Legal Challenge to a Best-Value Procurement System
Publication: Leadership and Management in Engineering
Volume 6, Issue 1
Abstract
The U.S. highway industry has witnessed increased use of design/build project delivery and best-value procurement in the last decade. The industry is experiencing the growing pains of venturing into territory that was previously left to other sectors of design and construction. Inexperience with the system and the processes behind these systems by all parties, state highway agencies, designers, and contractors has occasionally led to protest filed with the court system. The precedents set by the decisions of the court will have a lasting effect on the industry as the exploration of delivery and procurement systems continue. One state highway agency that utilized a two-step best-value procurement process received a protest from one of the firms that was not successful in passing the qualifications phase of the procurement. The court found evidence to uphold the decision of the state highway agency through the transparent and documented evaluation process established by the state highway agency. Continued exploration of new and different technologies and ideas for procurement and delivery of highway projects will result in legal challenges to the system as all parties involved work to gain an understanding of the processes. This paper is an examination of one state highway agency’s experience with an alternative to the highway industry’s typical low-bid procurement system.
Formats available
You can view the full content in the following formats:
References
Beard, J. L., Loulakis, M. C., and Wundram, E. C. (2001). Design build: Planning through development, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Federal Acquisitions Regulations (FAR). (2005). “Subpart 36.3—Two-phase design-build selection procedures.” Federal Acquisitions Regulations, ⟨http://www.acqnet.gov/far/⟩ (July 5, 2005).
Gransberg, D. D., and Senadheera, S. P. (1999). “Design-build contract award methods for transportation projects.” J. Transp. Eng., 125(6), 565–567.
Minnesota Revisor of Statutes (MRS). (2001). Minnesota session laws 2001, 1st special session, chapter 8, article 3, section 5, MRS, Saint Paul, Minn.
Minnesota Revisor of Statutes (MRS). (2004). Minnesota Statutes 2004, section 161.3420, subdivision 3, MRS, Saint Paul, Minn.
Molenaar, K. R., and Gransberg, D. D. (2001). “Design-builder selection for small highway projects.” Eng. Manage. J., 17(4), 214–223.
Molenaar, K. R., Songer, A. D., and Barash, M. (1999). “Public sector design/build evaluation and performance.” Eng. Manage. J., 15(2), 54–62.
Parvin, C. (2000). “Design-build: Evaluation and award,” Roads and Bridges, 38(12), 12.
Tenah, K. A. (2001). “Project delivery systems for construction: An overview.” Cost Engineering, AACE International, 43(1), 30–36.
Biographies
Jennifer Shane is a PhD candidate in the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering at the University of Colorado, Boulder, and can be reached via e-mail at [email protected]. Douglas D. Gransberg is associate professor in the Construction Science Division at the University of Oklahoma. Keith R. Molenaar is assistant professor in the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering at the University of Colorado, Boulder, and can be reached via e-mail at [email protected]. Joseph R. Gladke is design/build program director at the Minnesota Department of Transportation, and can be reached via e-mail at [email protected].
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2006 ASCE.
History
Published online: Jan 1, 2006
Published in print: Jan 2006
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.