Case Studies
Jan 14, 2013

Design Process Communication Methodology: Improving the Effectiveness and Efficiency of Collaboration, Sharing, and Understanding

Publication: Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 20, Issue 1

Abstract

Designers struggle to (1) collaborate within projects, (2) share processes across projects, and (3) understand processes across the firm or industry. Overcoming each challenge requires communication of design processes. This paper aggregates concepts from organizational science, human-computer interaction, and process modeling fields to develop the design process communication methodology (DPCM). The DPCM consists of elements that represent and contextualize processes and methods that enable designers to capture and use the processes. These elements and methods enable a methodology that is computable, embedded, modular, personalized, scalable, shared, social, and transparent. The authors operationalize the DPCM via the process integration platform, a cloud-based process communication application where individuals exchange and organize files as nodes in information dependency maps. This paper provides evidence of the DPCM’s testability and proposes metrics for evaluating the DPCM’s effectiveness and efficiency in communicating design processes. The DPCM lays the foundation for commercial software that shifts focus away from incremental and fragmented process improvement toward a platform that nurtures emergence of (1) improved multidisciplinary collaboration, (2) process knowledge sharing, and (3) innovation-enabling understanding of existing processes.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the supporters of this research, including Arup and the Center for Integrated Facilities Engineering (CIFE) at Stanford University, California. Also, the validation of this research would not be possible without the development of PIP by software architect David Anderson and support by programmer, Zheren Zhang.

