TECHNICAL PAPERS
Apr 1, 2009

Watersheds at Risk to Increased Impervious Surface Cover in the Conterminous United States

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 14, Issue 4

Abstract

In this paper, we estimated impervious surface from United States census housing density data sets for the conterminous United States to examine the distribution and extent of impaired watersheds, and to estimate the risk to watersheds from development in the near future. We used regression tree methods to relate estimates of current housing density to the 2001 National Land Cover Database (NLCD) percent urban imperviousness. As of 2000, we estimate 83,749km2 of impervious surface (IS) cover across the United States (about 9.6% lower than the NLCD). We estimate that IS cover will expand to 114,070km2 by 2030. About 7% of eight-digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) watersheds (3.6% of the conterminous United States) were stressed or degraded ( >5% IS) in 2000, and we estimated that this will increase to nearly double to 8.5% of watersheds by 2030 (6.3% of area). We explored the subtle differences of fine-grain pattern for different urban land use types by comparing our national estimates of IS to those developed for the Chesapeake Bay watershed. We also found important nonlinear affects of watershed scale and aggregation, whereby estimates of IS could differ by roughly ten-fold.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by the US Environmental Protection Agency Global Change Research group under GSA Contract No. UNSPECIFIEDGS-10F-0124J (to Theobald), an EPA STAR grant (Grant No. UNSPECIFIEDR82868401 to Goetz), and a NASA Applied Sciences Program grant on Ecological Condition of United States National Parks (to Theobald and Goetz). The views expressed in this paper are those of the writers and not the funding agencies. The writers thank C. Elvidge and L. Exum for sharing data sets used for validation, and the helpful comments from the reviewers that improved this paper. S.G. acknowledges the assistance of M. Sun and C. Jantz with processing data sets and graphics.

