Free access
FEATURES
Apr 1, 2009

Consulting Engineers: Myers-Briggs Type and Temperament Preferences

Publication: Leadership and Management in Engineering
Volume 9, Issue 2

Abstract

Myers-Briggs Type Indicator results from 740 professional employees of consulting engineering firms show that a greater percentage of consulting engineers have a Type preference for Introversion over Extraversion, Intuition over Sensing, Thinking over Feeling, and Judging over Perceiving than the national U.S. population. Substantially more consulting engineers have a Intuition-Thinking temperament than the national U.S. population. The differences in Type and temperament between consulting engineers, their clients, and the public can create communication challenges. The full range of Type and temperament preferences are of value in the diverse mix of work and related interactions with clients and the public inherent in the consulting engineering field. However 96 percent of individuals with Extraversion and Feeling preferences who enroll in engineering transfer to other fields in the first two years of college. Adjusting the first-year curricula so that individuals can see the value of their Feeling and Extraversion preferences in the world of consulting could lead to a more balanced mix of Types and temperaments within the pool of graduate engineers that can be drawn upon by consulting engineering firms.

Formats available

You can view the full content in the following formats:

References

Culp, G., and Smith, A. (2001). “Understanding psychological type to improve project team performance.” J. Manage. Eng., 17(1), 24–33.
Culp, G., and Smith, A. (2005a). “Leadership effectiveness and behavior.” Leadership Manage. Eng., 5(2), 39–47.
Culp, G., and Smith, A. (2005b). The lead dog has the best view: Leading your project team to success, ASCE, Reston, Va.
Keirsey, D., and Bates, M. (1978). Please understand me, Prometheus Nemesis Books, Del Mar, Calif.
McCaulley, M. H., Macdaid, G. P., and Walsh, R. (1987). “Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and retention in engineering.” British J. Eng. Educ., 3, 99–109.
Myers, K. D., and Kirby, L. (1994). Introduction to type dynamics and development, exploring the next level of type, Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc., Mountain View, Calif.
Myers, I. B., McCaulley, M. H., Quenk, N. L., and Hammer, A. L. (1998). MBTI Manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc., Mountain View, Calif.
Thomas, A., Benne, M. R., Marr, M. J., Thomas, E. W., and Hume, R. M. (2000). “The evidence remains stable: The MBTI predicts attraction and attrition in an engineering program.” J. Psychol. Type, 55, 35–42.
Tieger, P. D., and Barron-Tieger, B. (1998). The art of speed reading people, Little, Brown and Company, Boston, Mass.

Biographies

Gordon Culp is a principal at Smith Culp Consulting, Las Vegas, NV, and can be reached by e-mail at [email protected]. Anne Smith is president of Smith Culp Consulting.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Leadership and Management in Engineering
Leadership and Management in Engineering
Volume 9Issue 2April 2009
Pages: 65 - 70

History

Received: Oct 14, 2008
Accepted: Jan 22, 2009
Published online: Apr 1, 2009
Published in print: Apr 2009

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Gordon Culp, F.ASCE
P.E.
Anne Smith, M.ASCE
P.E.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share