Discrete Simulations of Laboratory Loading Conditions
Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 9, Issue 4
Abstract
It is well known that all three principal stresses play a role in the stress-strain-strength-volume response of solids and granular materials, yet conventional triaxial compression tests and direct shear tests are typically used for the determination of design parameters for granular materials, even when field conditions may be plane strain (e.g., behind a long retaining wall). The effects of loading conditions on the macroscale response of granular materials have been studied extensively using experimental methods and it is relatively straightforward to quantify the variations in material macroresponse using continuum constitutive equations. However, these methods provide relatively little insight into the driving micromechanics that govern macroscale behavior, particularly in soils that fail via regions of high localized strain (e.g., shear banding). Thus, it is desirable to develop a set of models that reproduce the expected macroscopic behavior and allow insight into the governing microscale mechanics. To this end, a series of numerical experiments has been performed to assess the effects of loading (i.e., boundary) conditions on particulate material response. Three-dimensional discrete numerical specimens, with the same material and model properties but different problem geometries, were assembled to similar void ratios and confining stresses and then subjected to plane strain compression, conventional triaxial compression, and direct shear loading conditions. Macroscale responses, including deviatoric stress (plain strain and conventional triaxial compression) or stress ratio (direct shear), volumetric strain, friction angle, and dilation angle of the specimens are investigated. Shear strength relationships of the three different loading conditions are explored. Small-strain response and the volume change response are studied. Simulated material response is generally in good agreement with previously published results from laboratory investigations though some significant differences are noted and discussed. Given that the models reasonably produce boundary condition effects, it may be possible in the future to exploit the discrete nature of the simulations to observe changes in material microstructure under different boundary conditions and to infer how micromechanics influences the macroresponse of the assemblies.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
Funding for the first writer was provided by the NCSU Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering. This support is gratefully acknowledged.
References
Bardet, J. P. (1994). “Observations on the effects of particle rotations on the failure of idealized granular materials.” Mech. Mater., 18(2), 159–182.
Belheine, N., Plassiard, J.-P., Donze, F.-V., Darve, F., and Seridi, A. (2009). “Numerical simulation of drained triaxial test using 3D discrete element modeling.” Comput. Geotech., 36, 320–331.
Bolton, M. D. (1986). “Strength and dilatancy of sands.” Geotechnique, 36(1), 65–78.
Cornforth, D. H. (1964). “Some experiments on influence of strain conditions on strength of sand.” Geotechnique, 14(2), 143–167.
Cui, L., and O’Sullivan, C. (2006). “Exploring the macro- and micro-scale response of an idealized of an granular material in the direct shear apparatus.” Geotechnique, 56(7), 455–468.
Cui, L., O’Sullivan, C., and O’Neill, S. (2007). “An analysis of the triaxial apparatus using a mixed boundary three-dimensional discrete element model.” Geotechnique, 57(10), 831–844.
Cundall, P. A., and Strack, O. D. L. (1979). “A discrete numberical model for granular assemblies.” Geotechnique29(1), 47–65.
Drescher, A., Vardoulakis, I., and Han, C. (1990). “A biaxial apparatus for testing soils.” Geotech. Test. J., 13(3), 226–234.
Evans, T. M. (2005). “Microscale physical and numerical investigations of shear banding in granular soils.” Ph.D. thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.
Evans, T. M., and Frost, J. D. (2007). “Shear banding and microstructure evolution in 2D numerical experiments.” Geotechnical special publication No. 173: Advances in measurement and modeling of soil behavior, ASCE, Reston, Va.
Evans, T. M., and Zhao, X. (2008). “A discrete numerical study of the effect of loading conditions on granular material.” Proc., 4th Int. Symp. on Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials, IS-Atlanta, Millpress, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 907–914.
Finn, W. D. L., Wade, N. H., and Lee, K. L. (1967). “Volume changes in triaxial and plane strain test.” J. Soil Mech. and Found. Div., 93, 297–308.
Frost, J. D. (1989). “Studies on the monotonic and cyclic behavior of sands.” Ph.D. thesis, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, Ind.
Hanna, A. (2001). “Determination of plane-strain shear strength of sand from the results of triaxial tests.” Can. Geotech. J., 38(6), 1231–1240.
Henkel, D. J., and Wade, N. H. (1966). “Plane strain tests on a saturated remolded clay.” J. Soil Mech. and Found. Div., 92(6), 67–80.
