TECHNICAL PAPERS
Nov 5, 2010

Wind-Uplift Capacity of Residential Wood Roof-Sheathing Panels Retrofitted with Insulating Foam Adhesive

Publication: Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 17, Issue 4

Abstract

This research evaluated and compared the wind-uplift capacity of wood roof-sheathing panels fabricated by using nails with retrofitted roof panels made with nails and closed-cell sprayed polyurethane foam (ccSPF) adhesive. In hurricane-prone areas, structural retrofits of light-framed wood roof structures are needed to mitigate wind damage to existing residential roof structures because the majority of these have inadequate design strength to resist hurricane-force winds. A steel pressure chamber connected to a pressure loading actuator was used to conduct uplift pressure tests on 186 roof panels. The panels were fabricated using 11.1 mm (7/16 in.) thick oriented strand board sheathing fastened to nominal 51 by 102 mm (2 by 4 in.) southern yellow pine framing members spaced 610 mm (24 in.) apart. There were 123 panels tested in typical as-built conditions, and 63 panels tested after they were retrofitted with ccSPF. The parametric study determined the effect of several factors on wind-uplift failure pressure: (1) three nail types, (2) two nail spacings, and (3) three retrofit methods using ccSPF. The hypothesis tested was that ccSPF (traditionally used as wall and roof insulation in houses) could also act as a structural adhesive to increase the wind resistance of existing roofs. Standardized tests do not currently exist for wood roof panels, and so a uniform, static pressure-test protocol was developed on the basis of the ASTM E330, Method B Test Procedure. The results showed that ccSPF retrofits increase the wind-uplift capacity of the pre-1994 code-minimum wood roof panels by as much as 250–300%. This finding is important because it could provide a means to improve the wind resistance of these older roof designs, which may still account for more than 60% of the existing residential inventory. The distributions of roof-failure capacities of as-built and retrofitted roof panels are presented, and statistical parameters are presented for use in developing performance-based design criteria. The documentation and approach is presented as a model test protocol as the basis of a standardized wind-uplift test method for wood roof-sheathing panels.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The writers are appreciative of the financial support provided by corporate sponsors, Honeywell Specialty Materials, Huntsman Polyurethanes, and NCFI Polyurethanes. The research was supported in part by the State of Florida’s Department of Community Affairs through a research grant no. UNSPECIFIED08RC-B5-13-00-05-162. Technical advice was provided by Dr. Richard Duncan, Technical Director, Spray Polyurethane Foam Alliance; Dr. Jinhuang Wu of Huntsman; and Mr. Jason Hoerter of NCFI Polyurethanes. The first writer gratefully acknowledges financial support provided by the University of Florida Alumni Fellowship.

