Influence of Sidewalks and Railings on Wheel Load Distribution in Steel Girder Bridges
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 2, Issue 3
Abstract
The conventional analysis and design of highway bridges ignore the contribution of sidewalks and/or railings in a bridge deck when calculating the flexural strength of superstructures. The presence of sidewalks and railings or parapets acting integrally with the bridge deck have the effect of stiffening the outside girders and attracting more load while reducing the load effects in the interior girders. This paper presents the results of a parametric study showing the influence of typical sidewalks and railings on wheel load distribution as well as on the load-carrying capacity of highway bridges. A typical one-span, two-lane, simply supported, composite steel girder bridge was selected in order to investigate the influence of various parameters such as: span length, girder spacing, sidewalks, and railings. A total of 120 bridges were analyzed using three-dimensional finite-element analysis. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) HS20 design trucks were positioned in both lanes to produce the maximum moments. The finite-element analysis results were also compared with AASHTO wheel load distribution factors. The AASHTO load and resistance factor design (LRFD) wheel load distribution formula correlated conservatively with the finite-element results and all were less than the typical empirical formula (S/5.5). The presence of sidewalks and railings were shown to increase the load-carrying capacity by as much as 30% if they were included in the strength evaluation of highway bridges.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Burdette, E. G., and Goodpasture, D. W. (1988). “Correlation of bridge load capacity estimates with test data.”Rep. No. 306, Nat. Cooperative Hwy. Res. Program, Transp. Res. Board, Washington, D.C.
2.
Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) bridge design specifications. (1994). Am. Assn. of State Hwy. and Transp. Officials (AASHTO), Washington, D.C.
3.
Mabsout, M. E., Tarhini, K. M., Frederick, G. R., and Tayar, C.(1997). “Finite-element analysis of steel girder highway bridges.”J. Bridge Engrg., ASCE, 2(3), 83–87.
4.
Nutt, R. V., Schamber, R. A., and Zokaie, T. (1988). “Distribution of wheel loads on highway bridges.”Final Rep. No. 83 (NCHRP Proj. No. 12–26), Imbsen & Associates, Inc., Sacramento, Calif.
5.
SAP90, a series of computer programs for the finite element analysis of structures. (1992). Computers & Structures Inc., Berkeley, Calif.
6.
Standard specifications for highway bridges, 15th Ed. (1992). Am. Assn. of State Hwy. and Transp. Officials (AASHTO), Washington, D.C.
7.
Tarhini, K. M., and Frederick, G. R.(1992). “Wheel load distribution in I-girder highway bridges.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 118(5), 1285–1294.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 2 • Issue 3 • August 1997
Pages: 88 - 96
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Aug 1, 1997
Published in print: Aug 1997
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.