Case Studies
Jul 21, 2021

User Participation in Social Housing Practices in Turkey

Publication: Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 27, Issue 4

Abstract

Turkey, which is a country with rapid population growth, has a housing problem with low-income groups, that particularly emerged due to urbanization. Different solutions have been used in an attempt to solve this problem, within the scope of social housing policies that the local or central governments have produced. However, social housing policies have been insufficient to solve the rapidly changing housing problem due to the social, political, and economic dynamics of Turkey. Some social housing policies have succeeded; however, some have accelerated the formation of illegal settlements. Although the most important component of this multidimensional process is generally the government, actors, such as users, architects, and construction companies, whose expectations and effects are different from each other are the components of the process. It is uncommon for the user to have a say in the design, or production, or both of a house. This is true for Turkey and many countries worldwide. This paper aims to achieve a centralized view of the production of housing for low-income groups in Turkey, which is quite complicated and problematic; and to draw attention to the potential of user participation that has not previously had a place in this process and to open the issue to discussion. First, a literature review will be conducted that focuses on discourses in the late 1960s and early 1970s, where user participation in low-cost housing production was on the agenda. Later, to revise the existing large framework in the context of Turkey, social housing policies that were developed by the governments to solve the housing demands of low-income groups will be briefly reviewed. Finally, the effect of user participation in the process of social housing for low-income groups in Turkey will be discussed through the best practices believed to be from three practical experiments. The aim is to raise awareness about user participation in low-cost housing production in Turkey which is not currently on the agenda.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Aravena, A. 2014. “My architectural philosophy? Bring the community into the process.” TED Talks. Accessed May 18, 2019. https://www.ted.com/talks/alejandro_aravena_my_architectural_philosophy_bring_the_community_into_the_process?language=tr.
Atabaş, K., and K. Goymen. 1983. A local management story [Bir Yerel Yönetim Öyküsü], 1977–80 Ankara Belediyesi Deneyimi. Ankara, Turkey: Özgün Matbaacılık.
Baia, J. 2014. “Saal—Architecture in times of hope.” Homeland 2. Edition, s.18.
Bandeirinha, J. A. 2014. “SAAL 1974–2014: For an architecture.” In The SAAL process, edited by D. Sardo, J. A. Bandeirinha, and M. Burmester, 43–63. Porto, Portugal: Fundaçao de Serralves.
Beardsley, J. 2007. “A billion slum dwellers and counting.” Harvard Design Magazine, no. 27.
Bölen, F. 2004. “Housing policy and housing systems in Turkey.” ITU AIZ 1 (1): 14–31.
Bosma, K., D. Hoogstraten, and M. Vos. 2000. Housing for the millions: John Habraken and the SAR (1960–2000). Rotterdam, Netherlands: NAI.
Çakır, S. 2011. “Türkiye’de Göç, Kentleşme/Gecekondu Sorunu ve Üretilen Politikalar.” Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 23: 209–222. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/sufesosbil/issue/11414/136330.
Düzce Evsizler Kooperatifi. 2017. Accessed May 25, 2019. http://www.duzceevsizlerkooperatifi.org/.
Düzce Umut Atolyesi. 2017. “Fight together design together [Birlikte Mücadele Birlikte Tasarım].” Accessed May 18, 2019. https://duzceumutatolyesi.wordpress.com.
Elemental. n.d. “Elemental open source archive.” Accessed July 15, 2019. http://www.elementalchile.cl/en/.
Es, M., and T. Oral. 2014. “A study on housing development administration (TOKİ) application: Kocaeli Gölcük District [Toplu Konut idaresi Uygulaması Üzerine Bir İnceleme: Kocaeli Gölcük İlçesi].” Emek ve Toplum Dergisi 3 (6): 90–109.
Ettouney, S. M., and N. Abdel-Kader. 2003. “Users participation in low-cost housing projects post occupancy evaluation.” In XXXI IAHS 31 World Congress on Housing Housing Process & Product, 333–343. Porto, Portugal: Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto.
Fab City. n.d. “Fab City Whitepaper, locally productive, globally connected self-sufficient cities.” Accessed July 10, 2020. https://fab.city/uploads/whitepaper.pdf.
