Orientation to Health Risk Assessment for Practicing Engineers
Publication: Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management
Volume 2, Issue 1
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to acquaint the practicing engineer with the principles that underlie the health risk assessment process and provide an orientation to emerging techniques for dealing with the effects of contamination events. In the past decision makers were forced to rely on rudimentary methods of analysis that incorporated large safety factors to offset gaps in our knowledge base. Improvements in computational methods now allow for a more precise description of risk levels by incorporating inherent variability and uncertainty of the data into the analysis. This paper describes the elements of the risk assessment process and presents Probabilistic Health Risk Assessment (PHRA) as a tool for modeling the fate of contaminants. The common means of evaluating carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic materials are presented along with a brief discussion of the toxicological principles that underlie the methods. A guide to data sources and procedural references is provided along with suggestions of how to use PHRA in current practice.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Burmaster, D. E., and Appling, J. W.(1995). “Introduction to human health risk assessment, with an emphasis on contaminated properties.”Environment Reporter, 25(45), 2431–2440.
2.
Davidson, I. W. F., and Beliles, R. P. (1991). “Consideration of target organ toxicity of trichloroethylene in terms of metabolite toxicity and pharmacokinetics.”Drug Metabolic Rev., 23(5–6), 493–599.
3.
Larson, J. L., Wolf, D. C., and Butterworth, B. E.(1994). “Induced cytotoxicity and cell proliferation in hepatocarcinogenicity of chloroform in female B6C3F1 mice: comparison of administration by gavage in corn oil vs. Ad libitum in drinking water.”Fundamentals of Appl. Toxicology, 22, 90–102.
4.
Medinksy, M. A., Leavens, T. L., Csanaday, G. A., Gargas, M. L., and Bond, J. A.(1994). “In vivo metabolism of butadiene by mice and rats: a comparison of physiological model predictions and experimental data.”Carcinogenesis, 15(7), 1329–1340.
5.
Risk Assessment in the federal government: managing the process. (1983). Committee on the Institutional Means for Assessment of Risks to Public Health, Commission on Life Sciences, National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
6.
Science and judgment in risk assessment. (1994). National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
7.
Suter, G. W., II. (1993). Ecological risk assessment. Lewis Publishers, Ann Arbor, Mich.
8.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1988). “Superfund exposure assessment manual.”EPA 540/1-88/001, Washington, D.C.
9.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1989a). “Final report exposure factors handbook.”EPA/600/8-89/043, Office of Health and Environmental Assessment, Washington, D.C.
10.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1989b). “Risk assessment guidance for Superfund: volume 1—human health evaluation manual, part A.”EPA 540/1-89/002, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington, D.C.
11.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1990). “Risk assessment, management and communication of drinking water contamination.”EPA/625/4-89/024, Office of Research and Development, Washington, D.C.
12.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1991a). “Risk assessment guidance for Superfund: volume 1—human health evaluation manual, part B, development of risk-based preliminary remediation goals—interim.”EPA 540/R-92/004, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington, D.C.
13.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1991b). “Risk assessment guidance for Superfund: volume 1—human health evaluation manual, part C, risk evaluation of remedial alternatives—interim.”9285.7-01C, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington, D.C.
14.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1992). “Guidelines for exposure assessment.”57FR22888 et seq., May.
15.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1996). “Proposed guidelines for carcinogen risk assessment.”EPA/600/P-92/003C, Office of Research and Development, Washington, D.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management
Volume 2 • Issue 1 • January 1998
Pages: 22 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Jan 1, 1998
Published in print: Jan 1998
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.