References

Akin, O. (2001). “Variants in design cognition.” Design knowing and learning: Cognition in design education, C. Eastman, M. McCracken, and W. Newstetter, eds., Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 105–124.
American Institute of Architects. (2007). Integrated project delivery—A working definition. McGraw Hill Construction, Sacramento, CA.
Austin, S., and Baldwin, A. (1996). “A data flow model to plan and manage the building design process.” J. Eng. Des., 7(1), 3–25.
Austin, S., Baldwin, A., Li, B., and Waskett, P. (1999). “Analytical design planning technique: A model of the detailed building design process.” Des. Stud., 20(3), 279–296.
Austin, S., Baldwin, A., Li, B., and Waskett, P. (2000). “Analytical design planning technique (ADePT): A dependency structure matrix tool to schedule the building design process.” Construct. Manag. Econ., 18(2), 173–182.
Baldwin, A. N., Austin, S. A., Hassan, T. M., and Thorpe, A. (1998). “Planning building design by simulating information flow.” Autom. Construct., 8(2), 149–163.
Ballard, G. (2000). “Positive vs negative iteration in design.” Proc., 8th Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction, Univ. of Sussex, Brighton, U.K., 17–19.
Ballard, G., and Koskela, L. (1998). “On the agenda of design management research.” Proc., 6th Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction, International Group for Lean Construction, Guaruj, Brazil.
Benkler, Y. (2002). “Coase’s penguin, or, Linux and the nature of the firm.” Yale Law J., 112(3), 369–446.
Berger, P. L., and Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality, Doubleday, New York.
Card, S. K., MacKinlay, J. D., and Shnieiderman, B. (1999). Readings in information visualization: Using vision to think, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco.
Carrillo, P., and Chinowsky, P. (2006). “Exploiting knowledge management: The engineering and construction perspective.” J. Manage. Eng., 2–10.
Chachere, J. M., and Haymaker, J. R. (2011). “Framework for measuring the rationale clarity of A/E/C design decisions.” J. Archit. Eng., 86–96.
Clarkson, J., and Eckert, C. (2005). Design process improvement: A review of current practice, Springer-Verlag, London.
Clevenger, C., and Haymaker, J. (2011). “Metrics to assess design guidance.” Des. Stud., 32(5), 431–456.
Coase, R. H. (1937). “The nature of the firm.” Economica, 4(16), 386–405.
Conklin, E. J., and Yakemovic, K. C. B. (1991). “A process-oriented approach to design rationale.” Hum. Comput. Interact., 6(3–4), 357–391.
Conklin, J. (1996). Designing organizational memory: Preserving intellectual assets in a knowledge economy, CogNexus Institute, Glebe Creek, MD.
Davis, S. M., and Lawrence, P. R. (1977). Matrix, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
Ding, L., Giess, M., Goh, Y. M., McMahon, C. A., and Thangarajah, U. (2009). “Component-based records: A novel method to record transaction design work.” Adv. Eng. Inform., 23(3), 332–347.
Dossick, C. S., and Neff, G. (2010). “Organizational divisions in BIM-enabled commercial construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 459–467.
Eckert, C. M., Clarkson, P. J., and Stacey, M. K. (2001). “Information flow in engineering companies—problems and their causes.” Proc., Int. Conf. on Engineering Design, Professional Engineering Publications, Suffolk, U.K., 43–50.
Eppinger, S. D. (1991). “Model-based approaches to managing concurrent engineering.” J. Eng. Des., 2(4), 283–290.
Fisher, N. (1990). “The use of structured data analysis as a construction management research tool: The technique.” Construct. Manag. Econ., 8(4), 341–362.
Flager, F., Welle, B., Bansal, P., Sorekmekun, G., and Haymaker, J. (2009). “Multidisciplinary process integration and design optimization of a classroom building.” J. Info. Tech. Const., 14, 595–612.
Ford, J. D., and Ford, L. W. (1995). “The role of conversations in producing intentional change in organizations.” Acad. Manage. Rev., 20(3), 541–570.
Froese, T., and Han, Z. (2009). “Project information management and complexity in the construction industry.” Proc., 26th Int. Conf. Managing IT in Construction, CIB W078, Istanbul, Turkey, 1–10.
Fuks, H., et al. (2008). “Inter- and intra-relationships between communication coordination and cooperation in the scope of the 3C collaboration model.” Proc., 12th Int. Conf. on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design, Pontifical Catholic Univ., Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 148–153.
Galbraith, J. R. (1977). Organization design, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
Gane, V., and Haymaker, J. (2010). “Benchmarking current conceptual high-rise design processes.” J. Archit. Eng., 100–111.
Garcia, A. C. B., Kunz, J., Ekstrom, M., and Kiviniemi, A. (2004). “Building a project ontology with extreme collaboration and virtual design and construction.” Adv. Eng. Inform., 18(2), 71–83.
Grant, R. M. (1996). “Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm.” Strateg. Manage. J., 17, 109–122.
Hansen, M. T., Nohria, N., and Tierney, T. (1999). “What’s your strategy for managing knowledge?” Harv. Bus. Rev., 77(2), 106–116.
Hargadon, A., and Sutton, R. I. (2000). “Building an innovation factory.” Harv. Bus. Rev., 78(3), 157–166.
Hartmann, T., Fischer, M., and Haymaker, J. (2009). “Implementing information systems with project teams using ethnographic-action research.” Adv. Eng. Inform., 23(1), 57–67.
Haymaker, J. (2006). “Communicating, integrating and improving multidisciplinary design narratives.” Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. on Des. Comp. and Cognition, Springer, Netherlands, 635–653.
Haymaker, J., Kunz, J., Suter, B., and Fischer, M. (2004). “Perspectors: Composable, reusable reasoning modules to construct an engineering view from other engineering views.” Adv. Eng. Inform., 18(1), 49–67.
Haymaker, J. R., Chachere, J. M., and Senescu, R. R. (2011). “Measuring and improving rationale clarity in a university office building design process.” J. Archit. Eng., 97–111.
Heer, J., Viegas, F. B., and Wattenberg, M. (2007). “Voyagers and voyeurs: Supporting asynchronous collaborative information visualization.” Comp. Human Interaction, Association for Computing Machinery, San Jose, CA.
Homer-Dixon, T.F. (2000). The ingenuity gap: Facing the economic, environmental, and other challenges of an increasingly complex and unpredictable world, Knopf, New York.
Ïpek, E., McKee, S., Caruana, R., de Supinski, B., and Schulz, M. (2006). “Efficiently exploring architectural design spaces via predictive modeling.” Proc., 12th Int. Conf. on Architecture Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 195–206.
