TECHNICAL PAPERS
Jul 1, 2000

Organizing and Evaluating Uncertainty in Geotechnical Engineering

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 126, Issue 7

Abstract

Probabilistic methods are potentially useful in four stages of a typical project: site characterization and evaluation, evaluation of designs, decision making, and construction control. In evaluation of projects, it can be useful to express risk numerically. When uncertainties can be quantified and model errors are understood, reliability theory may be used. Event-tree analysis can be a framework for effectively applying judgment concerning uncertainty. The use of quantified risk in decision making is limited by standards for acceptable risk; good communication with a client is essential. Unless clients or regulators are interested in quantifying risks as part of decision making, engineers will continue to rely on traditional methods. When risks are large and the costs of absolute safety are large, clients are interested in discussing risks. Issues concerning the adequacy of existing structures such as earth dams are stimulating interest in risk assessment, and there will be spin-off from developments in earthquake engineering. More and better examples of applications of probabilistic methods are needed.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
Baecher, G. B. ( 1979). “Analyzing exploration strategies.” Site characterization and exploration, C. H. Dowding, ed., American Society of Civil Engineers, New York.
2.
Benson, C. H., Zhai, H., and Rashad, S. (1994a). “Statistical sample size for construction of soil liners.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 120(10), 1704–1724.
3.
Benson, C. H., Zhai, H., and Wang, X. (1994b). “Estimating hydraulic conductivity of clay liners.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 120(2), 366–387.
4.
Bowles, D. S., Anderson, L. R., Glover, T. F., and Chauhan, S. S. (1998). “Portfolio risk assessment: A tool for dam safety risk management.” Proc., USCOLD Annu. Meeting, U.S. Committee on Large Dams, Denver.
5.
Bunce, C. M. ( 1994). “Risk analysis for rock fall on highways.” MS thesis, Dept. Civil Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Ala.
6.
Casagrande, A. (1965). “The role of `Calculated Risk' in earthwork and foundation engineering.”J. Soil Mech. and Found. Div., ASCE, 91(4), 1(4), 1–40.
7.
Cherubini, C., Garrasi, A., and Petrolla, C. (1992). “The reliability of an anchored sheet-pile wall embedded in cohesionless soil.” Can. Geotech. J., 29(3), 426–435.
8.
Christian, J. T., Ladd, C. C., and Baecher, G. B. (1994). “Reliability applied to slope stability analysis.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 120(12), 2180–2207.
9.
Einstein, H. H. (1988). “Landslide risk evaluation procedure.” Proc., 5th Int. Symp. on Landslides, C. Bonnard, ed., Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 1075–1090.
10.
Evans, S. G., and Hungr, O. (1993). “The assessment of rockfall hazard at the base of talus slopes.” Can. Geotech. J., 30(4), 620–636.
11.
Fell, R. (1994). “Landslide risk assessment and allowable risk.” Can. Geotech. J., 31(2), 261–272.
12.
Fenton, G. A., and Vanmarcke, E. H. ( 1991). “Spatial variation in liquefaction risk assessment.” Geotechnical Engineering Congr., Geotech. Spec. Publ. 27, ASCE, New York, 1, 595–607.
13.
Gilbert, R. B., and McGrath, T. C. ( 1996). “Seven guidelines for managing uncertainty in geoenvironmental design.” Uncertainty in the Geologic Environment, Geotech. Spec. Publ. 58, ASCE, New York, 774–796.
14.
Gilbert, R. B., and Tang, W. H. ( 1995). “Reliability-based design for waste containment systems.” Geoenvironment 2000, Geotech. Spec. Publ. 46, ASCE, New York, 499–513.
15.
Halim, I. S., and Tang, W. H. (1993). “Site exploration strategy for geologic anomaly characterization.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 119(2), 195–213.
16.
Johnson, N. M., and Dreiss, S. J. (1989). “Hydrostratigraphic interpretation using indicator geostatistics.” Water Resour. J., 25(12), 2501–2510.
17.
Kulhawy, F. (1996). “From Casagrande's “Calculated Risk” to reliability-based design in foundation engineering.” Civ. Engrg. Pract., BSCE, 11(2), 43–56.
18.
Lacasse, S., and Nadim, F. (1994). “Reliability issues and future challenges in geotechnical engineering for offshore structures.” Proc., 7th Int. Conf. on Behaviour of Offshore Struct., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.
19.
Liao, S. C., Veneziano, D., and Whitman, R. V. (1988). “Regression models for evaluating liquefaction probability.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 114(4), 389–411.
20.
