010. Residential open building. London: Spon Press.
Keymer, M. A. 2000. “Design strategies for new and renovation construction that increase the capacity of buildings to accommodate change.” Thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/9146.
Leising, E., J. Quist, and N. Bocken. 2018. “Circular economy in the building sector: Three cases and a collaboration tool.” J. Cleaner Prod. 176: 976–989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.010.
Mendoza, J. M. F., A. Gallego-Schmid, and A. Azapagic. 2019. “Building a business case for implementation of a circular economy in higher education institutions.” J. Cleaner Prod. 220: 553–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.045.
Minunno, R., T. O’Grady, G. M. Morrison, R. L. Gruner, and M. Colling. 2018. “Strategies for applying the circular economy to prefabricated buildings.” Buildings 8 (9): 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings8090125.
Morgan, C., and F. Stevenson. 2005. Design and detailing for deconstruction. Northumberland, UK: Scottish Ecological Design Association.
Mouilek, S., and M. Sabrina. 2009. “Design for adaptability and deconstruction (DfAD).” Thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/53070.
O’Connor, J. 2004. “Survey on actual service lives for North American buildings.” In Proc., Woodframe Housing Durability and Disaster Issues Conf., 1–9. Las Vegas: Forest Products Society.
Rockow, Z. R. 2020. “Qualitative & quantitative analyses of existing buildings’ adaptability.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Clemson Univ. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations/2670/.
Rockow, Z. R., B. Ross, and A. K. Black. 2018. “Review of methods for evaluating adaptability of buildings.” Int. J. Build. Pathol. Adapt. 37(3): 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-01-2018-0013.
Ross, B. E. 2017. “The learning buildings framework for quantifying building adaptability.” In ASCE Architectural Engineering Institute Conf., edited by J. S. Volz, 1067–1077. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Ross, B. E., D. A. Chen, S. Conejos, and A. Khademi. 2016. “Enabling adaptable buildings: Results of a preliminary expert survey.” Procedia Eng. 145 (Supplement C): 420–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.04.009.
Ross, B. E., Z. R. Rockow, and A. K. Becker. 2020. “Survey on Building Adaptation Data.” Distributed by Learning Buildings Research Group. https://www.learningbuildings.com/databases.html.
Schmidt III, R., and S. Austin. 2016. Adaptable architecture: Theory and practice. London: Routledge.
SEI (Structural Engineering Institute). 2010. Sustainability guidelines for the structural engineer. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Sepasgozar, S. M. E., S. R. Davis, H. Li, and X. Luo. 2018. “Modeling the implementation process for new construction technologies: Thematic analysis based on Australian and U.S. practices.” J. Manage. Eng. 34 (3): 05018005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000608.
Shipley, R., S. Utz, and M. Parsons. 2006. “Does adaptive reuse pay? A study of the business of building renovation in Ontario, Canada.” Int. J. Heritage Stud. 12 (6): 505–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527250600940181.
Slaughter, E. S. 2001. “Design strategies to increase building flexibility.” Build. Res. Inf. 29 (3): 208–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210010027693.
Solid 1&2. 2020. “The council on open building.” Accessed June 15, 2020. https://councilonopenbuilding.org/new-page.
Wilkinson, S. J., K. James, and R. Reed. 2009. “Using building adaptation to deliver sustainability in Australia.” Struct. Surv. 27(1): 46–61.
Wilkinson, S. J., and R. Reed. 2011. “Examining and quantifying the drivers behind alterations and extensions to commercial buildings in a central business district.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 29 (7): 725–735. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2011.588954.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 27 • Issue 3 • September 2021
Copyright
© 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 17, 2020
Accepted: Apr 19, 2021
Published online: Jun 7, 2021
Published in print: Sep 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Nov 7, 2021
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Jennifer Brigante, Brandon E. Ross, Mikayla Bladow, Costs of Implementing Design for Adaptability Strategies in Wood-Framed Multifamily Housing, Journal of Architectural Engineering, 10.1061/JAEIED.AEENG-1357, 29, 1, (2023).
- Rand Askar, Luís Bragança, Helena Gervásio, Design for Adaptability (DfA)—Frameworks and Assessment Models for Enhanced Circularity in Buildings, Applied System Innovation, 10.3390/asi5010024, 5, 1, (24), (2022).
- Charles Gillott, Buick Davison, Danielle Densley Tingley, Drivers, barriers and enablers: construction sector views on vertical extensions, Building Research & Information, 10.1080/09613218.2022.2087173, 50, 8, (909-923), (2022).
- Daniel J. Weeks, Fernanda Leite, Ranking Critical Factors for Facility Renovation and System Upgrade Decisions in Dormitories: A Delphi Study, Journal of Architectural Engineering, 10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000561, 28, 4, (2022).
- Delaney McFarland, Brandon Ross, M. Z. Naser, Rijk Blok, Patrick Teuffel, Quantitative evaluation of the relationship between physical parameters and building demolition or adaptation outcomes, Architecture, Structures and Construction, 10.1007/s44150-021-00014-9, (2021).