Field Evaluation of Crushed Glass–Dredged Material Blends
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 132, Issue 5
Abstract
Based on the laboratory results reported in a companion paper, three crushed glass–dredged material (CG–DM) blends were prepared and evaluated in the field to explore the feasibility of using CG–DM blends in general, embankment and structural fill applications. A trailer-mounted pugmill successfully prepared , , and CG–DM blends (dry weight percent CG content reported first) within a tolerance of dry % by weight of the targeted percentages. Blending criteria were routinely met at pugmill throughputs up to . The constructed CG–DM embankment was compacted to a minimum of 90% modified Proctor compaction, whereas the and CG–DM embankments were constructed to a minimum of 95% modified Proctor compaction. Twenty to 80% CG addition to DM resulted in increases in field dry densities above 100% DM, densities not achievable with other DM stabilization techniques such as Portland cement, fly ash, and/or lime (PC/FA/lime) addition. CG substantially improved the workability of DM allowing construction with conventional equipment and three person crew while achieving very consistent and reproducible results during a timeline of frequent and heavy precipitation events. The , , and CG–DM embankments were characterized by average cone tip resistances on the order of 1.0, 1.5, and , respectively. An environmental evaluation of 100% CG, DM and CG–DM blend samples coupled with an economic analysis of a scaled-up commercial application illustrated that the CG–DM blending approach is potentially more cost effective than PC/FA/lime stabilization approaches. These features of CG–DM blending make the process attractive for use in urban and industrial settings.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The USACE-Philadelphia District provided the physical space, dredged material and funds to support this research under Contract No. UNSPECIFIEDDACW61-03-C-0021 with Apex Environmental Inc. (Malvern, Pa.). Partnering funds were provided by the Strategic Environmental Management Program Office of the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation under PennDOT Contract No. UNSPECIFIED440128, Assignment 59A via Apex. Thomas W. Groff (USACE) and Kenneth J. Thornton (PennDOT) are thanked for their support and involvement. Additional financial support for this research was provided by the National Science Foundation under Grant Nos. NSFCMS-0134370 and NSFCMS-0238614. Blue Mountain Recycling LLC (Philadelphia) provided the crushed glass for this study. Clean Earth Dredging Technologies Incorporated (Hatboro, Pa.) provided all necessary manpower, equipment, and supplies to manufacture the CG–DM blends and to construct the trial embankments. Rocksroy Bailey, Michael E. Oates, and Michael D. Moreland of Apex provided onsite quality assurance support. CPT Testing was completed by ConeTec (West Berlin, N.J.). Environmental tests were completed by Great Lakes Analytical Laboratories (King of Prussia, Pa.). Michael M. Meloy, Esquire, of Manko, Gold, Katcher, Fox LLP (Bala Cynwyd, Pa.) is thanked for his constructive input to the environmental quality section of this paper. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the writer(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the project sponsors.
References
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). (1995). “Standard test method for performing electronic friction cone and piezocone penetration testing of soils.” ASTM D5778-95, West Conshohocken, Pa.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). (1996). “Standard test method for density of soil and soil-aggregate in place by nuclear methods (shallow depth).” ASTM D2922-96, West Conshohocken, Pa.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). (1998). “Standard test method for particle size analysis of soils.” ASTM D422-63 (Re-approved 1998), West Conshohocken, Pa.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). (2000a). “Standard test method for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using modified effort.” ASTM D1557-00, West Conshohocken, Pa.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). (2000b). “Standard test method for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using standard effort.” ASTM D698-00, West Conshohocken, Pa.
Delaware Department of Transportation (DelDOT). (2001). “Standard specifications for road and bridge construction.” Dover, De.
Duffield Associates. (2001). “Subsurface investigation: Wilmington Harbor North, dredged material confined disposal facility.” Contract No. DACW61-98-D-008, Task No. 27, Prepared for US Corps of Engineers-Philadelphia District, Philadelphia.
