Foundation Isolation for Seismic Protection Using a Smooth Synthetic Liner
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYPublication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 130, Issue 11
Abstract
Smooth synthetic materials placed underneath foundations of structures can provide seismic protection by absorbing energy through sliding. Cyclic and shaking table tests were conducted on a variety of synthetic interfaces to identify a suitable liner for use as foundation isolation. It was concluded that a high strength, nonwoven geotextile placed over an ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene, UHMWPE (geotextile/UHMWPE) constitutes a liner that is well suited for this application. The static friction coefficient of the interface (between the geotextile and the UHMWPE) is about 0.1. The dynamic coefficient is about 0.07 and is insensitive to changes in slip rate and normal stress. A single-story structural model with and without foundation isolation was tested using a shaker table. The results demonstrate the role of foundation isolation in substantially reducing the seismic shear forces in the model. Accompanying this reduction in shear forces are slip displacements along the isolation liner. Permanent slip (final location of the structure relative to its initial position) can be reduced through the use of a small restoring force that could be provided through passive soil resistance. Peak-to-peak slip (maximum slip during shaking) needs to be permitted for foundation isolation to be effective. The experimental and analytical research results demonstrate the technical feasibility of using a smooth synthetic liner in earthquake hazard mitigation.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
De, A., and Zimmie, T.F. ( 1997). “Factors influencing dynamic frictional behavior of geosynthetic interfaces.” Proc. IGS (International Geosynthetic Society) Geosynthetics’97, Long Beach, Calif., 837–849.
2.
Hushmand, B., and Martin, G.R. ( 1991). “Layered soil-synthetic liner base isolation system.” Final Report, NSF Small Business Innovation Research Program.
3.
Kadakal, U. ( 1999). “Geosynthetics in earthquake hazard mitigation.” PhD dissertation, Northeastern University, Boston.
4.
Kavazanjian, E., Hushmand, B., and Martin, G. ( 1991). “Frictional base isolation using layered soil-geosynthetic liner system.” Proc., ASCE, 3rd U.S. Conf. on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering, Los Angeles, 1140–1151.
5.
Kelly, J.M. ( 1997). Earthquake-resistant design with rubber, 2nd Ed., Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
6.
Lahlaf, A.M. ( 1991). “Dynamic interface shear strength properties between geomembranes and geotextiles.” PhD thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Northeastern University.
7.
Skinner, R.I., Robinson, W.H., and McVerry, G.H. ( 1993). An introduction to seismic isolation, Wiley, New York.
8.
Yegian, M. K., and Catan, M. (2004). “Soil isolation for seismic protection using a smooth synthetic liner,” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 130(11), 1131–1139.
9.
Yegian, M. K., and Lahlaf, A. M. (1992a). “Dynamic interface shear properties of geomembranes and geotextiles.” J. Geotech. Eng., 118(5), 760–779.
10.
Yegian, M.K., and Lahlaf, A.M. ( 1992b). “Geomembranes as base-isolation.” Geosynthetic Fabric Rep., September.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 ASCE.
History
Published online: Oct 15, 2004
Published in print: Nov 2004
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.