Nonlinear Flexural Behavior of Prestressed Concrete Girder Bridges
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 6, Issue 4
Abstract
This paper presents a procedure to improve the accuracy of the classical grillage method for the nonlinear analysis of concrete girder bridges. The procedure uses equivalent element plastic hinge lengths that account for the actual mesh size instead of using a mesh-independent global plastic hinge length. A thorough review of the results of tests conducted on two 1/3-model prestressed concrete girders and a 1/3-model prestressed concrete girder bridge is undertaken in order to model the nonlinear properties of prestressed concrete girder bridges. The purpose of this review is to study the extent of plastification and plastic hinge length development as well as the evaluation of the validity of the grillage method for the nonlinear analysis of girder bridges. An Lp transfer model is used to calculate the plastic hinge length for every beam element of the grillage based on the results from the experiments and other empirical models. The Lp transfer model allows the use of empirical data obtained from tests on individual girders to model the response of a variety of bridge configurations subjected to different loading conditions. The equivalent grillage element plastic hinge length Lgp is calculated as a function of the grillage mesh size. A number of examples are presented to demonstrate the validity of the proposed method by comparing the analytical results of grillage analysis using the Lp transfer model with those of laboratory and in situ tests on full-scale and model-scale prestressed concrete bridges. The proposed approach has a high potential for use in engineering practice because of the simple input requirement and improved accuracy.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). ( 1994). LRFD bridge design specifications for highway bridges, 1st Ed., Washington, D.C.
2.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). ( 1996). Standard specifications for highway bridges, 16th Ed., Washington, D.C.
3.
Baker, A. L. L. ( 1956). Ultimate load theory applied to the design of reinforced and prestressed concrete frames, Concrete Publications Ltd., London.
4.
Burdette, E. G., and Goodpasture, D. W. ( 1971). “Full scale bridge testing—An evaluation of bridge design criteria.” Res. Rep., University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tenn.
5.
Ghosn, M., and Casas, J. R. ( 1996). Evaluation of existing highway bridge systems, Monograph CIMNE No. 30, International Center for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Barcelona, Spain.
6.
Ghosn, M., Casas, J. R., and Xu, J. M. ( 1996). “Development of an efficient program for the nonlinear analysis of bridges.” Comp. and Struct., 61(3), 459–470.
7.
Ghosn, M., Deng, L., Xu, J. M., Liu, Y., and Moses, F. ( 1997). “Documentation of program NONBAN.” NCHRP 12-36, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, D.C.
8.
Ghosn, M., and Moses, F. ( 1998). “Redundancy in highway bridge superstructures.” NCHRP Rep. 406, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, D.C.
9.
Gossbell, K. B., and Stevens, L. K. ( 1968). “Test loading of a full scale bridge.” Proc., Australia Res. Board, Vol. 4, Part 2, 2018–2041.
10.
Hambly, E. C. ( 1991). Bridge deck behavior, E & FN Spon, London.
11.
Livesley, R. K. ( 1970). Matrix methods of structural analysis, Pergamon, Oxford.
12.
Mattock, A. H. ( 1965). “Rotational capacity of hinging regions in reinforced concrete beams.” Proc., ASCE-ACI Int. Symp. on Flexural Mech. of Reinforced Concrete, 143–181.
13.
Mattock, A. H. (1967). “Discussion of `Rotational capacity of reinforced concrete beams,' by W. G. Corley.”J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 93(2), 519–522.
14.
Park, R., and Pauley, T. ( 1975). Reinforced concrete structures, Wiley, New York.
15.
Razaqpur, A. G., and Nofal, M. ( 1988). “Transverse load distribution at ultimate limit states in single span slab-on-girder bridges with compact steel girders.” MISC-88-01, Ontario Ministry of Transportation, Ontario, Canada.
16.
Ricles, J. M., and Popov, E. P. (1994). “Inelastic link element for EBF seismic analysis.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 120(2), 441–463.
17.
Sawyer, H. A. ( 1964). “Design of concrete frames for two failure states.” Proc., ASCE-ACI Int. Symp. on the Flexural Mech. of Reinforced Concrete, 405–431.
18.
Skogman, B. C., Tadros, M., and Grasmick, R. ( 1988). “Ductility of reinforced and prestressed concrete flexural members.” PCI J., November-December.
19.
Znidaric, A., and Moses, F. ( 1997). “Structural safety of existing road bridges.” Proc., 7th Int. Conf. on Struct. Safety and Reliability ICOSSAR '97, Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 1843–1850.
20.
Znidaric, A., and Moses, F. ( 1998). “Resistance of deteriorated post-tensioned concrete beams—An ongoing research.” Proc., 8th IFIP WG 7.5 Working Conf. on Reliability and Optimization of Struct. Sys., 339–346.
21.
Zokaie, T., Osterkamp, T. A., and Imbsen, R. A. ( 1991). “Distribution of wheel loads on highway bridges.” Final Rep. NCHRP Proj. 12-26, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, D.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 6 • Issue 4 • August 2001
Pages: 276 - 284
History
Received: Apr 24, 2000
Published online: Aug 1, 2001
Published in print: Aug 2001
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.