Grubb, D. G., Gallagher, P. M., Wartman, J., Carnivale, M., III, and Liu, Y. (2006). “Laboratory evaluation of crushed glass–dredged material blends.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 132(5), 562-576.
Maher, A. (2001). “Final geotechnical report: OENJ/NJDOT roadway embankment pilot project at parcel G of the OENJ Redevelopment Site, Elizabeth, Union County, New Jersey.” Rep. Prepared for NJ Maritime Resources, NJ Department of Transportation, Sadat Associates and OENJ Corp.
New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJDOT). (2001). “Standard specifications for road and bridge construction.” Trenton, N.J.
PA State Climatologist (2004). “Hourly observations of PHL Weather Station, June 2004.” The Pennsylvania State Climatologist, College of Earth and Mineral Sciences, The Pennsylvania State Univ., State College, Pa. ⟨http://pasc.met.psu.edu/PA_Climatologist/phl/phljunh04.html⟩.
Pennsylvania Dept. of Environmental Protection (PADEP). (1995). “Land recycling and environmental remediation standards act, Act 2 of 1995.” Harrisburg, Pa.
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP). (2003). “Bureau of Waste Management, Special Conditions General Permit WMGR083.” Harrisburg, Pa.
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP).(2004). “Management of Fill.” Document No. 258-2182-77,Bureau of Land Recycling and Waste Management, Harrisburg, Pa.http://164.156.71.80/WXOD.aspx?fs=2087d8407c0e0000800005da000005da&ft=1⟩.
Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT). (1995). “Pennsylvania Test Method No. 1: Method of test for probability sampling.” Field test manual, Publication 19/1995, Harrisburg, Pa.
Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT). (2004). “Specification.” Publication 408/2003 (Change 2, Effective 10/1/04), Harrisburg, Pa.
Randrup, T. B., and Lichter, J. M. (2001). “Measuring soil compaction on construction sites: A review of surface nuclear gauges and penetrometers.” J. Arboriculture, 27(3), 109–117.
Robertson, P. K., and Campanella, R. G. (1983). “Interpretation of cone penetrometer tests, Part I: Sand.” Can. Geotech. J., 20(4), 718–733.
Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC). (2002). “Geotechnical investigation report, Fort Mifflin Disposal Area, Cells B and C, Philadelphia, PA.” Contract No. DACW61-00-D-007, Task No. 14, Rep. Prepared for: US Corps of Engineers-Philadelphia District, Philadelphia, Pa, Exton, Pa.
Troxler Electronic Laboratories, Inc. (2001). “Application brief: The importance of the application of necessary moisture correction factors to field compaction tests made with nuclear moisture gauges.” Research Triangle Park, N.C.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). (2005). “Navigation data center: FY 2004 Analysis of dredging costs.” CEIWR-NA, Alexandria, Va ⟨http://www.iwr.usace.army.mil/ndc/dredge/dredge.htm⟩ (revised 5/26/2005).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (1983). “Methods for chemical analysis of water and wastes.” EPA-600/4/79-020, Cincinnati.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (1991). “Synthetic precipitation leaching procedure (SPLP).” Federal Register, 1312(No. 55; March 29), 11798, Washington, DC.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (1998). Test methods for evaluating solid wastes, Physical/chemical methods, 3rd Ed., Washington, D.C.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (1999a). “National primary drinking water standards.” EPA-F-94-001, Washington, D.C.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (1999b). “Toxicity characteristic.” Code of Federal Regulations, 40CFR261.24.
Wartman, J., Grubb, D. G., and Nasim, A. S. M. (2004). “Select engineering characteristics of crushed glass.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 16(6), 526–539.
Weston Inc. (2002). “Dredged material characterization report, Fort Mifflin Confined Disposal Facility—Area A, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.” Rep. Prepared for Sunoco, Inc., Philadelphia, Pa, West Chester, Pa.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2006 ASCE.
History
Received: Mar 30, 2005
Accepted: Aug 29, 2005
Published online: May 1, 2006
Published in print: May 2006
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.