Freitas, F. G., E. N. Camargo, and A. L. Magnabosco. 2015. “Welfare gains in the Brazilian social housing program.” The Brazilian Housing Policy Ministério das Cidades. Brussels, Belgium: Cities Alliance.
Gattoni, G. 2009. A case for the incremental housing process in sites-and-services programs and comments on a new initiative in Guyana, 7–18. Washington, DC: InterAmerican Development Bank.
Goethert, R. 2010. “Incremental housing: A proactive urban strategy.” Monday Developments magazine, 23–25, September 2010. https://sigus-r1.mit.edu/news/incremental-housing-article-monday-magazine.
Habraken, J. N. 1972. Supports: An alternative to mass housing. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers, Michigan Univ.
Habraken, J. N. 1985. “Who is participating? Towards a professional role.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., Int. Design Participation Conf. Eindhoven, Netherlands: Design Coalition Team, TU/e.
Habraken, J. N. 2008. “Design for flexibility.” Build. Res. Inf. 36 (3): 290–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210801995882.
Hamdi, N. 1991. Housing without houses, participation, flexibility, enablement. Devon, UK: SRP.
Harris, R. 2003a. “A double irony: The originality and influence of John F.C. Turner.” Habitat Int. 27 (2): 245–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-3975(02)00048-6.
Harris, R. 2003b. “Learning from the past: International housing policy since 1945—An introduction.” Habitat Int. 27 (2): 163–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-3975(02)00043-7.
ICG (International Crisis Group). 2019. Accessed April 12, 2019. https://www.crisisgroup.org/latest-updates/report.
İnceoğlu, A., and İ Yurekli. 2011. “Mixité': An urban and housing issue.” In Proc., 23rd. ENHR Conf., edited by C. Thouzelier and M. C. Jaillet. s.n.
ITU-HREC (Housing Research and Education Center). n.d. Accessed March 5, 2019. http://www.kaem.itu.edu.tr/anasayfa.
Kara, M. 2012. “The role of the gecekondu transformation project in the solution of the housing problems: The case of Ankara Gultepe and Yatıkmusluk suburbs.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Social Sciences Institute, Süleyman Demirel Univ.
Karasu, M. A. 2005. “A different approach in solving the housing problem in Turkey; municipal-collective housing administration and housing cooperatives collaboration model” [Türkiye’de Konut Sorununun Çözümünde Farklı Bir Yaklaşım; Belediye-Toplu Konut İdaresi-Konut Kooperatifleri İşbirliği Modeli]. Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi 1: 56–87.
Lee, Y. 2008. “Design participation tactics: The challenges and new roles for designers in the co-design process.” Co-Design 4 (1): 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875613.
Lloyd, P. 2017. “From design methods to future-focused thinking: 50 years of design research.” Des. Stud. 48: A1–A8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.12.004.
Moshaver, S., and H. Altan. 2016. “A knowledge model to implement home working in multi-tenant housing.” In Proc., 19th Int. Conf., CIB W104 Open Building Implementation. Durban, South Africa: International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction.
Nagore Setien, I. 2014. “Towards an open and user driven housing architecture: Layers principle, infrastructure types and technical devices.” In Congreso Internacional de Vivienda Colectiva Sostenible, 96–101. Barcelona: Máster Laboratorio de la Vivienda Sostenible del Siglo XXI. http://hdl.handle.net/2099/14882.
Pamir, H. 1988. “Bati-Kent New Town.” In Mimar 28: Architecture in Development, edited by H.-U. Khan, 42–53. Singapore: Concept Media Ltd.
Pulat, G. 1992. “The housing problems of low-income people and the search for spatial solution with social content” [Dar Gelirli Kentlilerin Konut Sorunu ve Soruna Sosyal İçerikli Mekansal Çözüm Arayışları]. Ph.D. thesis, Architecture Dept., İstanbul Technical Univ.
Sağlamer, G., H. Turgut, M. Aksoy, and P. Dursun. 1997. “Continuity and change in squatter dwellings.” Open House Int. 22 (3): 37–42.
Sağlamer, G., H. Turgut, M. Aksoy, N. Paker, A. İnceoğlu, and P. Dursun. 1995a. “Housing for low-income groups.” In Avrupa Birliği MED-CAMPUS Housing Network Programı çerçevesinde Eğitim ve Araştırma Projesi. Uluslararası Proje Ortakları: ITU, Newcastle University- Newcastle Upon Tyne-CARDO, Queen’s Univ. of Belfast, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Univ. College of Dublin.
