Performance of Nondestructive Radioassay Systems for Nuclear Waste
Publication: Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management
Volume 8, Issue 1
Abstract
A statistical analysis of the measurement performance of five mobile nondestructive assay systems currently in use for radioassay of nuclear waste was performed. Actual versus reported isotopic mass composition, reported versus actual measurement uncertainty, detection capability, and low level versus transuranic waste determination were assessed based on measurements of 11 surrogate waste drums. In terms of percent recovery the systems, for the most part, exhibited reasonable capabilities for estimating isotopic quantities in the surrogate waste drums. (By reasonable we mean, for example, that recovery values were in a range of 40% to 160% for most of the configurations tested.) While difference in performance on individual drums was quite large in some cases, nonparametric analysis of variance results for total plutonium and showed no statistically significant differences in the overall average percent recovery values for the systems evaluated. A similar analysis of the replicate standard deviations indicated significant differences between systems with regard to precision of measurements of total plutonium but not The weakest aspect of system performance was the reporting of measurement errors. Reported measurement error values routinely underestimated actual values for certain surrogate waste configurations.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Becker, G. K., and McIIwain, M. E. (1997). “Nondestructive assay system capability evaluation project test plan for transuranic contaminated waste forms.” INEEL/EXT-97-00181, Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory, Idaho Falls, Idaho.
Becker, G. K., McIIwain, M. E., and Connolly, M. J. (1998). “Mixed waste focus area/characterization monitoring sensor technology nondestructive waste assay capability evaluation project end-user summary report.” INEEL/EXT-98-01108, Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory, Idaho Falls, Idaho.
Conover, W. J. (1999). Practical nonparametric statistics, 3rd Ed., Wiley, New York.
Curie, L. A.(1968). “Limits for qualitative detection and quantitative determination.” Anal. Chem., 40(3), 586–593.
International Organization for Standardization. (1995). Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, 1st Ed., Zurich.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 26, 2002
Accepted: Apr 23, 2003
Published online: Dec 15, 2003
Published in print: Jan 2004
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.