Allowable Bearing Pressures of Bridge Sills on GRS Abutments with Flexible Facing
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 132, Issue 7
Abstract
Compared to geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) retaining walls, GRS abutment walls are generally subjected to much greater intensity surface loads that are fairly close to the wall face. A major issue with the design of GRS abutments is the allowable bearing pressure of the bridge sill on the abutments. The allowable bearing pressure of a bridge sill over reinforced soil retaining walls has been limited to in the current NHI and Demo 82 design guidelines. A study was undertaken to investigate the allowable bearing pressures of bridge sills over GRS abutments with flexible facing. The study was conducted by the finite element method of analysis. The capability of the finite element computer code for analyzing the performance of GRS bridge abutments with modular block facing has been evaluated extensively prior to this study. A series of finite element analyses were carried out to examine the effect of sill type, sill width, soil stiffness/strength, reinforcement spacing, and foundation stiffness on the load-carrying capacity of GRS abutment sills. Based on the results of the analytical study, allowable bearing pressures of GRS abutments were determined based on two performance criteria: A limiting displacement criterion and a limiting shear strain criterion, as well as the writers’ experiences with GRS walls and abutments. In addition, a recommended design procedure for determining the allowable bearing pressure is provided.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This study is part of a National Cooperative Highway Research Project (NCHRP) Study 12-59 to develop guidelines for design and construction of flexible facing GRS bridge-supporting structures. The writers wish to acknowledge the financial support of the NCHRP. They also wish to express gratitude to Bob Barrett of Soil Nail Launchers, Inc. and Michael Adams of the Federal Highway Administration for their assistance, encouragement, and advice throughout this study.
References
Abu-Hejleh, N., Wang, T., and Zornberg, J. G. (2000). “Performance of geosynthetic-reinforced walls supporting bridge and approaching roadway structures.” Geotechnical Special Publication No. 103, Proc., Advances in Transportation and Geoenvironmental Systems using Geosynthetics, ASCE, Reston, Va., 218–243.
Abu-Hejleh, N., Zornberg, J. G., Wang, T., and Watcharamonthein, J. (2002). “Monitored displacements of unique geosynthetic-reinforced soil bridge abtuments.” Geosynthet. Int., 9(1), 71–95.
Adams, M. T. (1997). “Performance of a prestrained geosynthetic reinforced soil bridge pier.” Mechanically stabilized backfill, J. T. H. Wu, ed., Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 35–53.
Adams, M. T., and Collin, J. G. (1997). “Large model spread footing load tests on geosynthetic reinforced soil foundations.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 123(1), 66–72.
Aksharadananda, T., and Wu, J. T. H. (2001). “Strength parameters of backfills for design and construction of retaining walls.” Rep. 2001-07, Colorado Department of Transportation, Denver.
Bathurst, R. J., and Alfaro, M. C. (1997). “Review of seismic design, analysis and performance of geosynthetic reinforced walls, slopes and embankments.” Earth reinforcement, Ochiai, Yasufuku, and Omine, eds., Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 887–918.
Bozozuk, M. (1978). “Bridge foundations move.” Transportation Research Record 678, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 17–21.
Briaud, J. L., and Gibbens, R. M. (1994). Predicted and measured behavior of five spread footings on sand. ASCE, New York.
Elias, V., and Christopher, B. R. (1996). “Mechanically stabilized earth walls and reinforced soil slopes, design and construction guidelines.” FHWA-SA-96-071, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
Elias, V., Christopher, B. R., and Berg, R. R. (2001). “Mechanically stabilized earth walls and reinforced soil slopes design and construction guidelines.” National Highway Institute Course No. 132042, FHWA NHI-00-043, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
Gotteland, P., Gourc, J. P., and Villard, P. (1997). “Geosynthetics reinforced structures as bridge abutments: Full scale experimentation and comparison with modelisations.” Mechanically stabilized backfill, J. T. H. Wu, ed., Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 25–34.
Grover, R. A. (1978). “Movements of bridge abutments and settlements of approach slabs in Ohio.” Transportation Research Record 678, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 12–17.
Holtz, R. D., Christopher, B. R., and Berg, R. R. (1997). Geosynthetic engineering, BiTech, B.C., Canada.
Ketchart, K., and Wu, J. T. H. (1996). “Long-term performance tests of soil-geosynthetic composites.” Rep. CDOT-CTI-96-1, Colorado Dept. of Transportation, Denver.
Ketchart, K., and Wu, J. T. H. (2002). “A modified soil-geosynthetic ineractive performance test for evaluating deformation behavior of GRS structures.” Geotech. Test. J., 25(4), 405–413.
Lee, K. Z. Z., and Wu, J. T. H. (2004). “A synthesis of case histories on GRS bridge-supporting structures with flexible facing.” Geotext. Geomembr., 22(4), 181–204.
Mannsbart, G., and Kropik, O. (1996). “Nonwoven geotextile used for temporary reinforcement of a retaining structure under a railroad track.” Geosynthetics: Applications, design and construction, DeGroot, Hoedt, and Termaat, eds., Balkema, Roterdam, The Netherlands, 121–124.
Tateyama, M., Murata, O., Watanabe, K., and Tatsuoka, F. (1994). “Geosynthetic-reinforced retaining walls for bullet train yard in Nagoya.” Recent case histories of permanent geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining wall, Tatsuoka and Leshchinsky, eds., Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 141–150.
Tatsuoka, F., Uchimura, T., Tateyama, M., and Koseki, J. (1997). “Geosynthetic-reinforcement soil retaining walls as important permanent structures.” Mechanically stabilized backfill, J. T. H. Wu, ed., Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 3–24.
Wahls, H. E. (1990). “Design and construction of bridge approaches.” National Cooperative Highway Research Program Synthesis of Highway Practice 159, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
Walkinshaw, J. L. (1978). “Survey of bridge movements in the Western United States.” Transportation Research Record 678, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 6–11.
Won, G. W., Hull, T., and De Ambrosis, L. (1996). “Performance of a geosynthetic segmental block wall structure to support bridge abutments.” Earth reinforcement, Vol. 1, Ochiai, Yasufuku, and Omine, eds., Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 543–548.
Wong, K. S., and Duncan, J. M. (1974). “Hyperbolic stress–strain parameters for nonlinear finite element analysis of stresses and movements in soil masses.” Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif.
Wu, J. T. H. (1994). “Design and construction of low cost retaining walls: The next generation in technology.” Rep. CTI-UCD-1-94, Colorado Transportation Institute, Denver.
Wu, J. T. H., Ketchart, K., and Adams, M. T. (2001). “GRS bridge piers and abutments.” Rep. FHWA-RD-00-038, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C.
Wu, J. T. H., Lee, K. Z. Z., Helwany, S. B., and Ketchart, K. (2006). “Design and construction guidelines for GRS bridge abutments with a flexible facing.” Rep. 556, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, D.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2006 ASCE.
History
Received: Aug 1, 2005
Accepted: Jan 4, 2006
Published online: Jul 1, 2006
Published in print: Jul 2006
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.