Sağlamer, G., H. Yürekli, M. Aksoy, N. Paker, A. İnceoğlu, and N. Wilkonson. 1995b. Dar Gelirlilerin Konut Probleminin Çözümünde Mevcut Yaklaşımların Karşılaştırmalı Analizi ve Çözüm Önerileri. TÜBİTAK Araştırma Projesi İNTAG-104.
Sanoff, H. 2000. Community participation methods in design and planning. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Sayın, E. R. 1983. A local management story [Bir Yerel Yönetim Öyküsü], edited by K. Göymen, 1977-80 Ankara Belediyesi Deneyimi, Özgün Matbaacılık, Ankara.
SBB (Strateji ve Bütçe Başkanliği). n.d. “Presidency of the Republic of Turkey, Strategy and Budget Office” [T.C. Cumhurbaşkanlığı Strateji ve Bütçe Başkanlığı]. Accessed June 10, 2019. http://www.sbb.gov.tr/.
Schnabel, M. A., T. T. Lo, and Y. Gao. 2015. “Modrule: A user-centric mass housing design platform, computer-aided architectural design futures.” In Proc., 16th Int. Conf., Computer-Aided Architectural Design Futures. The Next City - New Technologies and the Future of the Built Environment. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
Sealy, P. 2016. “Review: The SAAL process: Housing in Portugal 1974–76.” J. Soc. of Archit. Historians 75 (1): 120–121. https://doi.org/10.1525/jsah.2016.75.1.120.
Solhan, E., and R. Kafescioğlu. 2013. “Past, present and future of soil structures.” In Proc., 2nd National Mudbrick Symposium [Toprak Yapıların Dünü, Bugünü ve Yarını, İkinci Ulusal Kerpiç Sempozyumu]. Konya, Turkey: Chamber of Architects of Turkey.
Studio X. 2016. “Hope (Umut) Exhibition.” Accessed June 25, 2020. https://www.studio-x.org/tr/events/umut-1999-2016.
Tapan, M. 1996. “Public housing and development in Turkey.” In Housing and settlement in Anatolia: A historical perspective, edited by Y. Sey, 366–378. İstanbul, Turkey: Türkiye Ekonomik ve Toplumsal Tarih Vakfı.
TDK (Türk Dil Kurumu). n.d. “Social Housing (Sosyal Konut).” Accessed May 18, 2019. https://www.tdk.gov.tr.
Tekeli, İ. 1982. “Urbanization writings in Turkey” [Türkiye’de Kentleşme Yazıları]. Turhan Kitabevi.
Till, J. 2005. “The negotiation of hope.” Accessed September 17, 2016. https://jeremytill.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/post/attachment/19/2005_The_Negotiation_of_Hope.pdf.
TOKİ. n.d.-a. “Establishment and History” [Kurulus ve Tarihçe]. Accessed May 17, 2019. https://www.toki.gov.tr/kurulus-ve-tarihce.
TOKİ. n.d.-b. “Uygulama/İllere Göre Uygulamalar.” Accessed June 10, 2019. https://www.toki.gov.tr/uygulama/illere-gore-uygulamalar.
TUIK (Türk İstatistik Kurumu). 2016. “Haber Bulteni.”Accessed May 16, 2020. http://www.turkstat.gov.tr.
Turgut, H., M. Aksoy, N. Paker, P. Dursun, A. İnceoğlu, and G. Sağlamer. 1996. “Home and street: Relations of home-street in squatter settlements and urbanization.” Int. J. Hous. Sci. Appl. 20 (4): 289–297.
Turner, J. 1989. “Barriers, channels and community control.” In The living city, edited by D. Cadman and G. Payne. London: Routledge.
Tuzla Emlak Konutları. n.d. Accessed May 18, 2019. http://tuzlaemlakkonutlari1.com.
Umut Evleri. 2018a. Accessed February 23, 2021. http://www.umutevleri.org/.
Umut Evleri. 2018b. “Kalıpların dışında bir mimarlık pratiği: Düzce Umut Atölyesi.” Umut Evleri. Accessed January 10, 2017. http://www.umutevleri.org/kaliplarin-disinda-bir-mimarlik-pratigi-duzce-umut-atolyesi/.
Van Ballegooijen, J., and R. Rocco. 2013. “The ideologies of informality: Informal urbanisation in the architectural and planning discourses.” Third World Q. 34 (10): 1794–1810. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2013.851890.
Yurekli, H., and Y. Alkışer. 2004. “Past, present and future of state housing in Turkey” [Türkiye’de Devlet Konutu’nun dünü, bugünü, yarını]. İtü Dergisi/A Mimarlık, Planlama, Tasarım 3 (1): 63–74.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Architectural Engineering
Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 27Issue 4December 2021

History

Received: Oct 30, 2018
Accepted: Jan 28, 2021
Published online: Jul 21, 2021
Published in print: Dec 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Dec 21, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Gülcan Ay Özen [email protected]
Architect, Istanbul, Turkey (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Meltem Aksoy [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, Istanbul Technical Univ., Taşkışla Campus 34437, Istanbul, Turkey. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share