Effect of Fines and Confining Stress on Undrained Shear Strength of Silty Sands
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 124, Issue 6
Abstract
A silty sand is considered as a delicate composite matrix containing a sand-grain-matrix and a silt-matrix. Large strain undrained shear strength (Sus) data in triaxial compression for a particular host sand mixed with different amounts of nonplastic fines are presented. Results indicate that the intergranular void ratio, es, which is the void ratio of the sand-grain-matrix [given by (e+fc)/(1 −fc), where fc is the silt content fraction by weight], plays an important role on Sus of silty sands. At the same void ratio, e, a silty sand shows low Sus compared to that of the host sand. However, when compared at the same es, provided that it is less than the maximum void ratio of the host sand, emax,HS, both the silty sand and the host sand show similar Sus that is fairly independent of the initial confining stress. When es of the silty sand is in the vicinity of or exceeds emax,HS, the Sus depends on the initial effective confining stress. At such “loose” states, Sus normalized with respect to the initial consolidation stress, is very low and it decreases with a further increase in es. At a fines content greater than about 30%, a silty sand or sandy silt is expected to behave as a silt at an interfine void ratio, ef, defined as the void ratio of the silt-matrix (given by e/fc), unless the silty sand or sandy silt is very dense. A criterion is presented for the undrained shear strength behavior of silty sands in terms of relative percent compaction for field applications. Preliminary recommendations are presented for the choice of undrained strength for seismic stability evaluation against large deformations.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Alarcon-Guzman, A., Leonards, G. A., and Chameau, J.-L.(1988). “Undrained monotonic and cyclic strength of sands.”J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 114(10), 1089–1109.
2.
Baziar, M. H., and Dobry, R.(1995). “Residual strength and large-deformation potential of loose silty sands.”J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 121(12), 896–906.
3.
Castro, G. (1969). “Liquefaction of sands.”Harvard Soil Mech. Ser., (81).
4.
Castro, G., Keller, T. O., and Boynton, S. S. (1989). “Re-evaluation of the Lower San Fernando Dam: An investigation of the February 9, 1971 slide.”Contract Rep. D-89-2, Rep. 1, U.S. Army Corps of Engrs. Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss., 1–2.
5.
Drescher, A., and De Josselin de Jong, G.(1972). “Photoelastic verification of a mechanical model for the flow of a granular material.”J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 20, 337–351.
6.
Ishihara, K.(1993). “Liquefaction and flow failure during earthquakes.”Geotechnique, 43(3), 351–415.
7.
Kenney, T. C.(1977). “Residual strength of mineral mixtures.”Proc., 9th Int. Conf. Soil Mech. and Found. Eng., 1, 155–160.
8.
“Liquefaction of soils during earthquakes.” (1985). Rep. CETS-EE-001, Com. on Earthquake Engrg., Nat. Res. Council, Washington, D.C.
9.
Marcuson, W. F., Hadala, P. F., and Ledbetter, R. H.(1996). “Seismic rehabilitation of earth dams.”J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 122(1), 7–20.
10.
Mitchell, J. K. (1993). Fundamentals of soil behavior, 2nd Ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
11.
Mohamad, R., and Dobry, R.(1986). “Undrained monotonic and cyclic triaxial strength of sand.”J. Geotech, Engrg. Div., ASCE, 112(10), 941–958.
12.
Mushima, S., and Kimura, H.(1970). “Characteristics of landslides and embankment failures during the Tokachi-Oki earthquake.”Soils and Found., 10(2), 39–51.
13.
Pitman, T. D., Robertson, P. K., and Sego, D. C.(1994). “Influence of fines on the collapse of loose sands.”Can. Geotech. J., 31, 728–739.
14.
Poulos, S. J.(1981). “The steady state of deformation.”J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 107(5), 553–562.
15.
Poulos, S. J. (1988). “Chapter 9: liquefaction and related phenomena.”Advanced dam engineering for design, construction and rehabilitation, Robert Janson, ed., Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, N.Y.
16.
Poulos, S. J., Castro, G., and France, J. W.(1985). “Liquefaction evaluation procedure.”J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 111(6), 772–791.
17.
Roscoe, K. H., Schofield, A. N., and Thurairajah, A.(1963). “Yielding of clays in states wetter than critical.”Geotechnique, 13, 211–240.
18.
Roscoe, K. H., Schofield, A. N., and Wroth, C. P.(1958). “On the yielding of soils.”Geotechnique, 8, 22–52.
19.
Seed, H. B.(1987). “Design problems in soil liquefaction.”J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 113(8), 827–845.
20.
Seed, H. B., Seed, R. B., Harder, L. F., and Long, H. L. (1989). “Re-evaluation of the Lower San Fernando Dam.”Contract Rep. GL-89-2, Rep. 2, U.S. Army Corps of Engrs. Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss.
21.
Seed, R. B., and Harder, L. F. Jr.(1990). “SPT-based analysis of cyclic pore pressure generation and undrained residual strength.”Proc., Seed Memorial Symp., 2, 351–376.
22.
Singh, S. (1994). “Liquefaction characteristics of silts.”Ground failures under seismic conditions. Proc., ASCE Nat. Convention, Geotech. Spec. Publ. 44, S. Prakash and P. Dakoulas, eds., ASCE, Reston, Va., 105–116.
23.
Stark, T. D., and Mesri, G.(1992). “Undrained shear strength of liquefied sands for stability analysis.”J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 118(11), 1727–1747.
24.
Thevanayagam, S.(1997). “Dielectric dispersion of porous media as a fractal phenomenon.”J. Appl. Phys., 82(5), 2538–2547.
25.
Thevanayagam, S., and Nesarajah, S.(1998). “Fractal model for flow through saturated soils.”J Geotech. and Geoenvir. Engrg., ASCE, 124(1), 53–66.
26.
Thevanayagam, S., Ravishankar, K., and Mohan, S. (1996a). “Steady state strength, relative density and fines content relationship for sands.”Transp. Res. Record 1547, 61–67.
27.
Thevanayagam, S., Wang, C. C., and Ravishankar, K.(1996b). “Determination postliquefaction strength of sands: Steady state versus residual strength.”ASCE Geotech. Spec. Publ., 58(2), 1210–1224.
28.
Vaid, Y. P. (1994). “Liquefaction of silty soils.”Ground failures under seismic conditions. Proc., ASCE Nat. Convention, Geotech. Spec. Publ. 44, S. Prakash and P. Dakoulas, eds., ASCE, Reston, Va., 1–16.
29.
Vaid, Y. P., Chung, E. K. F., and Keurbis, R. H.(1990). “Stress path and steady state.”Can. Geotech. J., 27(1), 1–7.
30.
Yamada, G.(1996). “Damage to earth structures and foundations by the Niigata earthquake, June 16, 1964.”Soils and Found., 6(1), 1–13.
31.
Zlatovic, S., and Ishihara, K. (1995). “On the influence of nonplastic fines on residual strength.”Proc., IS-TOKYO'95, 1st Int. Conf. on Earthquake Geotech. Engrg., K. Ishihara, ed., A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 239–244.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Jun 1, 1998
Published in print: Jun 1998
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.