Ishino, Y., and Jin, Y. (2002). “Estimate design intent: A multiple genetic programming and multivariate analysis based approach.” Adv. Eng. Inform., 16(2), 107–125.
Ishino, Y., and Jin, Y. (2006). “An information value based approach to design procedure capture.” Adv. Eng. Inform., 20(1), 89–107.
Javernick-Will, A., Levitt, R., and Scott, W. R. (2008). “Mobilizing knowledge for international projects.” Proc., 2008 ASCE LEED Conf., CIB Task Group 64 and ASCE Construction Research Council, Lake Tahoe, CA.
Javernick-Will, A., and Levitt, R. E. (2010). “Mobilizing institutional knowledge for international projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 430–441.
Jin, Y., and Levitt, R. E. (1996). “The virtual design team: A computational model of project organizations.” Comput. Math. Organ. Theory, 2(3), 171–195.
Kam, C., and Fischer, M. (2004). “Capitalizing on early project decision-making opportunities to improve facility design, construction, and life-cycle performance–POP, PM4D, and decision dashboard approaches.” Autom. Construct., 13(1), 53–65.
Khanna, T., Palepu, K. G., and Sinha, J. (2005). “Strategies that fit emerging markets.” Harv. Bus. Rev., 83(6), 63–76.
Kreiner, K. (2002). “Tacit knowledge management: The role of artifacts.” J. Knowl. Manage., 6(2), 112–123.
Lee, G., Sacks, R., and Eastman, C. (2007). “Product data modeling using GTPPM—A case study.” Autom. Construct., 16(3), 392–407.
Leite, F., Akcamete, A., Akinci, B., Atasoy, G., and Kiziltas, S. (2011). “Analysis of modeling effort and impact of different levels of detail in building information models.” Autom. Construct., 20(5), 601–609.
Malone, T. W., et al. (1999). “Tools for inventing organizations: Toward a handbook of organizational processes.” Manage. Sci., 45(3), 425–443.
March, J. G., and Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations, Wiley, New York.
Marsh, L., and Flanagan, R. (2000). “Measuring the costs and benefits of information technology in construction.” Eng. Construct. Architect. Manag., 7(4), 423–435.
Moran, T. P., and Carroll, J. M. (1996). Design rationale: Concepts, techniques, and use, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
Nickerson, J. V., Corter, J. E., Tversky, B., Zahner, D., and Rho, Y. J. (2008). “Diagrams as tools in the design of information systems.” Design computing and cognition, J. S. Gero and A. K. Goel, eds., Springer, Atlanta, 103–122.
Norman, D. (1993). “The power of representation.” Things that make us smart, Perseus, Reading, MA, 43–76.
Paulson, B. C. J. (1976). “Designing to reduce construction costs.” J. Constr. Div., 102(4), 587–592.
Pirolli, P. (2007). Information foraging theory: Adaptive interaction with information, Oxford University Press, New York.
Pracht, W. E. (1986). “GISMO: A visual problem-structuring and knowledge-organization tool.” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., 16(2), 265–270.
Regli, W. C., Hu, X., Atwood, M., and Sun, W. (2000). “A survey of design rationale systems: Approaches, representation, capture and retrieval.” Eng. Comput., 16(3–4), 209–235.
Senescu, R., Aranda-Mena, G., and Haymaker, J. (2011). “Relationships between project complexity and communication.” J. Manage. Eng., 183–197.
Senescu, R. R., and Haymaker, J. R. (2013). “Evaluating and improving the effectiveness and efficiency of design process communication.” Adv. Eng. Inform., 27(2), 299–313.
Senescu, R. R., Head, A. W., Steinert, M., and Fischer, M. A. (2012). “Generating a network of information dependencies automatically.” Proc., 14th Int. Dependency and Structure Modelling Conf., Carl Hanser Verlag, Munich, Germany, 139–144.
Shen, W., et al. (2010). “Systems integration and collaboration in architecture, engineering, construction, and facilities management: A review.” Adv. Eng. Inform., 24(2), 196–207.
Simon, H. A. (1981). “Cognitive science: The newest science of the artificial.” Cogn. Sci., 4(1), 33–46.
Singh, V., Gu, N., and Wang, X. (2011). “A theoretical framework of a BIM-based multi-disciplinary collaboration platform.” Autom. Construct., 20(2), 134–144.
Steward, D. (1981). “The design structure matrix: A method for managing the design of complex systems.” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., 28(3), 74–87.
Strong, N. (2006). “Report on integrated practice.” American Institute of Architects, Washington, DC.
Tang, D., Zhu, R., Tang, J., Xu, R., and He, R. (2010). “Product design knowledge management based on design structure matrix.” Adv. Eng. Inform., 24(2), 159–166.
Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action; social science bases of administrative theory, McGraw Hill, New York.
Tobias, J., and Haymaker, J. (2007). “A model-based LCA process on Stanford University’s green dorm.” Proc., Int. Life Cycle Assessment and Management Conf., Portland, OR.
Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization, Free Press, Glencoe, IL.
Winograd, T. (2006). “Shifting viewpoints: Artificial intelligence and human–computer interaction.” Artif. Intell., 170(18), 1256–1258.
Wix, J. (2007). Information delivery manual: Guide to components and development methods, BuildingSMART, Norway.
Young, N., Jr., Jones, S. A., and Bernstein, H. M. (2007). “Interoperability in the construction industry.” SmartMarket report: Design & construction intelligence, McGraw Hill Construction.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Architectural Engineering
Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 20Issue 1March 2014

History

Received: Aug 12, 2012
Accepted: Jan 11, 2013
Published online: Jan 14, 2013
Published in print: Mar 1, 2014
Discussion open until: May 5, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Reid R. Senescu, Ph.D. [email protected]
P.E.
Lecturer, Center for Design Research, Stanford Univ., 419 Lagunita Dr. No. 40, Stanford, CA 94305 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
John R. Haymaker, Ph.D. [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Schools of Architecture and Building Construction, Georgia Institute of Technology, 280 Ferst Dr., Room 108, Atlanta, GA 30332-0680. E-mail: [email protected]
Sebastjan Meža [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy, Univ. of Ljubljana, Jamova 2, Ljubljana, Slovenia. E-mail: [email protected]
Martin A. Fischer, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Center for Integrated Facility Engineering, Stanford Univ., Jerry Yang and Akiko Yamazaki Environment and Energy Building, 473 Via Ortega, Room 292, Stanford, CA 94305. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share