TECHNICAL PAPERS
Sep 1, 2008

Grid Scale Effects on Watershed Soil Erosion Models

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 13, Issue 9

Abstract

The model CASC2D-SED was applied to the Goodwin Creek experimental watershed in Mississippi to define erosion model response to raster-based grid cell sizes. The model was parameterized at a 30m grid, then calibrated and validated to three representative thunderstorms. The simulated hydrographs replicated the measurements of peak discharge, runoff volume, and time to peak. The model also calculated sediment yields within ±50% of the field measurements. Resampling the watershed digital elevation model at scales from 30m to 330m reduced the land surface slopes and changed the channel topology. In general, very good modeling results are obtained at grid sizes of 30m and 90m , which is comparable to the plot sizes of the universal soil loss equation. At grid sizes coarser than 150m , the sediment source areas became less appropriately depicted and the calculated sediment delivery ratios became unrealistically high. Grid sizes smaller than 150m are recommended for proper watershed simulation of upland erosion and sediment yield.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

Financial support was granted through the Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agrarias of Spain and the Department of Defense through the Center for Geosciences/Atmospheric Research at Colorado State University, under Cooperative Agreement No. UNSPECIFIEDDAAL01-98-2-0078 with the Army Research Laboratory. Goodwin Creek field data were provided courtesy of Carlos Alonso at the USDA-ARS-National Sedimentation Laboratory in Oxford, MS. The collaboration with J. Jorgeson at the Engineer Research and Development Center in Vicksburg, MS, and D. Molnar formerly at Colorado State University has also been greatly appreciated.

