Numerical Model for Analyzing Slug Tests in Vertical Cutoff Walls
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 133, Issue 10
Abstract
Analysis of a slug test estimating the hydraulic conductivity of a vertical cutoff wall is complicated by the high compressibility of backfill materials and by the proximity of a well to the edge of the cutoff wall. An implicit finite-difference program, named , was developed to analyze results of slug tests in the vertical cutoff wall. The program uses block-centered mesh formulation, considers variable hydraulic conductivity and specific storage, and has automatic time-step control and mesh generation. The geometry and flux-boundary condition in the well-intake section is fully considered, and the interface between a cutoff wall and natural soil formation is modeled as a constant head-boundary condition. Also, a filter cake can be simulated in . is verified by comparing results with an analytical solution for a partially penetrating well in aquifers and another numerical code, MODFLOW-96, for a vertical cutoff wall. The program provides a new analytic tool for analyzing slug-test results from vertical cutoff walls and is unique in the ability to simulate variable hydraulic properties, which can be particularly important for highly compressible materials such as soil–bentonite backfill in a cutoff wall.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The writer would like to thank Dr. J. Butler of the Kansas Geological Survey for providing the computer code implementing the KGS method to compare our numerical program. Professor D. E. Daniel provided useful guidance and financial support throughout the course of this study.
References
Britton, J. P., Filz, G. M., and Little, J. C. (2002). “Shape factors for single-well tests in soil-bentonite cutoff walls.” Proc. 4th Int. Congress on Environmental Geotechnics, ISSMGE, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil, 639–644.
Bouwer, H. (1989). “The Bouwer and rice slug test—An update.” Ground Water, 27(3), 304–309.
Bouwer, H., and Rice, R. C. (1976). “A slug test for determining hydraulic conductivity of unconfined aquifer with completely or partially penetrating wells.” Water Resour. Res., 12(3), 423–428.
Brown, D. L., and Narasimhan, T. N. (1995). “An evaluation of the Bouwer and Rice method of slug test analysis.” Water Resour. Res., 31(5), 1239–1246.
Butler, J. J. (1996). “Slug tests in situ characterization: Some practical consideration.” Environ. Geosci., 3(2), 154–163.
Butler, J. J. (1998). The Design, performance, and analysis of slug tests, Lewis, Boca Raton, Fla.
Choi, H. (2002). “Analysis of slug tests to determine hydraulic conductivity of vertical cutoff walls.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Ill.
Choi, H., and Daniel, D. E. (2006a). “Slug test analysis in vertical cutoff walls. I: Analysis methods.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 132(4), 429–438.
Choi, H., and Daniel, D. E. (2006b). “Slug test analysis in vertical cutoff walls. II: Applications.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 132(4), 439–447.
Cooper, H. H., Bredehoeft, J. D., and Papadopulos, I. S. (1967). “Response of a finite-diameter well to an instantaneous charge of water.” Water Resour. Res., 3(1), 263–269.
Demir, Z. (1990). “Some contribution to Hvorslev tests, slug-tests, and drill-stem tests.” MS thesis, Univ. of California at Berkeley, Calif.
Demir, Z., and Narasimhan, T. N. (1994). “Improved interpretation of Hvorslev tests.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 120(4), 477–494.
EMCON. (1995). “Slurry walls postconstruction performance evaluation.” M-11/15, M-17/21, and M-26/E-29 West Contra Costa Sanitary Landfill, Richmond, Calif.
Evans, J. C., and Cooley, B. (1993). “Slurry wall performance.” Progress in geotechnical engineering, Hershey, Pa.
Filz, G. M., Boyer, R. D., and Davidson, R. R. (1991). “Bentonite-water slurry rheology and cutoff wall trench stability.” Proc., In Situ Remediation of the Government, Geotechnical Special Publication, No. 71, Minneapolis, 139–153.
Filz, G. M., Henry, L. B., Heslin, G. M., and Davidson, R. R. (2001). “Determining hydraulic conductivity of soil-bentonite using the API filter press.” Geotech. Test. J., 24(1), 61–71.
