TECHNICAL PAPERS
Nov 1, 1997

Strain Rate Effects in Model Pressuremeter Testing

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 123, Issue 11

Abstract

A series of one-eighth-scale strain controlled model pressuremeter tests were performed using an automated flexible wall calibration chamber testing system. Undrained model pressuremeter tests were performed with and without the internal pore-water pressure measuring piezometer needles at radial strain rates ranging from 1 to 8%/min in a controlled laboratory setup in beds of kaolin clay prepared with known stress histories. Reference strength and deformations properties were determined using one-dimensional consolidation, isotropically consolidated undrained compression (CIUC) and Ko consolidated undrained compression (CKoUC) laboratory tests, and comparisons are made with the interpreted values from the pressuremeter test data. Interpretations of the undrained shear strength, initial shear modulus, shear stress–radial strain variation, limit pressure, and horizontal stress for each net pressuremeter curve were evaluated using various interpretation procedures, using the Marquardt-Levenberg algorithm. Based on the laboratory test data and the analytical interpretations, several conclusions were made regarding the effects of the rate of probe expansion on the deduced shear modulus, undrained shear strength, and limit pressure in the pressuremeter testing of clays.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
Ali, F. H.(1989). “Generation and dissipation of excess pore pressure during pressuremeter tests.”Soils and Found., Tokyo, Japan, 29(1), 173–179.
2.
Anderson, W. F., and Pyrah, I. C. (1986). “Undrained strength and deformation parameters from pressuremeter test results.” The Pressuremeter and Its Marine Applications, STP 950, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 324-338.
3.
Anderson, W. F., Pyrah, I. C., and Haji-Ali, F.(1987). “Rate effects in pressuremeter testing in clays.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 113(11), 1344–1358.
4.
Arnold, M.(1981). “An empirical evaluation of pressuremeter test data.”Can. Geotech. J., Ottawa, Canada, 18(3), 455–459.
5.
Bjerrum, L.(1972). “Embankments on soft ground.”Proc. ASCE Speciality Conf. on Perf. of Earth and Earth Supported Struct., Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, Ind., 2, 1–54.
6.
Carter, J. P. (1978). “A computer program for the analysis of a cylindrical cavity expansion in soil (CAMFE).”Rep. No. CUED/SOILS/TR52, Univ. of Cambridge, Cambridge, England.
7.
Casagrande, A., and Wilson, S. D.(1951). “Effect of rate of loading on the strength of clays and shales at constant water content.”Géotechnique, London, England, 2, 251–263.
8.
Campanella, R. G., and Vaid, Y. P.(1972). “A simple K0 triaxial cell.”Can. Geotech. J., Ottawa, Canada, 9, 249–260.
9.
Denby, G. M. (1978). “Self-boring pressuremeter study of the San Francisco Bay mud,” PhD thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.
10.
Ghionna, V. (1981). “Performance of self-boring pressuremeter tests in cohesive deposits.”Rep. No. FHWA/RD-81/173, Dept. of Civ. Engrg. MIT, Boston, Mass.
11.
Gibson, R. E., and Anderson, W. F.(1961). “In-situ measurement of soil properties with the pressuremeter.”Civ. Engrg. and Public Works Rev., London, England, 56(658), 615–618.
12.
Hanzawa, H., and Tanaka, H.(1992). “Normalized undrained strength of clay in the normally consolidated state and in the field.”Soils and Found., Tokyo, Japan, 32(1), 132–148.
13.
Hight, D. W. (1983). “Laboratory investigations on sea-bed clays,” PhD thesis, University of London, London, England.
14.
Huang, A. B., Chameau, J. L., and Holtz, R. D.(1986). “Interpretation of pressuremeter data in cohesive soils by simplex algorithm.”Géotechnique, London, England, 36(4), 599–604.
15.
Huang, A. B., Holtz, R. D., and Chameau, J. L.(1991). “Laboratory study of pressuremeter tests in clays.”J. Geotech. Engr., ASCE, 117(10), 1549–1567.
16.
Jamiolkowski, M., Leroueil, S., and Presti, L. (1991). “Theme lecture: design parameters from theory to practice.”Proc. Geo-Coast '91, Yokohama, Japan, 1–41.
17.
Kondner, R. L.(1963). “Hyperbolic stress-strain response for cohesive soils.”J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., ASCE, 89(1), 115–143.
18.
