Discriminant Model for Evaluating Soil Liquefaction Potential Using Cone Penetration Test Data
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYThis article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYPublication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 130, Issue 12
Abstract
Statistical analysis using a discriminant model is applied to 399 cone penetration test (CPT) data sets of both liquefaction and nonliquefaction cases, including 174 sets from the Chi-Chi earthquake in Taiwan and 225 sets of synthesized data. The discriminant model employed is a multivariate statistical method. In situ testing results of cone tip resistance and sleeve friction ratio are adopted as the major parameters for analyses. A model for evaluating liquefaction potential using CPT- data is also established in this study, which allows calculated results to be compared with the empirical curves.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Anderson, T.W. ( 1957). “Classification of observations.” An introduction to multivariate statistical analysis, Wiley, New York, 126–153.
2.
Cheng-Kung University (CKU) (1999). “Study of ground settlement of reclaimed land at industrial areas along the coast in Chang-Hua county.” Final Rep. Tainan, Taiwan (in Chinese).
3.
Christian, J. T., and Swiger, W. F. (1975). “Statistics of liquefaction and SPT results.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 101(11), 1135–1150.
4.
Chu, B.L., Hsu, S.C., Lai, S.Y., and Chang, Y.M. ( 2000). “Failures associated with liquefaction at Wufeng during Chi-Chi earthquake.” Proc., Int. Workshop on Annual Commemoration of the Chi-Chi Earthquake, Taipei, Republic of China, Vol. III, 46–57.
5.
Idriss, I.M. ( 1999). “An update of the Seed-Idriss simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential.” Proc., TRB Workshop on New Approaches to Liquefaction Analysis, FHWA-RD-99-165, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
6.
Ishihara, K. ( 1985). “Stability of natural deposits during earthquakes.” State-of-the-Art Reports, XI Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, San Francisco.
7.
Juang, C. H., Chen, C. J., Tang, W. H., and Rosowsky, D. V. (2000). “CPT-based liquefaction analysis, Part 1: Determination of limit state function.” Geotechnique, 50(5), 583–592.
8.
Kleinbaum, D.G., Kupper, L.L., and Muller, K.E. ( 1988). “Two-group discriminant analysis.” Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods, Pws-Kent, Boston, 560–594.
9.
Lai, S. Y. (1990). “Discriminant models for evaluating soil liquefaction potential using SPT data.” J. Chin. Inst. Civil Hydraul. Eng., 2(4), 301–31 (in Chinese).
10.
Lai, S.Y., and Hsieh, M.J. ( 1999). “Preliminary investigation and study of liquefaction damages of Berths 1 to 4A at Taichung harbor during the 921 earthquake.” Special Issue 172, Center of Harbor and Marine Technology, Republic of China (in Chinese).
11.
Lai, S. Y., Lee, F. B., and Hsieh, M. J. (1990). “Logistic regression models for evaluating soil liquefaction probability by CPT.” J. Civil Hydraulic Engineering, Taipei, Taiwan, 16(4), 35–48 (in Chinese).
12.
Liao, S. S. C., Veneziano, D., and Whitman, R. V. (1988). “Regression models for evaluating liquefaction probability.” J. Geotech. Eng., 114(4), 389–411.
13.
Liao, S. S. C., and Whitman, R. V. (1986). “Overburden correction factors for SPT in sand.” J. Geotech. Eng., 112(3), 373–377.
14.
Lin, P.S., Lai, S.Y., Lin, S.Y., and Hseih, C.C. ( 2000). “Liquefaction potential assessment on Chi-Chi earthquake in Nantou, Taiwan.” Proc., Int. Workshop on Annual Commemoration of Chi-Chi Earthquake, Taipei, Taiwan, Vol. III, 83–94.
15.
Mardia, K.V., Kent, J.T., and Bibby, J.M. ( 1979). “Discriminant analysis.” Multivariate analysis, Academic, London, 300–332.
16.
Moh and Associates (MAA). (2000). “Soil liquefaction evaluation and mitigation study, Phase 1 (Yuenlin, Dachun, and Shehtou Townships).” Final Rep. to the National Science Council (NSC) of the Republic of China, Taipei, Taiwan, 975–978 (in Chinese).
17.
Murtagh, F., and Heck, A. ( 1987). “Discriminant analysis.” Multivariate data analysis, Reidel, Boston, 111–154.
18.
Olsen, R.S. ( 1997). “Cyclic liquefaction based on the cone penetrometer test.” Proc., NCEER Workshop on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soil, T. L. Youd and I. M. Idriss, eds., NCEER-97-0022.
19.
Robertson, P. K., and Campanella, R. G. (1985). “Liquefaction potential of sands using the CPT.” J. Geotech. Eng., 111(3), 384–403.
20.
Robertson, P.K., and Wride, C.E. ( 1997). “Cyclic liquefaction and its evaluation based on SPT and CPT.” Proc., NCEER Workshop on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soil, T. L. Youd and I. M. Idriss, eds., NCEER-97-0022.
21.
Seed, H.B., and De Alba, P.M. ( 1986). “Use of SPT and CPT tests for evaluating the liquefaction resistance of sands.” Proc., In-Situ Test, ASCE, New York, 281–302.
22.
Seed, H. B., and Idriss, I. M. (1971). “Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., 97(9), 1249–1273.
23.
Seed, H. B., Idriss, I. M., and Arango, I. (1983). “Evaluation of liquefaction potential using field performance data.” J. Geotech. Eng., 109(3), 458–482.
24.
Shibata, T., and Teparaksa, W. (1988). “Evaluation of liquefaction potentials of soil using cone penetration tests.” Soils Found., 28(2), 49–60.
25.
Stark, T. D., and Olson, S. M. (1995). “Liquefaction resistance using CPT and field case histories.” J. Geotech. Eng., 121(12), 856–869.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 ASCE.
History
Published online: Nov 15, 2004
Published in print: Dec 2004
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.