Determination of Atterberg Limits: Uncertainty and Implications
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYThis article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYPublication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 132, Issue 3
Abstract
Arthur Casagrande made one of the most important contributions to Geotechnical Engineering; ordering and presenting clearly the existing differences between objectives for civil engineering soil classification and soil classification schemes intended for other purposes. However, more than 50 years after the Unified System of Soil Classification (USSC) was proposed, one of the main ideas expressed by Casagrande: “the plasticity chart representation of the plasticity parameters in different soil moistures, belonging to a common geological origin, is a straight line, parallel to the A line,” has received little scrutiny. The main purpose of this technical note is to begin a revision of Casagrande’s proposal under a probabilistic approach, suggesting some modifications to the application of the plasticity chart. Regression analysis is proposed as a valid technique to express the linear behavior of the Atterberg limits for a given soil. The problem considering plasticity index as a probabilistic variable is exposed demonstrating that the correct representation of the plasticity chart is in terms of liquid and plastic limits. Data from the Libertad–Dolores clays formations from Uruguay are presented, demonstrating the application of the proposed changes.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). (1984). “Standard test methods for liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of soils.” D4318, Philadelphia, 573–583.
Baghery, S. (1980). “Probabilités et statistiques en mécanique des sols. Analyse probabiliste de la stabilité des tassements de remblais sur sols compressibles.” PhD thesis, Ecole Nationale des Ponts et Chaussées, Paris.
Bossi, J. et al. (1998). Memoria explicativa de la carta geológica del Uruguay a escala 1:500.000.
Canavos G. C. (1988). Applied probability and statistical methods, McGraw–Hill, New York.
Casagrande A. (1947). “Classification and identification of soils.” Proc. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 901–991.
Costet, J., and Sanglerat, G. (1975). Curso práctico de mecánica de suelos, Omega, Barcelona, Spain.
Dysli, M. (1976). “Gazoduc suisse romand. Aspects géologiques et géotechniques du tracé souslacustre.” Communication du Laboratoire de Géotechnique No. 37, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Géotechnique. (1992). “Eighth Geotechnique Symp. in print. Bothkenar soft clay test site: Characterization and lessons learned.” Proc. Geotechnique 8th, Symp., XLII(2) .
Harr, M. E. (1997). Reliability based design on civil engineering, Dover, New York.
Magnan, J. P. (1982). Les méthodes statistiques et probabilistes en mécanique des sols, Presses de l’ École Nationale des Ponts et Chausées, France.
Schultze, E. (1972). “Frequency distributions and correlation of soil properties.” Proc. 1st ICASP, Hong Kong, 371–388.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2005 ASCE.
History
Received: Jan 9, 2004
Accepted: Sep 9, 2005
Published online: Mar 1, 2006
Published in print: Mar 2006
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.