Waste Isolation Pilot Plant as a Case Study for the Deployment of a National Repository Program
Publication: Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management
Volume 9, Issue 1
Abstract
The permanent disposal of nuclear wastes, such as transuranic (TRU) wastes, high-level wastes, and spent nuclear fuel, that require isolation over thousands of years (due to the presence of long-lived radionuclides and high activity), is a complex and contentious issue. Stakeholders that are active and dedicated participants in the debate represent a wide spectrum of divergent viewpoints, but maintain the same desired end goal of disposition of radioactive waste that is protective of the health and safety of the public and the environment and compliant with governing regulations. The dynamics and interactions among these stakeholders are important elements in determining the end state and conditions of any radioactive waste management or disposal program. In the United States, deep geologic disposal is the preferred option for the permanent disposal of these wastes, with the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) for the permanent disposal of defense-related TRU wastes being a successful operational facility for the past five years. The WIPP program provides a case study for future repository programs in the United States and in other countries, and highlights the need to achieve a “threshold stakeholder level of comfort” that addresses technical, political, economic, and societal issues in realizing the legitimacy of a repository program.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Channell, J. K., and Neill, R. (1999). “A comparison of the risks from the hazardous waste and radioactive waste portions of the WIPP inventory.” EEG-72, Environmental Evaluation Group, Albuquerque, N.M.
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). (2004). “Transport of radioactive materials.” 10 CFR 71, Title 10, Part 71, Washington, D.C.
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). (1993). “Environmental radiation protection standards for management and disposal of spent nuclear fuel, high-level and transuranic radioactive wastes.” 40 CFR 191, Title 40, Part 191, Washington, D.C.
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). (1996). “Criteria for the certification and recertification of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant’s compliance with the 40 CFR Part 191 disposal regulations.” 40 CFR 194, Title 40, Part 194, Washington, D.C.
Federal Register. (1976). 41(No. 243; December 16), 54994.
Federal Register. (1981). 46(No. 18; January 28), 9162.
Federal Register. (1983a). 48(No. 19; January 27), 3878.
Federal Register. (1983b). 48(No. 128; July 1), 30427.
Federal Register. (1985). 50(No. 182; September 19), 38066.
Federal Register. (1986). 51(No. 128; July 3), 24604.
Federal Register. (1990). 55(No. 133; July 11), 28397.
Federal Register. (1991a). 56(No. 18; January 28), 3038.
Federal Register. (1991b). 56(No. 29; February 12), 5731.
Federal Register. (1993a). 58(No. 26; February 10), 7924.
Federal Register. (1993b). 58(No. 242; December 20), 66398.
Federal Register. (1996). 61(No. 28; February 9), 5224.
Federal Register. (1998). 63(No. 95; May 18), 27354.
Kehrman, R. F., and Streng, D. (2004). “Almost five years how the WIPP permit has changed.” WM’04—Proc., Waste Management Conf., Tucson, Ariz, Waste Management Symposia, Tucson, Ariz.
McCombie, C. (2003). “Status of geological repositories for used nuclear fuel.” NWMO Background Paper 6-3, Nuclear Waste Management Organization, Toronto, Canada.
McCutcheon, C. (2002). “Nuclear reactions, The politics of opening a radioactive waste disposal site.” University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, N.M.
National Academy of Sciences. (2004). “Improving the characterization program for contact-handled transuranic waste bound for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant.” Board on Radioactive Waste Management, The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.
National Academy of Sciences–National Research Council. (1957). “Disposal of radioactive waste on land.” Report by the Committee on Waste Disposal, Division of Earth Sciences, The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.
New Mexico Administratic Code (NMAC). “New Mexico hazardous waste act.” 20.4.1 NMAC, Title 20, Chapter 4, Part 1, Santa Fe, N.M.
New Mexico Environment Department. (2004). “Waste Isolation Pilot Plant hazardous waste facility permit.” NM4890139088-TSDF, Santa Fe, N.M.
Powers, D. W., Lambert, S. J., Shaffer, S-E., Hill, L. R., and Weart, W. D., Eds. (1978). “Geological characterization report: Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) site, Southeastern New Mexico.” SAND78-1596, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, N.M.
Public Law 96-164. (1979). “Department of Energy National Security and Military Applications on Nuclear Energy Authorization Act of 1980.” Washington, D.C.
Public Law 97-425. (1983, as amended 1987). “Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, as amended by Public Law 100-202 and Public Law 100-203.” Washington, D.C.
Public Law 100-456. (1988). “National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1989.” Section 1433, Washington, D.C.
Public Law 102-579. (1992). “Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Land Withdrawal Act.” Washington, D.C.
Public Law 104-201. (1996). “National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997.” Washington, D.C.
Silva, M. (1991). “An assessment of the flammability and explosive potential of transuranic waste.” EEG-48, Environment Evaluation Group, Albuquerque, N.M.
Silva, M. K., Channell, J. K., Walker, B. A., and Anastas, G. (2003). “Contact handled transuranic waste characterization requirements at the Waste Iolation Pilot Plant.” EEG-86, Environmental Evaluation Group, Albuquerque, N.M.
State of New Mexico–U.S. Department of Energy. (1987). “Second modification to the 1981 agreement for consultation and cooperation with DOE and the State of New Mexico on WIPP.” Santa Fe, N.M.
U.S. Congress. (2002). “Yucca Mountain, Nevada nuclear waste repository.” House Joint Resolution 87, Washington, D.C.
U.S. Department of Energy. (2002). “Contact-handled transuranic waste acceptance criteria for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant.” DOE/WIPP-02-3122, Revision 0, Carlsbad Field Office, Carlsbad, N.M.
U.S. Department of Energy. (2004). “Safety analysis report for TRUPACT-II.” Revision 19c, Carlsbad Field Office, Carlsbad, N.M.
U.S. Department of Energy–Los Alamos National Laboratory (USDOE–LANL). (1998). “Sampling and analysis project validates acceptable knowledge on TA-55-43, Lot No. 1.” Revision 0, Carlsbad, N.M.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC). (1999). “Standard review plan for transportation packages for radioactive material.” NUREG-1609, Washington, D.C.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC). (2002a). Certificate of compliance No. 9279, Revision 1, Washington, D.C.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC). (2002b). Certificate of compliance No. 9212, Revision 2, Washington, D.C.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC). (2002c). Certificate of compliance No. 9204, Revision 8, Washington, D.C.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC). (2003). Certificate of compliance No. 9218, Revision 16, Washington, D.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management
Volume 9 • Issue 1 • January 2005
Pages: 45 - 58
Copyright
© 2005 ASCE.
History
Received: Aug 24, 2004
Accepted: Aug 24, 2004
Published online: Jan 1, 2005
Published in print: Jan 2005
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.