TECHNICAL PAPERS
Sep 1, 2007

Probabilistic Approach for Design and Hydrologic Performance Assessment of Reconstructed Watersheds

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 133, Issue 9

Abstract

The oil sands mining industry in Canada has made a commitment to reclaim mining areas to an equivalent capability to that which existed prior to mining. An essential requirement in the design of reclamation covers to meet this objective is that all covers must have a sufficient available water holding capacity (AWHC) in order to supply sufficient moisture for vegetation over the summer moisture deficit typical in the region. AWHC is currently based on static evaluations of wilting point and field capacity under a constant annual evapotranspiration demand. This paper presents an alternative probabilistic approach by which the hydrologic performance of these reclamation soil covers can be assessed. A field-calibrated water balance model is used along with the available historical meteorological record to estimate the maximum soil moisture deficit that a soil cover is able to sustain over the growing season. Frequency curves of the maximum annual moisture deficit are used to assess the probability that a cover is able to provide any particular threshold of moisture demand. The method also allows for a quantification of the predictive uncertainty of the model. The predictive uncertainty is used as a margin of safety to estimate a design value of moisture deficit for various alternative cover designs. This paper recommends procedures for a frequency-based assessment and design of reclamation soil covers in the oil sands industry. This method takes into account climatic variability as well as parameter uncertainty in estimating the soil moisture deficit.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The writers would like to acknowledge the support of the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada through the Discovery Grant and the CRD program and also the support of Syncrude Canada Limited. The encouragement of Clara Qualizza, Environmental Scientist, Mildred Lake Mine, Syncrude Canada Limited, is very much appreciated. The excellent work of many graduate students is also acknowledged.

References

Albright, W. H., Benson, C. H., Gee, G. W., Roeslard, A. C., Abichou, T., Apiwantragoon, P., Lyles, B. F., and Rock, S. A. (2004). “Field water balance of landfill final covers.” J. Environ. Qual., 33(6), 2317–2332.
Barbour, S. L., Chapman, D., Qualizza, C., Kessler, S., Boese, C., Shurniak, R., Meiers, G., O’Kane, M., Hendry, J., and Wall, S. (2004). “Tracking the evolution of reclaimed landscapes through the use of instrumented watersheds—A brief history of the Syncrude Southwest 30 Overburden Reclamation Research Program.” Proc., Int. Instrumented Watershed Symp., Edmonton, Canada, ⟨www.rr.ualberta.ca/oilsands/IIWS.htm⟩.
Bastidas, L. A., Gupta, H. V., Hsu, K., and Sorooshian, S. (2003). “Parameter, structure, and model performance evaluation for land–surface schemes.” Calibration of watershed models, Q. Duan, H. V. Gupta, S. Sorooshian, A. N. Rousseau, and R. Turcotte, eds., American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C.
Boese, K. (2004). “The design and installation of a field instrumentation program for the evaluation of soil–atmosphere water fluxes in a vegetated cover over saline/sodic shale overburden.” MS thesis, Univ. of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask., Canada.
Borsuk, M. E., Stow, C. A., and Reckhow, K. H. (2002). “Predicting the frequency of water quality standard violations: A probabilistic approach for TMDL development.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 36(10), 2109–2115.
Dilks, D. W., and Freedman, P. L. (2004). “Improved consideration of the margin of safety in total maximum daily load development.” J. Environ. Eng., 130(6), 690–694.
Elshorbagy, A. (2005). “Predicting the uncertainty of watershed models using a simple Bayesian approach.” Proc., 17th Canadian Hydrotechnical Conf., Canadian Society for Civil Engineering, Edmonton, Atta., Canada, 1–10.
Elshorbagy, A. (2006). “Multicriterion decision analysis approach to assess the utility of watershed modeling for management decisions.” Water Resour. Res., 42(9), [W09407] 1–14.
Elshorbagy, A., Jutla, A., Barbour, S. L., and Kells, J. (2005). “System dynamics approach to assess the sustainability of reclamation of disturbed watersheds.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 32(1), 144–158.
Falkenmark, M. (1997). “Society’s interaction with the water cycle: A conceptual framework for a more holistic approach.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 42(4), 451–466.
Freer, J., Beven, K., and Ambroise, B. (1996). “Bayesian estimation of uncertainty in runoff prediction and the value of data: An application of the GLUE approach.” Water Resour. Res., 32(7), 2161–2173.
Hauser, V. L., Weand, B. L., and Gill, M. D. (2001). “Natural covers for landfills and buried waste.” J. Environ. Eng., 127(9), 768–775.
Hines, W. W., Montgomery, D. C., Goldsman, D. M., and Borror, C. M. (2003). Probability and statistics in engineering, Wiley, New York.
Jutla, A. (2006). “Hydrological modeling of reconstructed watersheds using the system dynamics approach.” MS thesis, Univ. of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask., Canada.
Jutla, A., Elshorbagy, A., and Kells, J. (2005). “Beyond rainfall–runoff modeling: Hydrologic simulation of reconstructed watersheds using system dynamics.” Proc., 17th Canadian Hydrotechnical Conf., Emonton, Alta., Canada, 11–20.
Khire, M. V., Benson, C. H., and Bosscher, P. J. (1997). “Water balance modeling of earthen final covers.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 123(8), 744–754.
Khire, M. V., Benson, C. H., and Bosscher, P. J. (2000). “Capillary barriers: Design variables and water balance.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 126(8), 695–708.
Leskiw, L. A. (2004). Land capability classification for forest ecosystems in the oil sands, Paragon Soil and Environmental Consulting Inc., Alta., Canada.
Mays, L. W. (2005). Water resources engineering, Wiley, New York.
National Research Council (NRC). (2001). Assessing the TMDDML approach to water quality management, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
Ormsbee, L., Elshorbagy, A., and Zechman, E. (2004). “Methodology for pH total maximum daily loads: Application to Beech Creek watershed.” J. Environ. Eng., 130(2), 167–174.
Palisade Corporation. (2004). Guide to using @RISK: Advanced risk analysis for spreadsheets, Palisade Corporation, Inc., New York.
Qualizza, C., Chapman, D., Barbour, S. L., and Purdy, B. (2004). “Reclamation research at Syncrude Canada’s mining operation in Alberta’s Athabasca oil sands region.” Proc., Int. Conf. on Ecological Restoration SER2004, Victoria, B. C., Canada, August 24–26.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 133Issue 9September 2007
Pages: 1110 - 1118

History

Received: Feb 27, 2006
Accepted: Jan 2, 2007
Published online: Sep 1, 2007
Published in print: Sep 2007

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Amin Elshorbagy, M.ASCE
Associate Professor, Centre for Advanced Numerical Simulation (CANSIM), Dept. of Civil and Geological Engineering, Univ. of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, 57 Campus Dr., Saskatoon SK, Canada S7N 5A9. E-mail: [email protected]
S. Lee Barbour
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Geological Engineering, Univ. of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, 57 Campus Dr., Saskatoon SK, Canada S7N 5A9. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share