Hettler, A., and Vardoulakis, I. (1984). “Behaviour of dry sand tested in a large triaxial apparatus.” Geotechnique, 34(2), 183–197.
Itasca Consulting Group. (2006). PFC3D: Particle flow code in three dimensions, PFC3D, Minneapolis, Vol. 3.1.
Jacobson, D. E., Valdes, J. R., and Evans, T. M. (2007). “A numerical view into direct shear specimen size effects.” Geotech. Test. J., 30(6), 1–5.
Jewell, R. A. (1989). “Direct shear tests on sand.” Geotechnique, 39(2), 309–322.
Kramer, S. L. (1996). Geotechnical earthquake engineering, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.
Lee, K. L. (1970). “Comparison of plane strain and triaxial tests on sand.” J. Soil Mech. and Found. Div., 96(3), 901–923.
Leussink, H., and Wittke, W. (1964). “Difference in triaxial and plain strain shear strength.” American Society for Testing and Materials—Technical Publication No. 361, Philadelphia, 168–174.
Liu, S. H. (2006). “Simulating a direct shear box test by DEM.” Can. Geotech. J., 43(2), 155–168.
Mooney, M. A., Finno, R. J., and Viggiani, M. G. (1998). “A unique critical state for sand?” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 124(11), 1100–1108.
Ng, T. T. (2006). “Input parameters of discrete element methods.” J. Eng. Mech., 137(2), 723–729.
Ni, Q., Powrie, W., Zhang, X., and Harkness, R. (2000). “Effect of particle properties on soil behaviour: 3-D numerical modelling of shearbox tests.” Proc., GeoDenver 2000 ‘Numerical Methods in Geotechnical Engineering,’ ASCE, Reston, Va., 58–70.
O’Sullivan, C., and Bray, J. D. (2004). “Selecting a suitable time step for discrete element simulations that use the central difference time integration scheme.” Eng. Comput., 21(2–4), 278–303.
Peric, D., Runesson, K., and Sture, S. (1992). “Evaluation of plastic bifurcation for plane strain versus axisymmetry.” J. Eng. Mech., 118(3), 512–524.
Powrie, W., Ni, Q., Harkness, R. M., and Zhang, X. (2005). “Numerical modelling of plane strain tests on sands using a particulate approach.” Geotechnique, 55(4), 297–306.
Proctor, D. C., and Barton, R. R. (1974). “Measurements of the angle of interparticle friction.” Geotechnique, 24(4), 581–604.
Ramamurthy, T., and Tokhi, V. K. (1981). “Relation of triaxial and plane strain strengths.” Proc., Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Vol. 1, Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 755–758.
Ramamurthy, T., and Tokhi, V. K. (1989). “Plane strain strength from triaxial test.” Proc., Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Vol. 1, Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 749–752.
Rowe, P. W. (1962). “The stress-dilatancy relation for static equilibrium of an assembly of particles in contact.” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 269, 500–527.
Rowe, P. W. (1969). “Relation between shear strength of sands in triaxial compression plane strain and direct shear.” Geotechnique, 19(1), 75–86.
Santamarina, J. C., Klein, K. A., and Fam, M. A. (2001). Soils and waves, Wiley, West Sussex, U.K.
Tatsuoka, F. (1987). “Discussion of ‘The strength and dilatancy of sands’ by M. D. Bolton.” Geotechnique, 37(2), 219–226.
Thornton, C. (2000). “Numerical simulations of deviatoric shear deformation of granular media.” Geotechnique, 50(1), 43–53.
Vaid, Y. P., and Campanella, R. G. (1974). “Triaxial and plane strain behavior of natural clay.” J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., 100(3), 207–224.
Wood, D. M. (2004). Geotechnical modeling, Spon Press, London.
Wu, P. K., Matsushima, K., and Tatsuoka, F. (2008). “Effect of specimen size and some other factors on the strength and deformation of granular soil in direct shear test.” Geotech. Test. J., 31(1), 1–20.
Yang, C. (2002). “Boundary condition and inherent stratigraphic effects on microstructure evolution in sand specimens.” Ph.D. thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Atlanta.
Zeghal, M., and El Shamy, U. (2004). “A continuum-discrete hydromechanical analysis of granular deposit liquefaction.” Int. J. Numer. Analyt. Meth. Geomech., 28, 1361–1383.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2009 ASCE.
History
Received: Mar 10, 2008
Accepted: Mar 24, 2009
Published online: Jul 15, 2009
Published in print: Aug 2009
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.