Harbaugh, A. W., and McDonald, M. G. (1996). “Programmer’s documentation for MODFLOW-96; an updated U.S. geological survey modular finite-difference groundwater flow model.” U.S. Geological Survey, Open-File Rep. Nos. 96-485 and 486, USGS, Reston, Va.
Henry, L. B., Filz, G. M., and Davidson, R. R. (1998). “Formation and properties of bentonite filter cakes.” Proc., Geo-Congress 98, Geotechnical Special Publication, No. 78, Boston, Mass., 69–88.
Hvorslev, M. J. (1951). “Time lag and soil permeability in groundwater observation,” Bulletin No. 36, Waterways Experiment Station, U.S. Army, Corps of Engineering, Vicksburg, Miss.
Hyder, Z. (1994). “Analysis of slug tests in partially penetrating wells.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Kansas, Lawrence, Kan.
Hyder, Z., Butler, J. J., McElwee, C. D., and Liu, W. (1994). “Slug tests in partially penetrating well.” Water Resour. Res., 30(11), 2945–2957.
Lambe, T. W., and Whitman, R. V. (1979). Soil mechanics, SI version, Wiley, N.Y.
McCandlesss, R. M., and Bodocsi, A. (1987). “Investigation of slurry cutoff wall design and construction methods for containing hazardous wastes.” Rep. No. EPA-600-S2-87/063, Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati.
McDonald, M. G., and Harbaugh, A. W. (1988). “A modular three-dimensional finite-difference groundwater flow model.” Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations of the U.S. Geological Survey, Open-File Rep. No. 83-875, USGS, Reston, Va.
Mesri, G., and Cepeda-Diaz, A. F. (1986). “Permeability of shales.” Proc. 8th Panamerican Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Columbia, 269–274.
Mesri, G., and Choi, Y. K. (1985). “Settlement analysis of embankments on soft clays.” J. Geotech. Engrg., 111(4), 441–464.
Mesri, G., Feng, T. W., Ali, S., and Hayat, T. M. (1994). “Permeability characteristics of soft clays.” Proc. 13th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, ISSMGE, New Delhi, India, 187–192.
Mesri, G., and Rokhsar, A. (1974). “Theory of consolidation for clays.” J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., l00(8), 889–904.
Papadopulos, S. S., Bredehoeft, J. D., and Cooper, H. H. (1973). “On the analysis of slug test data.” Water Resour. Res., 9(4), 1087–1089.
Pinder, G. F. (1970). “An iterative digital model for aquifer evaluation.” U.S. Geological Survey, Open-file Rep. No. 43
Routt, K. R., and Crawford, P. B. (1973). “A new and fast method for solving large numbers of reservoir simulation equations.” Proc. 3rd Numerical Simulation of Reservoir Performance Symp., Society of Petroleum Engineering, AIMMPE, Houston, Tex.
Rumer, R. K., and Mitchell, J. K. (1995). Assessment of barrier containment technologies, U.S. DOE, U.S. EPA, and DuPont Company.
Tavenas, F., Jean, P., Leblond, P., and Leroueil, S. (1983). “The permeability of natural soft clays. Part II: Permeability characteristics.” Can. Geotech. J., 20, 645–660.
Teeter, R. M., and Clemence, S. P. (1986). “In-place permeability measurement of slurry trench cutoff wall.” Proc., In Situ’ 86, Use of In Situ Tests in Geotechnical Engineering, Geotechnical Special Publication No. 6, Blacksburg, Va., 1049–1061.
Terzaghi, K. (1945). “Stability and stiffness of cellular cofferdams.” Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 110, 1083–1119.
Yang, D. S., Luscher, U., Kimoto, I., and Takeshima, S. (1993). “SMW wall for seepage control in levee reconstruction.” Proc. 3th Int. Conf. Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering, St. Louis, Mo., 487–492.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2007 ASCE.
History
Received: Oct 7, 2003
Accepted: Aug 11, 2006
Published online: Oct 1, 2007
Published in print: Oct 2007
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.