Kulhawy, F. H., and Mayne, P. W. (1990). “Manual on estimating soil properties for foundation design.”Rep. No. EL-6800, Electric Power Res. Inst., Palo Alto, Calif.
19.
Ladd, C. C. (1985). “Overview of clay behavior.”MIT Summer Course on Recent Developments in Measurement of Clays Behavior for Foundation Design, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
20.
Ladd, C. C.(1991). “Stability evaluation during staged construction.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 117(4), 540–615.
21.
Li, X. S., Chan, C. K., Shen, C. K. (1988). “An automated triaxial testing system.”Rep. No. STP 977, ASTM, Philadelphia, Pa., 95–106.
22.
Marquardt, D. W.(1963). “An algorithm for least squares estimation of nonlinear parameters.”J. of Soc. of Industrial and Appl. Mathematics, 11, 431–441.
23.
Mesri, G., Febres-Cordero, E., Shields, D. R., and Castro, A.(1981). “Shear stress-strain-time behavior of clays.”Géotechnique, London, England, 31(4), 537–552.
24.
Mukabi, J. N., Tatsuoka, F., and Hirose, K. (1991). “Effect of strain rate on small strain stiffness of kaolin.”Proc., XXV JSSMFE Conf., Nagano, Japan.
25.
Nakase, A., and Kamei, T.(1986). “Influence of strain rate on undrained shear characteristics of K0-consolidated cohesive soils.”Soils and Found., Tokyo, Japan, 26(1), 85–95.
26.
Palmer, A. C.(1972). “Undrained plane-strain expansion of a cylindrical cavity in clay: a simple interpretation of the pressuremeter test.” Géotechnique, London, England, 22(3), 451–457.
27.
Penumadu, D. (1993). “Strain rate effects on pressuremeter testing and neural network approach for soil modeling,” PhD thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Ga.
28.
Penumadu, D., and Chameau, J. L. (1995). “Interpretation of pressuremeter testing in cohesive soil.”The pressuremeter and its new avenues, Ballivy, ed., A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, Quebec, Canada, 215–222.
29.
Penumadu, D., and Chameau, J.-L. (1998). “Interpretation of model pressuremeter test using automated clay calibration chamber data.”In print, geotechnical testing journal. ASTM, Philadelphia, Pa.
30.
Prapaharan, S. (1987). “Effects of disturbance, strain rate, and partial drainage on pressuremeter test results in clay,” PhD thesis, Purdue University, W. Lafayette, Ind.
31.
Prapaharan, S., Chameau, J. L., and Holtz, R. D.(1989). “Effect of strain rate on undrained strength derived from pressuremeter tests.”Géotechnique, London, England, 39(4), 615–624.
32.
Prevost, J. H., and Hoeg, K.(1975). “Analysis of pressuremeter in strain-softening soil.”J. Geotech. Engrg., 101(8), 717–732.
33.
Pyrah, I. C., Anderson, W. F., and Pang, L. S. (1988). “Effects of test procedure on constant rate of strain pressuremeter tests in clay.”Proc. Num. Mtds. in Geomech., A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, Innsbruck, The Netherlands, 647–652.
34.
Sheahan, T. C., Ladd, C. C., and Germaine, J. T.(1996). “Rate-dependent undrained shear behavior of saturated clay.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 122(2), 99–108.
35.
Singh, A., and Mitchell, J. K.(1968). “General stress-strain-time function for soils.”J. Soil Mech. Found. Engng. Div., ASCE, 94(1), 21–46.
36.
Skempton, A. W., and Bishop, A. W. (1954). “Chapter 10: soils”Building materials. North Holland Publishing Co., London, England, 417–482.
37.
Tsuchida, T., and Kikuchi, Y.(1991). “K0 consolidation of undrained clays by means of triaxial cell.”Soils and Found., Tokyo, Japan, 31(3), 127–137.
38.
Vaid, Y. P., and Campanella, R. G.(1977). “Time dependent behavior of undisturbed clay.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 103(7), 693–709.
39.
Wroth, C. P.(1975). “In situ measurement of initial stresses and deformation characteristics.”Proc., Conf. In Situ Measurement of Soil Properties, ASCE, Raleigh, N.C., 2, 181–230.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 123Issue 11November 1997
Pages: 1051 - 1059

History

Published online: Nov 1, 1997
Published in print: Nov 1997

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Dayakar Penumadu
Asst. Prof., Dept. of Civ. and Envir. Engrg., Clarkson Univ., Potsdam, NY 13699–5710.
Jean-Lou Chameau, Members, ASCE
Prof. and Vice Provost, Dept. of Civ. and Envir. Engrg., Georgia Inst. of Technol., Atlanta, GA 30332.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share