“Limit states design on trial.” (1995). Geotechnical News, Mar., 10–13.
21.
Loertscher, T. W., and Youd, T. L. (1994). “Magnitude scaling factors for analysis of liquefaction.” Proc., 5th U.S.-Japan Workshop on Earthquake Resistant Design of Lifeline Facilities and Countermeasures against Liquefaction, Tech. Rep. NCEER-94-0026, National Ctr. for Earthquake Engineering Research, State Univ. of New York, Buffalo, N.Y., 703–715.
22.
Massmann, J., Freeze, R. A., Smith, L., Sterling, T., and James, B. (1991). “Hydrogeologic decision analysis: 2. Applications to ground water contamination.” Ground Water, 29(4), 536–548.
23.
Morgenstern, N. (1995). “Managing risk in geotechnical engineering.” Proc., 10th Pan American Conf. on Soil Mech. and Found. Engrg., Mexican Society of Soil Mechanics, Mexico City, Vol. 4, 102–126.
24.
Nadim, F., and Lacasse, S. (1992). “Probabilistic bearing capacity analysis of jack-up structures.” Can. Geotech. J., 31(4), 580–588.
25.
Nielsen, N., Hartford, D., and MacDonald, T. (1994). “Selection of tolerable risk criteria in dam safety decision making.” Proc., Can. Dam Safety Conf., BiTech Publishers, Vancouver, B.C.
26.
Nobre, M. M., and Sykes, J. F. (1992). “Application of Bayesian Kriging to subsurface characterization.” Can. Geotech. J., 29(4), 589–598.
27.
Poeter, E., and Townsend, P. (1990). “Multiple indicator conditional stochastic simulation of a section of an unconfined aquifer.” Proc., 5th Can./Am. Conf. on Hydrology, S. Bauch, ed., National Water Well Association, Dublin, Ohio, 159–188.
28.
Reid, S. G. (1989). Risk assessment research report R591, School of Civil and Mining Engineering, University of Sydney, Australia, 1–46.
29.
Roberds, W. J. (1990). “Methods for developing defensible subjective probability assessments.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1288, 183–190.
30.
Ronold, K. O., and Bjerager, P. (1992). “Model uncertainty representation in geotechnical reliability analyses.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 118(3), 363–376.
31.
Ronold, K. O., and Bysveen, S. (1992). “Probabilistic stability analysis for deep-water foundation.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 118(3), 394–405.
32.
Rowe, R. K., and Fraser, M. J. ( 1995). “Effect of uncertainty in the assessment of the potential impact of waste disposal facilities.” Geoenvironment 2000, Geotech. Spec. Publ. 46, ASCE, New York, 270–284.
33.
Simpson, B. (1992). “Partial factors of safety for design of retaining walls.” Geotechnique, 42(1), 131–136.
34.
Tang, W. H. (1979). “Probabilistic evaluation of penetration resistance.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 105(10), 1173–1191.
35.
Thompson, A. F. B., and Gelhar, L. W. (1990). “Numerical simulation of solute transport in three-dimensional, randomly heterogeneous porous media.” Water Resour. Res., 26(10), 2541–2562.
36.
Vanmarcke, E. H. (1977). “Reliability of earth slopes.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 103(11), 1227–1246.
37.
Vanmarcke, E. H. (1983). Random fields, analysis and synthesis, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
38.
Vick, S. G. ( 1992). “Risk in geotechnical practice.” Geotechnique and natural hazards, BiTech Publishers, Richmond, B.C., Canada, 41–62.
39.
Vick, S. G., and Bromwell, L. F. (1989). “Risk analysis for dam design in karst.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 115(6), 819–835.
40.
Vick, S. G., and Stewart, R. A. ( 1996). “Risk analysis in dam safety practice.” Uncertainty in the Geologic Environment, Geotech. Spec. Publ. 58, ASCE, New York, 586–603.
41.
Webb, E. K., and Anderson, M. P. (1996). “Simulation of preferential flow in three-dimensional, heterogeneous fields with realistic internal architecture.” Water Resour. Res., 32(3), 533–545.
42.
Whitman, R. V. (1984). “Evaluating calculated risk in geotechnical engineering.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 110(2), 145–188.
43.
Wu, T. H., Thayer, W. B., and Lin, S. S. (1975). “Stability of an embankment on clay.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 101(9), 913–932.
44.
Wu, T. H., Kjekstad, O., Lee, I. M., and Lacasse, S. (1989). “Reliability analysis of foundation stability for gravity platforms in the North Sea.” Can. Geotech. J., 26, 359–368.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 126Issue 7July 2000
Pages: 583 - 593

History

Received: Oct 29, 1997
Published online: Jul 1, 2000
Published in print: Jul 2000

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Robert V. Whitman
Prof. Emeritus, Massachusetts Inst. of Technology, Cambridge, MA.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share