Technical Papers
Mar 10, 2021

Development of a Contractor Failure Prediction Model Using Analytic Network Process

Publication: Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 27, Issue 2

Abstract

Construction contractor failure is one of the most critical and costly risks for a employer. Despite the ability of the employer to terminate the construction contract due to the contractor's failure to achieve crucial contractual objectives, the employer still suffers adverse impacts on time, cost, and goodwill. Under price-driven selection, construction contracts are usually awarded to the lowest bidder, with little attention to a bidder's capabilities. Therefore, this study attempted to develop a model to assist construction professionals in selecting the bidder with the lowest failure potential. The analytic network process (ANP) was used to analyze the data collected from a prepared fuzzy questionnaire. The results concluded a ranking for the reasons of contractor failure, which were initially identified from the literature and categorized into five categories. The results showed that “corporate governance” and “financial position” are the first and second most influential categories indicating contractor failure potential, respectively. Furthermore, “cost control,” “tender approach,” and “technical competency” are ranked as the third, fourth, and least influential categories, respectively. Construction practitioners can utilize the model developed by this study to evaluate bidders to minimize the probability of contractor failure and, consequently, to maximize the probability of successful project delivery.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Afsath, K., and L. Sebastian. 2015. “Fuzzy MATLAB approach to construction contractor selection.” Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res. 4 (8): 45–49.
Agroudy, M. E., E. Elbeltagi, and M. E. A. E. Razek. 2009. “A fuzzy logic approach for contractor selection.” In Proc., 5th Int. Conf. on Construction in the 21st Century, 1–8. Miami, FL: CITC-V.
Al-Sobiei, O. S., D. Arditi, and G. Polat. 2005. “Managing owner’s risk of contractor default.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 131 (9): 973–978. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:9(973).
Angeles Gil, M., M. Asuncion Lubiano, S. de La Rosa de Saa, and B. Sinova. 2015. “Analyzing data from a fuzzy rating scale-based questionnaire. A case study.” Psicothema 27 (2): 182–191.
Bendana, R., A. del Cano, and M. Pilar de la Cruz. 2008. “Contractor selection: Fuzzy-control approach.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 35 (5): 473–486. https://doi.org/10.1139/L07-127.
Bouchon, B. 1981. “Fuzzy questionnaires.” Fuzzy Sets Syst. 6 (1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(81)90076-2.
Chava, S., and R. A. Jarrow. 2004. “Bankruptcy prediction with industry effects.” Rev. Finance 8 (4): 537–569. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/8.4.537.
De Loach, J. W. 2000. Enterprise-wide risk management: Strategies for linking risk and opportunity. London: Prentice Hall.
Denicol, J., R. A. Cassel, and S. D. Pryke. 2016. “Competitive dimensions for supplier selection in the construction industry.” In Construction, Building and Real Estate Research Conf. 2016. London, UK: Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors.
El Chanati, H., M. S. El-Abbasy, F. Mosleh, A. Senouci, M. Abouhamad, I. Gkountis, T. Zayed, and H. Al-Derham 2016. “Multi-criteria decision making models for water pipelines.” J. Perform. Constr. Facilities. 30 (4): 4015090.
Guajardo, A. B. R., M. J. G. López, and I. G. Ruiz. 2015. “Analysis of the reliability of the fuzzy scale for assessing the students” learning styles in mathematics.” In Proc., 16th World Congress of the Int. Fuzzy Systems Association and 9th Conf. of the European Society for Fuzzy Logic and Technology, 727–733. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Atlantis Press.
Jang, Y., I. B. Jeong, and Y. K. Cho. 2020. “Business failure prediction of construction contractors using a LSTM RNN with accounting, construction market, and macroeconomic variables.” J. Manage. Eng. 36 (2): 04019039. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000733.
Jang, Y., I. B. Jeong, Y. K. Cho, and Y. Ahn. 2019. “Predicting business failure of construction contractors using long short-term memory recurrent neural network.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 145 (11): 04019067. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001709.
Kahraman, C., U. Cebeci, and D. Ruan. 2004. “Multi-attribute comparison of catering service companies using fuzzy AHP: The case of Turkey.” Int. J. Prod. Econ. 87 (2): 171–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(03)00099-9.
Lee, J. I., H. S. Lee, and M. Park. 2018. “Contractor liquidity evaluation model for successful public housing projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 144 (12): 04018109. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001569.
Mamdani, E. H. 1974. “Application of fuzzy algorithms for control of simple dynamic plant.” Proc. Inst. Electr. Eng. 121 (12): 1585–1588. https://doi.org/10.1049/piee.1974.0328.
Mosleh, F., T. Zayed, and M. S. El-Abbasy. 2016. “Evidential reasoning—based condition assessment model for offshore gas pipelines.” J. Perfor. Constr. Facil. 30 (6): 4016037.
RICS (Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors). 2016. RICS guidance note, global. 1st ed. London: RICS.
Russell, J. S. 1991. “Contractor failure: Analysis.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil 5 (3): 163–180. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(1991)5:3(163).
Russell, J. S. 1996. Constructor prequalification: Choosing the best constructor and avoiding constructor failure. New York: ASCE.
Russell, J. S., and M. J. Skibniewski. 1988. “Decision criteria in contractor prequalification.” J. Manage. Eng. 4 (2): 148–164. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)9742-597X(1988)4:2(148).
Russell, J. S., and M. J. Skibniewski. 1990. “QUALIFIER-1: Contractor prequalification model.” J. Comput. Civil Eng. 4 (1): 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(1990)4:1(77).
Saaty, T. L. 1980. The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Saaty, T. L. 1996. Decision making with dependence and feedback : The analytic network process : The organization and prioritization of complexity. 1st ed. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.
Saaty, T. L. 2005. Theory and applications of the analytic network process: Decision making with benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.
Schwartzkopf, W., and R. Tasker. 2005. Practical guide to construction contract surety claims. 2nd ed. New York: Aspen Publishers.
Severson, G. D., J. S. Russell, and E. J. Jaselskis. 1994. “Predicting contract surety bond claims using contractor financial data.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 120 (2): 405–420. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1994)120:2(405).
Sobel, K. 1984. “Owner delay damages chargeable to performance bond surety.” Calif. West. Law Rev. 21 (1): 128–148.
Tang, S. L., I. U. Ahmad, S. M. Ahmed, and M. Lu. 2004. Quantitative techniques for decision making in construction. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Tserng, H. P., G. F. Lin, L. K. Tsai, and P. C. Chen. 2011. “An enforced support vector machine model for construction contractor default prediction.” Autom. Constr. 20 (8): 1242–1249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2011.05.007.
Zadeh, L. A. 1965. “Fuzzy sets.” Inf. Control 8 (3): 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X.
Zadeh, L. A. 1975. “The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning—I.” Inf. Sci. 8 (3): 199–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0255(75)90036-5.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Architectural Engineering
Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 27Issue 2June 2021

History

Received: Feb 2, 2019
Accepted: Nov 23, 2020
Published online: Mar 10, 2021
Published in print: Jun 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Aug 10, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Yip Kwong Tsang [email protected]
Former M.Sc. Student, Building and Real Estate Dept., Hong Kong Polytechnic Univ., Hong Kong (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Sherif Abdelmageed [email protected]
Research Assistant, Building and Real Estate Dept., Hong Kong Polytechnic Univ., Hong Kong. Email: [email protected]
Tarek Zayed, F.ASCE [email protected]
P.E., P.Eng.
Professor, Building and Real Estate Dept., Hong Kong Polytechnic Univ., Hong Kong. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share