References

Alonso, C. V. (1996). “Hydrologic research on the USDA Goodwin Creek experimental watershed, northern Mississippi.” Proc., 16th AGU Hydrology Days, 25–36, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, Colo.
Beven, K. (1995). “Linking parameters across scales: Subgrid parameterizations and scale-dependent hydrological models.” Hydrolog. Process., 9(5–6), 507–525.
Blackmarr, W. A. (1995). “Documentation of hydrologic, geomorphic, and sediment transport measurements on the Goodwin Creek experimental watershed, northern Mississippi, for the period 1982–1993—Preliminary release.” USDA-ARS Rep. No. 3 (CD-ROM), U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Oxford, Miss.
Boyce, R. (1975). “Sediment routing with sediment delivery ratios.” Proc., Present and Prospective Technology for Predicting Sediment Yields and Sources, USDA-ARS-S-40, ARS-USDA, Washington, D.C., 61–65.
Brooks, S. M., and McDonnell, R. A. (2000). “Research advances in geocomputation for hydrological and geomorphological modeling towards the twenty-first century.” Hydrolog. Process., 14(11–12), 1899–1907.
Bruneau, P., Gascuel-Odoux, C., Tobin, P., Merot, P., and Beven, K. (1995). “Sensitivity to space and time resolution of a hydrological model using digital elevation data.” Hydrolog. Process., 9(1), 69–81.
De Roo, A. P. J. (1996). “Soil erosion assessment using GIS.” Geographical information systems in hydrology, Kluwer, Boston, 339–356.
Engelund, F., and Hansen, E. (1967). Monograph on sediment transport in alluvial streams, Teknisk Forlag, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Johnson, B. E., Julien, P. Y., Molnar, D. K., and Watson, C. C. (2000). “The two-dimensional upland erosion model CASC2D-SED.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 36(1), 31–42.
Julien, P. Y. (1995). Erosion and sedimentation, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Julien, P. Y. (2002). River mechanics, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Julien, P. Y., and Frenette, M. (1987). “Macroscale analysis of upland erosion.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 32(3), 347–358.
Julien, P. Y., and González del Tanago, M. (1991). “Spatially varied soil erosion under different climates.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 36(6), 511–524.
Julien, P. Y., and Rojas, R. (2002). “Upland erosion modeling with CASC2D-SED.” Int. J. Sediment Res., 17(4), 265–274.
Julien, P. Y., Saghafian, B., and Ogden, F. L. (1995). “Raster-based hydrologic modeling of spatially-varied surface runoff.” Water Resour. Bull., 31(3), 523–536.
Julien, P. Y., and Simons, D. B. (1985). “Sediment transport capacity of overland flow.” Trans. ASAE, 28(3), 755–762.
Kalin, L., Govindaraju, R., and Hantush, M. (2003). “Effect of geomorphologic resolution on modeling of runoff hydrograph and sedimentograph over small watersheds.” J. Hydrol., 276(1–4), 89–111.
Kilinc, M. Y., and Richardson, E. V. (1973). “Mechanics of soil erosion from overland flow generated by simulated rainfall.” Hydrology Papers No. 63, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, Colo.
Kuo, W. L., et al. (1999). “Effects of grid size on runoff and soil moisture for a variable-source-area hydrology model.” Water Resour. Res., 35(11), 3419–3428.
Lane, L. J., Shirley, E. D., and Singh, V. P. (1988). “Modelling erosion on hillslopes.” Modelling geomorphological systems, M. G. Anderson, ed., Wiley, New York, 287–308.
Molnar, D. K., and Julien, P. Y. (1998). “Estimation of upland erosion using GIS.” Comput. Geosci., 24(2), 183–192.
Molnar, D. K., and Julien, P. Y. (2000). “Grid size effects on surface runoff modeling.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 5(1), 8–16.
Prosser, I., and Rustomji, P. (2000). “Sediment transport capacity relations for overland flow.” Prog. Phys. Geogr., 24(2), 179–193.
Quinn, P., Beven, K., Chevallier, P., and Planchon, O. (1991). “The prediction of hillslope flow paths for distributed hydrological modeling using digital terrain models.” Hydrolog. Process., 5(1), 59–79.
Rawls, W. J., Brakensiek, D. L., and Miller, N. (1983). “Green-ampt infiltration parameters from soils data.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 109(1), 62–70.
Refsgaard, J. (1997). “Parameterisation, calibration and validation of distributed hydrological models.” J. Hydrol., 198(1–4), 69–97.
Rojas, R. (2002). “GIS-based upland erosion modeling, geovisualization, and grid size effects on erosion simulations with CASC2D-SED.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, Colo.
Saulnier, G.-M., Obled, C., and Beven, K. (1997). “Analytical compensation between DTM grid resolution and effective values of saturated hydraulic conductivity within the TOPMODEL framework.” Hydrolog. Process., 11(9), 1331–1346.
Saxton, K., Rawls, W., Romberger, J., and Papendick, R. (1986). “Estimating generalized soil-water characteristics from texture.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 50(4), 1031–1036.
Schoorl, J. M., Sonneveld, M. P. W., and Veldkamp, A. (2000). “Three-dimensional landscape process modelling: The effect of DEM resolution.” Earth Surf. Processes Landforms, 25(9), 1025–1034.
Thieken, A. H., Lücke, A., Diekkrüger, B., and Richter, O. (1999). “Scaling input data by GIS for hydrological modelling.” Hydrolog. Process., 13(4), 611–630.
Vázquez, R. F., Feyen, L., Feyen, J., and Refsgaard, C. (2002). “Effect of grid size on effective parameters and model performance of the MIKE-SHE code.” Hydrolog. Process., 16(2), 355–372.
Velleux, M., Julien, P. Y., Rojas-Sanchez, R., Clements, W., and England, J. (2006). “Simulation of metals transport and toxicity at a mine-impacted watershed: California Gulch Colorado.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 40(22), 6996–7004.
Wang, M., Hjelmfelt, A. T., and Garbrecht, J. (2000). “DEM aggregation for watershed modeling.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 36(3), 579–584.
Wischmeier, W. H., and Smith, D. D. (1978). “Predicting rainfall erosion losses—A guide to conservation planning.” USDA handbook No. 537, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture in cooperation with Purdue Agricultural Experiment Station.
Wolock, D. M., and McCabe, G. J. (2000). “Differences in topographic characteristics computed from 100- and 1,000-m resolution digital elevation model data.” Hydrolog. Process., 14(6), 987–1002.
Wolock, D. M., and Price, C. V. (1994). “Effects of digital elevation model map scale and data resolution on a topography-based watershed model.” Water Resour. Res., 30(11), 3041–3052.
Woolhiser, D. A. (1975). “Simulation of unsteady overland flow.” Unsteady flow in open channels, K. Mahmood and V. Yevjevich, eds., Water Resources Publications, Fort Collins, Colo.
Yu, Z. (1997). “Grid-spacing effect on watershed hydrologic simulations.” Hydrol. Sci. Technol., 13(1–4), 75–85.
Zhang, W., and Montgomery, D. R. (1994). “Digital elevation model grid size, landscape representation, and hydrologic simulations.” Water Resour. Res., 30(4), 1019–1028.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 13Issue 9September 2008
Pages: 793 - 802

History

Received: Aug 30, 2006
Accepted: Dec 6, 2007
Published online: Sep 1, 2008
Published in print: Sep 2008

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Rosalia Rojas
Research Associate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523–1320. E-mail: [email protected]
Mark Velleux
Senior Project Manager, HydroQual, Inc., 1200 MacArthur Blvd., Mahwah, NJ 07430. E-mail: [email protected]
Pierre Y. Julien, M.ASCE
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523–1320. E-mail: [email protected]
Billy E. Johnson
Research Hydraulic Engineer, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS 39180.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share