TECHNICAL PAPERS
Oct 1, 2008

Comparison of Extractants for Removal of Lead, Zinc, and Phenanthrene from Manufactured Gas Plant Field Soil

Publication: Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management
Volume 12, Issue 4

Abstract

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and heavy metals found at former manufactured gas plant (MGP) sites are of major environmental concern. An investigation is made into evaluating the capability of various extractants including surfactants, cosolvents, chelating agents, acids, and cyclodextrins for removing phenanthrene, lead, and zinc from a contaminated MGP soil. The determination of the most promising extracting solutions is critical for the development of effective treatment technologies such as soil washing/flushing and electrokinetic remediation. MGP contaminated soil was silty sand with 11% organic matter containing higher levels of phenanthrene and two heavy metals (lead and zinc). Several batch tests were conducted using the soil with different extracting solutions at various concentrations to enhance the removal efficiency and to optimize the concentration of each extractant. The test results showed that both surfactants (Igepal CA-720 and Tween 80) at a wide range of concentrations were effective for the removal of phenantherene from the soil. Only selective cosolvents and cyclodextrins (n-butylamine and HPCD) at higher concentrations were found to be effective in the solubilization of phenanthrene. Selective acids (citric acid and phosphoric acid) were found to be effective in the removal of heavy metals, while chelating agents (EDTA and DTPA) resulted in a moderate heavy metal removal. Overall, none of the selected extractants removed both heavy metals and PAHs; therefore, sequential extraction schemes using the selected extractants were investigated. The sequential use of 5% Tween 80 followed by 1M citric acid was found to remove over 90% phenanthrene and over 70% lead and nickel each from the MGP soil.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). (1996). Annual book of standards, Vol. 4.08, ASTM, Philadelphia.
Augustijn, D. C. M., Jessup, R. E., Rao, S. C., and Wood, A. L. (1994). “Remediation of contaminated soils by solvent flushing.” J. Environ. Eng., 120(1), 42–57.
Brusseau, M. L., Wang, X., and Wang, W. (1997). “Simultaneous elution of heavy metals and organic compounds from soil by cyclodextrin.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 31, 1087–1092.
Edwards, D. A., Adeel, Z., and Luthy, R. G. (1994). “Distribution of nonionic surfactant and phenanthrene in a sediment/aqueous system.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 28, 1550–1560.
Ko, S., Schlautmann, M. A., and Carraway, E. R. (1999). “Partitioning of hydrophobic organic compounds to hydroxypropyl- β -cyclodextrin: Experimental studies and model predictions for surfactant-enhanced remediation applications.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 33, 2765–2770.
Li, A., Cheung, K. A., and Reddy, K. R. (2000). “Cosolvent-enhanced electrokinetic remediation of soils contaminated with phenanthrene.” J. Environ. Eng., 126(6), 527–533.
McCray, J. E., Boving, T. B., and Brusseau, M. L. (2000). “Cyclodextrin-enhanced solubilization of organic contaminants with implications for aquifer remediation.” Ground Water Monit. Rem., 20, 94–103.
Neale, C. N., Bicka, R. M., and Chao, A. C. (1997). “Evaluating acids and chelating agents for removing heavy metals from contaminated soils.” Environ. Prog., 16, 274–279.
Patterson, I. F., Chowdhry, B. Z., and Leharne, S. A. (1999). “Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon extraction from a coal tar contaminated soil using aqueous solutions of nonionic surfactants.” Chemosphere, 38, 3017–3095.
Peters, C. A., and Luthy, R. G. (1993). “Coal tar dissolution in water-miscible solvents: Experimental evaluation.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 27, 2831–2843.
Reddy, K. R., and Chinthamreddy, S. (2000). “Comparison of extractants for removing heavy metals from contaminated clayey soils.” Soil Sediment Contam., 9, 449–462.
Reddy, K. R., Parupudi, U. S., Devulapalli, S. N., and Xu, C. Y. (1997). “Effect of soil composition on the removal of chromium by electrokinetics.” J. Hazard. Mater., 55, 135–158.
Reddy, K. R., and Saichek, R. E. (2003). “Effect of soil type on electrokinetic removal of phenanthrene using surfactants and cosolvents.” J. Environ. Eng., 129(4), 336–346.
Roote, D. S. (1998). “In situ flushing.” Technology Overview Rep. No. TO-97-02, Groundwater Remediation Technologies Analysis Center, Pittsburgh.
Saichek, R. E. (2002). “Electrokinetically enhanced in situ flushing for HOC-contaminated soils.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago.
Schwarzenbach, R. P., Gshwend, P. M., and Imboden, D. M. (1993). Environmental organic chemistry, Wiley, New York.
Sharma, H. D., and Reddy, K. R. (2004). Geoenvironmental engineering: Site remediation, waste containment, and emerging waste management technologies, Wiley, New York.
Staples, C. A., and Geiselmann, S. J. (1988). “Cosolvent influences on organic solute retardation factors.” Ground Water, 26, 192–198.
Tuin, B. J. W., and Tels, M. (1990). “Removing heavy metals from contaminated clay soils by extraction with hydrochloric acid, EDTA or hypochlorite solutions.” Environ. Technol., 11, 1039–1045.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (1986). Test methods for evaluating solid waste laboratory manual physical/chemical methods, SW-846, 3rd Ed., US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington, D.C.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (1997). “Cleaning up the nation’s waste sites: Markets and technology trends.” EPA 542-R-96-005, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, U.S. Environmental protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2000). “A resource for MGP site characterization and remediation.” EPA/542-R-00-005, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
Wang, X., and Brusseau, M. L. (1993). “Solubilization of some low-polarity organic compounds by hydroxypropyl- β -cyclodextrin.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 27, 2821–2825.
Yeom, I. T., Ghosh, M. M., and Cox, C. D. (1996). “Kinetic aspects of surfactant solubilization of soil-bound polycylic aromatic hydrocarbons.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 30, 1589–1595.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management
Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management
Volume 12Issue 4October 2008
Pages: 230 - 238

History

Received: Oct 3, 2005
Accepted: Dec 3, 2007
Published online: Oct 1, 2008
Published in print: Oct 2008

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Kranti Maturi
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Materials Engineering, Univ. of Illinois at Chicago, 842 West Taylor St., Chicago, IL 60607.
Amid P. Khodadoust
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Materials Engineering, Univ. of Illinois at Chicago, 842 West Taylor St., Chicago, IL 60607.
Krishna R. Reddy, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Materials Engineering, Univ. of Illinois at Chicago, 842 West Taylor St., Chicago, IL 60607 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share