TECHNICAL PAPERS
Nov 1, 2006

General Analytical Framework for Design of Flexible Reinforced Earth Structures

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 132, Issue 11

Abstract

Current design methods divide reinforced earth structures into walls and slopes by using an arbitrary face inclination of 70° as the boundary. The required maximum strength of reinforcement computed for reinforced walls are significantly higher than that computed for reinforced slopes even if the inclination is practically the same. Presented is a general analytical framework for design of flexible reinforced earth structures regardless of the slope face inclination. In fact, the framework is consistent for any structural geometry and any applicable slope stability analysis although, for demonstration purposes, the simple Culmann formulation is utilized for simple geometry with zero batter. Using an adequate slope stability formulation, the required tensile resistance of reinforcement for a given layout is calculated so as to produce the same prescribed factor of safety anywhere within the reinforced zone. That is, using the design shear strength of the soil, the required reinforcement resistance along each layer is computed to fully mobilize this shear strength for all possible slip surfaces. That is, a baseline solution is produced for an ideal long-term strength of reinforcement at any location. Consequently, the required strength of the connection between each reinforcement layer and the facing unit can also be determined. This connection strength, however, assumes small facing units with negligibly small shear and moment resistance. Parametric study is conducted to demonstrate the reasonableness of the presented framework. It is shown that the required tensile resistance and connection strength depend on factors such as: reinforcement length; intermediate reinforcement; percent coverage; and quality of fill. When compared with the current AASHTO design for walls, the required maximum long-term strength of the reinforcement as well as the required connection strength in the proposed approach are substantially smaller.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Allen, T. M., and Bathurst, R. J. (2001). “Prediction of soil reinforcement loads in mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls.” Rep. No. WA-RD- 522.1, Washington State Department of Transportation, Seattle.
Allen, T. M., Bathurst, R. J., Holtz, R. D., Walters, D., and Lee, W. F. (2003). “A new working stress method for prediction of reinforcement loads in geosynthetic walls.” Can. Geotech. J., 40(5), 976–994.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (2002). Standard specifications for highway bridges, Washington, D.C.
Baker, R., and Klein, Y. (2004a). “An integrated limiting equilibrium approach for design of reinforced soil retaining structures: Part I—Formulation.” Geotext. Geomembr., 22(3), 119–150.
Baker, R., and Klein, Y. (2004b). “An integrated limiting equilibrium approach for design of reinforced soil retaining structures: Part II—Design examples.” Geotext. Geomembr., 22(3), 151–177.
Baker, R., and Leshchinsky, D. (2001). “Spatial distributions of safety factors.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 127(2), 135–145.
British Standard Institute (BSI). (1995). “Code practice for strengthened/reinforced soils and other fills.” BS 8006.
Collin, J. G. (1997). “SRW connection strength: How much is enough?” Geotechnical Fabrics Rep., Industrial Fabrics Association International, Minn., 32–35.
Culmann, K. (1866). “Die graphische statik.” Theorie der stutz und futtermauern, Meyer und Zeller, Zurich, Switzerland.
Elias, V., Christopher, B. R., and Berg, R. (2001). “Mechanically stabilized earth walls and reinforced soil slopes: Design and construction guidelines.” Publication No. FHWA-NHI-00-043, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
Fannin, R. J., and Hermann, S. (1990). “Performance data for a sloped reinforced soil wall.” Can. Geotech. J., 27(5), 676–686.
Han, J., and Leshchinsky, D. (2004). “Limit equilibrium and continuum mechanics-based numerical methods for analyzing stability of MSE walls.” Proc., 17th Engineering Mechanics Conf., ASCE, Newark, Del.
Jewell, R. A. (1990). “Revised design charts for steep reinforced slopes.” Proc., Conf. Reinforced Embankments, Theory and Practice in the British Isles, Cambridge University, Cambridge, U.K., D. A. Shercliff, ed., Thomas Telford, London, 1–30.
Leshchinsky, D. (1992). “Issues in geosynthetic-reinforced soil.” Keynote paper, Proc., Int. Symp. Earth Reinforcement Practice, Vol. 2, Kyushu, Japan, Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 871–897.
Leshchinsky, D. (1999). “Stability of geosynthetic reinforced steep slopes.” Keynote paper, Int. Conf. on Slope Stability Engineering, IS-Shikoku, Japan, Yagi, Yamagami, Jiang, eds., Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 49–66.
Leshchinsky, D., and Boedeker, R. H. (1989). “Geosynthetic reinforced soil structures.” J. Geotech. Engrg., 115(10), 1459–1478.
Leshchinsky, D., and Han, J. (2004). “Geosynthetic reinforced multitiered walls.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 130(12), 1225–1235.
Leshchinsky, D., Ling, H. I., and Hanks, G. (1995). “Unified design approach to geosynthetic reinforced slopes and segmental walls.” Geosynthet. Int., 2(4), 845–881.
Leshchinsky, D., and Perry, E. B., (1987). “A design procedure for geotextile-reinforced walls.” Proc., Geosynthetics ’87, IFAI, Industrial Fabric Association International, 95–107.
Leshchinsky, D., and Volk, J. C. (1985). “Stability charts for geotextile reinforced walls.” Transportation Research Record 1031, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 5–16.
Ling, H. I., Mohri, Y., Leshchinsky, D., Burke, C., Matsushima, K., and Liu, H. (2005). “Large-scale shaking table tests on modular-block reinforced soil retaining walls.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 131(4), 465–476.
National Concrete Masonry Association (NCMA). (1997). Design manual for segmental retaining walls, Herndon, Va.
Rowe, R. K., and Ho, S. K. (1992). “A review of the behavior of reinforced walls.” Keynote paper, Proc., Int. Symp. on Earth Reinforcement Practice, Vol. 2, Kyushu, Japan, Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 801–830.
Schmertmann, G. R., Chouery-Curtis, V. E., Johnson, R. D., and Bonaparte, R. (1987). “Design charts for geogrid-reinforced soil slopes.” Proc., Geosynthetics ’87 Conf., IFAI, Industrial Fabric Association International, New Orleans, 108–120.
Zornberg, J. G., Sitar, N., and Mitchell, J. K. (1998a). “Limit equilibrium as basis for design of geosynthetic reinforced slopes,” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 124(8), 684–698.
Zornberg, J. G., Sitar, N., and Mitchell, J. K. (1998b). “Performance of geosynthetic reinforced slopes at failure.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 124(8), 670–683.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 132Issue 11November 2006
Pages: 1427 - 1435

History

Received: Mar 21, 2005
Accepted: May 22, 2006
Published online: Nov 1, 2006
Published in print: Nov 2006

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jie Han
P.E.
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Kansas, 2150 Learned Hall, 1530 W. 15th St., Lawrence, KS 66045-7609 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Dov Leshchinsky
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share