Technical Papers
Feb 26, 2019

One-Sided Steel Shear Connections in Progressive Collapse Scenario

Publication: Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 25, Issue 2

Abstract

There are many design techniques and philosophies intended to provide structural integrity or increase structural robustness, thereby making structures resistant to progressive collapse. However, studies that reveal origins and levels of inherent robustness in structural steel members and systems are limited. The present study sought to lay a foundation for the process of behavior evaluation of components and assemblages initially designed for purposes other than progressive collapse, such as gravity loads, and make recommendations regarding their performance and possible methods for improvements for the new scenario. These recommendations can lead to more economical design and safer structural steel systems in the event of localized damage that has the potential to spread to a disproportionately large part of the structure. Connections play a major role in ensuring general integrity of different types of steel structural systems. Hence, numerical investigations were performed to extend the current body of knowledge on connections and, consequently, the structural response in the event of progressive collapse. This study was intended to examine the response of steel frames with simple shear connections in the aftermath of unusual and extreme localized loads. The main goal of this research was to evaluate the behavior of some prevalent and economical one-sided (i.e., connected only on one side of the supported beam web) shear connection types—shear tab, tee (WT), and single angle—in buildings and perform numerical analyses on those connection configurations under extreme loading scenarios represented generically by the so-called column-removal scenario. Characteristic features of the connection response, such as the potential to develop a reliable alternative load path through catenary action and ultimate rotational capacities, are discussed to provide a solid foundation for assessing the performance of buildings with these types of connections. Observations regarding the analysis results were synthesized and conclusions were drawn with respect to the demands placed on the connections. The results of this research contribute to a better understanding of the resistance of steel structures with one-sided shear connections to progressive collapse.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada provided the funding for this study. The authors are thankful to Dr. Christopher Raebel from the Milwaukee School of Engineering and Christopher Foley from Marquette University, who generously provided data pertaining to their test results.

References

AISC. 2002. Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. ANSI/AISC 341. Chicago: AISC.
AISC. 2017. Manual of steel construction. 15th ed. Chicago: AISC.
ASCE. 2013. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings. ASCE/SEI 41-13. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASCE. 2016. Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures. ASCE/SEI 7-16. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Astaneh, A. 2005. “Design of shear tab connections for gravity and seismic loads.” Steel TIPS. Moraga, CA: Structural Steel Educational Council.
Astaneh, A. 2007. “Progressive collapse prevention of steel frames with shear connections.” Steel TIPS. Moraga, CA: Structural Steel Educational Council.
ASTM. 2008. Standard specification for carbon structural steel. A 36/A 36M-08. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2009. Standard specification for structural bolts, steel, heat treated 830 MPa minimum tensile strength (Metric). A 325M-09. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2010. Standard specification for high-strength steel bolts, classes 10.9 and 10.9.3, for structural steel joints (Metric). A490M-10. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2011. Standard specification for structural steel shapes. A992/A992M -11. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2014. General requirements for rolled or welded structural quality steel/Structural quality steel. G40.20-13/G40.21-13. Mississauga, ON, Canada: CSA.
Daneshvar, H., and R. G. Driver. 2010. “Application of seismic steel connection experiments to column removal scenario.” In Proc., 2nd Specialty Conf. on Disaster Mitigation. Montreal, QC, Canada: Canadian Society for Civil Engineering.
Daneshvar, H., and R. G. Driver. 2018. “Modelling benchmarks for steel shear connections in column removal scenario.” J. Build. Eng. 16: 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2017.12.013.
Daneshvar, H., S. A. Oosterhof, and R. G. Driver. 2012. “Compressive arching and tensile catenary action in steel shear connections under column removal scenario.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Structural Specialty Conf. Montreal, QC, Canada: Canadian Society for Civil Engineering.
Dassault Systèmes. 2009. Abaqus analysis user’s manual. Providence, RI: Simulia Corp.
DeStefano, J. 2006. “Detailing to prevent progressive collapse.” Structure Mag. 11: 66–67.
DoD (Department of Defense). 2009. Design of buildings to resist progressive collapse. UFC 4-023-03. Washington, DC: DoD.
FEMA. 2000. Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. FEMA 356. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Foley, C. M., K. Martin, and C. Schneeman. 2007. Robustness in structural steel framing systems. Rep. MU-CEEN-SE-07-01, final report submitted to American Institute of Steel Construction. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette Univ.
Friedman, A. D. 2009. “Axial, shear and moment interaction of WT connections.” M.Sc. thesis, Milwaukee School of Engineering.
Girhammar, U. A. 1980. Behaviour of bolted beam-to connections under catenary action in damaged steel structures. Lulea, Sweden: Swedish Council for Building Research.
GSA (General Services Administration). 2013. Progressive collapse analysis and design guidelines for new federal office buildings and major modernization projects. Washington, DC: GSA.
Guravich, S. J., and J. L. Dawe. 2006. “Simple beam connections in combined shear and tension.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 33 (4): 357–372. https://doi.org/10.1139/l05-057.
Johnson, M. 2009. “Axial, shear and moment interaction of single angle connections.” M.Sc. thesis, Milwaukee School of Engineering.
Kameshki, E., and M. Saka. 2003. “Genetic algorithm based optimum design of nonlinear planar steel frames with various semi-rigid connections.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 59 (1): 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(02)00021-4.
Lim, J., and T. Krauthammer. 2006. “Progressive collapse analyses of 2D steel-framed structures with different connection models.” Eng. J. Am. Inst. Steel Constr. 43: 201–215.
Marchand, K. 2008. “Guidance for progressive collapse analysis: Recommended performance levels for alternate path analysis of blast-damaged steel connections.” In Proc., Structures Congress/North American Steel Construction Conf. (NASCC). Red Hook, NY: Curran.
Marchand, K. A., and F. Alfawakhiri. 2004. Facts for steel buildings: Blast and progressive collapse. Chicago: American Institute of Steel Construction.
Murray, T. 2013. AISC night school: Fundamentals of connection design. Chicago: AISC.
Oosterhof, S. A., and R. G. Driver. 2015. “Behavior of steel shear connections under column-removal demands.” J. Struct. Eng. 141 (4): 04014126. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001073.
Powell, G. 2005. “Progressive collapse: Case studies using nonlinear analysis.” In Proc., 2005 Structures Congress and the 2005 Forensic Engineering Symp. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Thompson, S. L. 2009. “Axial, shear and moment interaction of single plate shear tab connections.” M.Sc. thesis, Milwaukee School of Engineering.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Architectural Engineering
Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 25Issue 2June 2019

History

Received: Jan 30, 2018
Accepted: Nov 1, 2018
Published online: Feb 26, 2019
Published in print: Jun 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Jul 26, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Hossein Daneshvar, Ph.D. [email protected]
P.E.
P.Eng.
Graduate Research Fellow, Faculty of Engineering, Civil and Environmental Engineering Dept., Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Robert G. Driver, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
P.Eng.
Professor, Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Civil and Environmental Engineering Dept., Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share