References

Allan, J. D. (2004). “Landscapes and riverscapes: The influence of land use on stream ecosystems.” Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 35, 257–284.
Arnolds, C. L., Jr., and Gibbons, C. J. (1996). “Impervious surface coverage—The emergence of a key environmental indicator.” J. Am. Plan. Assn., 62(2), 243–258.
Baker, M. E., Weller, D. E., and Jordan, T. E. (2006). “Improved methods for quantifying potential nutrient interception by riparian buffers.” Landscape Ecol., 21, 1327–1345.
Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Olshen, R., and Stone, C. (1984). Classification and regression trees, Chapman and Hall, New York.
Chabaeva, A. A., Civco, D. L., and Prisloe, S. (2004). “Development of a population density and land use based regression model to calculate the amount of imperviousness.” Proc., ASPRS Ann. Conv., Denver, American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Bethesda, Md.
De’ath, G., and Fabricius, K. E. (2000). “Classification and regression trees: A powerful yet simple technique for ecological data analysis.” Ecology, 81(1), 3178–3192.
Dougherty, M., Dymond, R. L., Goetz, S. J., Jantz, C. A., and Goulet, N. (2004). “Evaluation of impervious surface estimates in a rapidly urbanizing watershed.” Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 70(11), 1275–1284.
Elvidge, C. D., et al. (2004). “US constructed area approaches the size of Ohio.” EOS Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 85(24), 233–240.
Elvidge, C. D., et al. (2007). “Global distribution and density of constructed impervious surfaces.” Sensors, 7, 1962–1979.
Exum, L. R., Bird, S. L., Harrison, J., and Perkins, C. A. (2005). “Estimating and projecting impervious cover in the southeastern United States.” EPA Rep. No. EPA/600/R-05/061, EPA, Washington, D.C.
Friedl, M. A., and Brodley, C. E. (1997). “Decision tree classification of land cover from remotely sensed data.” Remote Sens. Environ., 61, 399–409.
Gergel, S. E., Turner, M. G., Miller, J. R., Melack, J. M., and Stanley, E. H. (2002). “Landscape indicators of human impacts to riverine systems.” Aq. Sciences, 64, 118–128.
Goetz, S. J., and Fiske, G. (2008). “Linking the diversity of stream biota to landscapes in the mid-Atlantic USA.” Remote Sens. Environ., 112(S11), 4075–4085.
Goetz, S. J., and Jantz, P. (2006). “Satellite maps show Chesapeake Bay urban development.” EOS Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 87, 149–152.
Goetz, S. J., Wright, R. K., Smith, A. J., Zinecker, E., and Schaub, E. (2003). “IKONOS imagery for resource management: Tree cover, impervious surfaces, and riparian buffer analyses in the mid-Atlantic region.” Remote Sens. Environ., 88(1–2), 195–208.
Hall, R. K., et al. (2000). “EMAP design and river reach file 3 (RF3) as a sample frame in the Central Valley, California.” Environ. Monit. Assess., 64, 69–80.
Homer, C., Huang, C., Yang, L., Wylie, B., and Coan, M. (2004). “Development of a 2001 National Landcover Database for the United States.” Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 70(7), 829–840.
Jantz, C. A., Goetz, S. J., and Shelley, M. K. (2003). “Using the SLEUTH urban growth model to simulate the impacts of future policy scenarios on urban land use in the Baltimore-Washington metropolitan area.” Environ. Plann. B, 30, 251–271.
Jantz, P., Goetz, S. J., and Jantz, C. (2005). “Urbanization and the loss of resource lands in the Chesapeake Bay watershed.” Environ. Manage. (N.Y.), 36(6), 808–825.
Jennings, D. B., Jarnagin, S. T., and Ebert, D. W. (2004). “A modeling approach for estimating watershed impervious surface area from National Land Cover Data 92.” Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 70(11), 1295–1307.
Maidment, D., and Djokic, D. (2000). Hydrologic and hydraulic modeling support with geographic information systems, ESRI Press, Redlands, Calif.
Moglen, G. E., and Kim, S. (2007). “Limiting imperviousness: are threshold-based policies a good idea?” J. Am. Plan. Assn., 73(2), 161–171.
Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics Consortium (MRLC). (2007). ⟨www.mrlc.gov⟩ (Feb. 12, 2007).
NOAA Coastal Services Center. (2002). Impervious surface analysis tool, ⟨http://www.csc.noaa.gov/crs/cwq/isat.html⟩ (May 21, 2008).
Paul, M. J., and Meyer, J. L. (2001). “Streams in the urban landscape.” Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 32, 333–365.
Peterson, E. E., Theobald, D. M., and Ver Hoef, J. M. (2007). “Geostatistical modeling on stream networks: Developing valid covariance matrices based on hydrologic distance and stream flow.” Freshwater Biol., 52, 267–279.
Reilly, J., Maggio, P., and Karp, S. (2004). “A model to predict impervious surface for regional and municipal land use planning purposes.” Environ. Impact. Asses. Rev., 24, 363–382.
Schueler, T. (2003). “Impacts of impervious cover on aquatic systems,” Rep. to Watershed Protection Research Monograph #1, Center for Watershed Protection, Ellicot City, Md.
Seaber, P. R., Kapinos, F. P., and Knapp, G. L. (1987). “Hydrologic unit maps.” U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2294, Washington, D.C.
Slonecker, E. T., and Tilley, J. S. (2004). “An evaluation of the individual components and accuracies associated with the determination of impervious area.” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 41(2), 165–184.
Snyder, M. N., Goetz, S. J., and Wright, R. K. (2005). “Stream health rankings predicted by satellite derived land cover metrics.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 41(3), 659–677.
Stankowski, S. J. (1972). “Population density as an indirect indicator of urban and suburban land-surface modifications.” U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C., B219–B224.
Theobald, D. M. (2001). “Land use dynamics beyond the American urban fringe.” Geogr. Rev., 91(3), 544–564.
Theobald, D. M. (2005). “Landscape patterns of exurban growth in the USA from 1980 to 2020.” Ecol. & Soc., 10(1), 32, ⟨http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art32/⟩.
Theobald, D. M. (2007). GIS concepts and ArcGIS methods, 3rd Ed., Conservation Planning Technologies, Fort Collins, Colo.
Theobald, D. M., Norman, J. B., Peterson, E., Wade, A., and Ferraz, S. (2006). “Functional linkage of watersheds and streams (FLoWs) user’s manual: Network-based ArcGIS tools to analyze freshwater ecosystems.” Rep., Natural Resource Ecology Lab., Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, Colo., ⟨www.nrel.colostate.edu/projects/starmap⟩.
Theobald, D. M., Stevens, D. L., Jr., White, D., Urquhart, N. S., Olsen, A. R., and Norman, J. B. (2007). “Using GIS to generate spatially-balanced random survey designs for natural resource applications.” Environ. Manage. (N.Y.), 40(1), 134–146.
Vogel, R. M., Wilson, I., and Daly, C. (1999). “Regional regression models of annual streamflow for the United States.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 125(3), 148–157.
Ward, D., Phinn, S. R., and Murray, A. T. (2000). “Monitoring growth in rapidly urbanizing areas using remotely sensed data.” Profess. Geograph., 52(3), 371–386.
Wright, J. K. (1936). “A method of mapping densities of population.” Geogr. Rev., 26, 103–110.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 14Issue 4April 2009
Pages: 362 - 368

History

Received: Mar 31, 2008
Accepted: Jun 9, 2008
Published online: Apr 1, 2009
Published in print: Apr 2009

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

David M. Theobald [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Human Dimensions of Natural Resources and Research Scientist, Natural Resource Ecology Lab, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523-1480 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Scott J. Goetz
Senior Scientist, Woods Hole Research Center, Falmouth, MA 02540-1644.
John B. Norman
Research Associate, Natural Resource Ecology Lab, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523-1499.
Patrick Jantz
Ph.D. Candidate, Bren School of Environmental Science & Management, Univ. of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share