Well-Purging Protocols for Sampling Dissolved Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Publication: Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management
Volume 4, Issue 2
Abstract
Traditionally, most guidelines for sampling contaminated ground water recommend purging wells prior to sampling. Recently, however, many environmental professionals are questioning the need for, and/or the desirability of, purging wells prior to sampling ground water for dissolved petroleum hydrocarbons. In an attempt to balance the costs associated with monitoring against the costs associated with the actual remedial activities at contaminated sites, several regulatory agencies are now permitting use of a no-purge sampling protocol under certain circumstances. This article summarizes the current controversy that exists with regard to well-purging protocols, and describes a project that was initiated in the state of Massachusetts to assess the issue. This assessment was primarily based upon comparison of BTEX levels (determined via traditional laboratory methods) in ground-water samples obtained both before and after purging. Data for this project were also obtained using an innovative field-screening tool called the “ChemSensor.” The results of this project suggest that, under certain conditions, a no-purge method of sampling may be appropriate during the long-term monitoring phases on sites contaminated with dissolved petroleum hydrocarbons. Although the data set obtained to date in Massachusetts is limited to three different geologic formations, it represents a useful extension of similar work completed in California and in New York, which is discussed herein. It is anticipated that this work will be useful to the profession as a starting point for examination of this timely issue.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Barcelona, M. J., and Helfrich, J. A. (1986). “Well construction and purging effects on groundwater samples.” Envir. Sci. and Technol., 20(11), 1179–1184.
2.
Barcelona, M. J., Wehrmann, H. A., and Varljen, M. D. (1994). Reproducible well-purging procedures and VOC stabilization criteria for ground-water sampling. Groundwater, 32(1), 12–22.
3.
Byrnes, J. P., Briglia, J. E., and Bealer, L. J. (1996). “Evaluation of well purging in ground-water sampling for BTEX and MTBE. Proc., 1996 API/NGWA Petr. Hydrocarbons Conf., National Ground Water Association, Westerville, Ohio.
4.
Gibb, J. P., Schuller, R. M., and Griffin, R. A. (1981). “Procedures for the collection of representative water quality data from monitoring wells.” Cooperative Groundwater Rep. 7, Illinois State Water and Geological Surveys, Champaign, Ill.
5.
Gibs, J., and Imbrigiotta, T. E. (1990). “Well-purging criteria for sampling purgeable organic compounds.” Groundwater, 28(1), 68–78.
6.
Herzog, B. L., Chou, S.-F., Valkenburg, J. R., and Griffin, R. A. (1988). “Changes in volatile organic chemical concentrations after purging slowly recovering wells.” GWMR, Fall, 93–99.
7.
Kearl, P. M., Korte, N. E., and Cronk, T. A. (1992). “Suggested modifications to ground water sampling procedures based on observations from the colloidal borescope.” GWMR, Spring, 155–161.
8.
Keely, J. F., and Boateng, K. (1987). “Monitoring well installation, purging, and sampling techniques—part 1: Conceptualizations.” Groundwater, 25(3), 300–313.
9.
Keely, J. F., and Boateng, K. (1987). “Monitoring well installation, purging, and sampling techniques—part 2: Case histories. Groundwater, 25(4), 427–439.
10.
Martin-Hayden, J. M., Robbins, G. A., and Bristol, R. D. (1991). “Mass balance evaluation of monitoring well purging—part II. Field tests at a gasoline contamination site.” J. Contaminant Hydrol., 8, 225–241.
11.
Powell, R. W., and Puls, R. W. (1993). “Passive sampling of groundwater monitoring wells without purging: Multilevel well chemistry and tracer disappearance.” J. Contaminant Hydrol., 12, 51–77.
12.
Puls, R. W., and Paul, C. J. (1995). “Low-flow purging and sampling of ground water monitoring wells with dedicated systems.” GWMR, 15(1), 116–123.
13.
Robbins, G. A., and Martin-Hayden, J. M. (1991). “Mass balance evaluation of monitoring well purging—part I. Theoretical models and implications for representative sampling.” J. Contaminant Hydrol., 8, 203–224.
14.
Robin, M. J. L., and Gillham, R. W. (1987). “Field evaluation of well purging procedures. GWMR, Fall, 85–93.
15.
Scalf, M. R., McNabb, J. F., Dunlap, W. J., Cosby, R. L., and Fryberger, J. (1981). Manual of ground-water quality sampling procedures. National Water Well Association, Worthington, Ohio.
16.
SECOR International, Inc. (1996). Final Rep.: The California Groundwater Purging Study for Petroleum Hydrocarbons. Prepared for the Western States Petroleum Association, Glendale, Calif.
17.
“Standard references for monitoring wells.” (1991). WSC-310-91, Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), Boston, Mass.
18.
Standards on ground water and vadose zone investigations. (1992). 23-418192-38, American Society for Testing and Materials, W. Conshohocken, Pa.
19.
USEPA. (1982). “Handbook for sampling and sample preservation of water and wastewater.” EPA-600/4-82/029, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management
Volume 4 • Issue 2 • April 2000
Pages: 44 - 52
History
Received: Dec 8, 1999
Published online: Apr 1, 2000
Published in print: Apr 2000
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.