References

Amirkhanian, S., Sparks, P., and Watford, S. (1994). “A statistical analysis of wind damage to single-family dwellings due to Hurricane Hugo.” Structures Congress XII, ASCE, Reston, VA, 1042–1047.
ASTM. (1994). “Standard test method for structural performance of sheet metal roof and siding systems by uniform static air pressure difference.” ASTM E1592-94, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2004). “Standard test method for structural performance of exterior windows, doors, skylights and curtain walls by uniform static air pressure difference.” ASTM E330-02, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2006). “Standard test methods for mechanical fasteners in wood.” ASTM D1761–06, West Conshohocken, PA.
Baskaran, A., and Dutt, O. (1997). “Performance of roof fasteners under simulated loading conditions.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 72(1–3), 389–400.
Buckner, J. L. (2009a). “Evaluation report of BASF Polyurethane Foam Enterprises, LLC SPRAYTITE 178 Series & COMFORT FOAM 178 Series for Florida product approval # FL 13001.1.” 〈http://www.floridabuilding.org/pr/pr_app_srch.aspx〉 (Jun. 8, 2010).
Buckner, J. L. (2009b). “Evaluation report of NCFI Polyurethanes “InsulStar Plus” insulating foam spray adhesive for Florida product approval # FL 9975.1 R2.” 〈http://www.floridabuilding.org/pr/pr_app_srch.aspx〉 (Jun. 8, 2010).
Cheung, J. C. K., Holmes, J. D., Melbourne, W. H., Lakshmanan, N., and Bowditch, P. (1997). “Pressures on a 1/10 scale model of the Texas Tech Building.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 69–71, 529–538.
Cognard, P. (2006). Handbook of adhesives and sealants, Vol. 2, Elsevier, Kidlington, UK.
Cook, R. L. Jr. (1991). “Lessons learned by a roof consultant.” Hurricane Hugo one year later, ASCE, Reston, VA, 144–152.
Cunningham, T. P. Jr. (1993). “Roof sheathing fastening schedules for wind uplift.” APA Rep. T92-28, APA—The Engineered Wood Association, Tacoma, WA.
Dikkers, R. D., Marshall, R. D., and Thom, H. C. S. (1970). “Hurricane Camille—August 1969: A survey of structural damage along the Mississippi gulf coast.” NBS Rep. 10393, National Bureau of Standards, Gaithersburg, MD, 67.
Eaton, K. J., and Mayne, J. R. (1975). “Measurement of wind pressures on two-story houses at Aylesbury.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 1(1), 67–109.
Factory Mutual Research Corp. (1992). Approval standard supplement no. 2 class number 4470 class I roof covers, Norwood, MA.
FEMA. (1993). “Building performance: Hurricane Iniki in Hawaii—Observations, recommendations, and technical guidance.” FIA-23, Washington, DC.
FEMA. (2005). “Summary report on building performance: 2004 hurricane season.” FEMA 490, Washington, DC.
Forest Products Laboratory (FPL). (1999). “Wood handbook: Wood as an engineering material.” General Technical Rep. FPL-GTR-113, Forest Service, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Madison, WI.
Ho, T. C. E., Surry, D., and Davenport, A. G. (1992). “Low building wind load variability with application to codes.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 43(pt3), 1787–1798.
International Hurricane Research Center (IHRC). (2004). “Hurricane loss reduction for housing in Florida: Final report, year 4.” Florida International Univ., Miami.
Jones, D. T. (1998). “Retrofit techniques using adhesives to resist wind uplift in wood roof systems.” M.S. thesis, Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC.
Kallem, M. R. (1997). “Roof sheathing attachment for high wind regions: Comparison of screws and nails.” M.S. thesis, Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC.
Kareem, A. (1985). “Structural performance and wind speed-damage correlation in Hurricane Alicia.” J. Struct. Eng., 111(12), 2596–2610.
Keith, E. L., and Rose, J. D. (1992). “Hurricane Andrew—Structural performance of buildings in southern Florida.” Rep. T92-21, American Plywood Association.
Levitan, M. L., and Mehta, K. C. (1992). “Texas Tech field experiments for wind loads part 1. Building and pressure measuring system.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 43(pt3), 1565–1576.
Liu, Z. (2006). “Field measurements and wind tunnel simulation of Hurricane wind loads on single family dwellings.” Ph.D. dissertation, Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC.
Marshall, R. D. (1991). “Lessons learned by a wind engineer.” Hurricane Hugo one year later, ASCE, Reston, VA, 160–169.
McCarty, C., and Smith, S. K. (2005). “Florida’s 2004 hurricane season: Local effects.” Florida Focus, 1(3).
Mehta, K. C., Minor, J. E., McDonald, J. R., and Reinhold, T. A. (1981). “Valuable information from wind-caused damage in Hurricane Frederic.” Fourth U.S. National Conf. on Wind Engineering Research, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Washington, Seattle, 42–45.
Mizzell, D. P. (1994). “Wind resistance of sheathing for residential roofs.” M.S. thesis, Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC.
Murphy, S., Schiff, S., Rosowsky, D., and Pye, S. (1996). “System effects and uplift capacity of roof sheathing fasteners.” Structures Congress XIV, S. K. Ghosh, and J. Mohammadi, eds., ASCE, Reston, VA, 765–770.
National Association of Home Builders (NAHB). (2003). “Roof sheathing connection tolerances.” Prepared for the U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development, NAHB Research Center, Upper Marlboro, MD.
Parker, D. S. (2005). “Literature review of the impact and need for attic ventilation in Florida homes.” FSEC-CR-1496-05, Florida Solar Energy Center, Cocoa, FL.
Prevatt, D. O. (2007a). “Improving the wind uplift capacity of wood roof panels retrofitted with ccSPF adhesives.” Rep. No. 04-07, Dept. of Civil and Coastal Engineering, Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Prevatt, D. O. (2007b). “Wind uplift behavior of wood roof sheathing panels retrofitted with spray-applied polyurethane foam.” Rep. No. 03-07, Dept. of Civil and Coastal Engineering, Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Prevatt, D. O. (2010). “Field evaluation of thermal performance and energy efficiency of ccSPF retrofitted vented residential attic.” Rep. No. UF01-10, Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Shanmugam, B., Nielson, B. G., and Prevatt, D. O. (2009). “Statistical and analytical models for roof components in existing light-framed wood structures.” Eng. Struct., 31(11), 2607–2616.
Sherman, M. D. (2000). “Effect of loading rate on capacities of nailed connections and fasteners in wood.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC.
Smith, T. L. (2005). “The hurricanes of 2004: An overview of FEMA’s findings and recommendations for roof system performance.” Professional Roofing Magazine, 〈http://www.professionalroofing.net/article.aspx?id=710〉.
Sparks, P. R. (1991). “Damages and lessons learned from Hurricane Hugo.” NIST Spec. Publ. 820, 435–450.
Stephens, M. A. (1986). “Tests based on EDF statistics.” Goodness-of-fit techniques, R. B. D’Agostino, and M. A. Stephens, eds., Marcel Dekker, New York.
Sutt, E. G. Jr. (2000). “The effect of combined shear and uplift forces on roof sheathing panels.” Ph.D. thesis, Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC.
Turner, M. A., Plaut, R. H., Dillard, D. A., Loferski, J. R., and Caudill, R. (2009). “Tests of adhesives to augment nails in wind uplift resistance of roofs.” J. Struct. Eng., 135(1), 88–93.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2003). “Census of population and housing (2000).” U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, Washington, DC.
van de Lindt, J. W., Graettinger, A., Gupta, R., Skaggs, T., Pryor, S., and Fridley, K. (2007). “Performance of wood frame structures during Hurricane Katrina.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 21(2), 108–116.
Wolfe, R. W., and McCarthy, M. (1989). “Structural performance of light-frame roof assemblies, I. Truss assemblies with high truss stiffness variability.” FPL-RP-492, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Architectural Engineering
Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 17Issue 4December 2011
Pages: 144 - 154

History

Received: Mar 23, 2010
Accepted: Nov 3, 2010
Published online: Nov 5, 2010
Published in print: Dec 1, 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Peter L. Datin, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Catastrophe Modeler, RMS Inc., 7575 Gateway Blvd., Newark, CA 94560; formerly, Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Coastal Engineering, 365 Weil Hall, P.O. Box 116580, Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-6580, USA. E-mail: [email protected]
David O. Prevatt, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Assistant Professor, Civil and Coastal Engineering, Engineering School of Sustainable Infrastructure & Environment, Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-6580, USA (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Weichiang Pang, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Glenn Dept. of Civil Engineering, Clemson Univ., 312 Lowry Hall, Clemson, SC 29634-0911, USA. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share