Field Comparison of Rock-Filled and Chambered Trench Systems
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 13, Issue 8
Abstract
A field evaluation was conducted in Minnesota to identify whether there is a statistical difference in performance between chambered and rock-filled trench systems. This was achieved by a large-scale survey of over 100 selected onsite systems of both rock-filled and chambered trenches. Each system type was studied within three major soil permeability categories (fast, medium, and slow) and the percentage of the system in use at the time of the site visit was determined. Adjusting both types of systems to a standard size datum, the ponding levels were compared. Nearly 60% of the systems visited during the study of ages 5–10 years did not have any ponding observed at the end of the first trench segment. When the amount of ponding was compared between rock-filled and chambered systems, the data did not prove the hypothesis that chambered systems of a similar age as rock-filled systems utilize 25% less area than rock systems at 10% significance level.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
Sincere thanks to Michael Hanson (Cottonwood County), Pam Holst (Goodhue County), Laird Hensel (Hubbard County), Dennis Manning (Olmsted County), Hank Schreifels (Stearns County), Chris LeClair (Washington County), and Kimberly Jopp (Wright County) for assistance in determining appropriate sites. The property owners in this study also deserve acknowledgment, as without them, this study would not have been possible. The project team would like to thank Infiltrator Systems, Inc. and the University of Minnesota for funding to support this project.
References
Amerson, R. S., Tyler, E. J., and Converse, J. C. (1991). “Infiltration as affected by compaction, fines and contact area of gravel.” Proc., On-Site Wastewater Treatment: Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, ASAE, St. Joseph, Mich., 243–247.
Beach, D. N. H., McCray, J. E., Lowe, K. S., and Siegrist, R. L. (2005). “Temporal changes in hydraulic conductivity of sand porous media biofilters during wastewater infiltration due to biomat formation.” J. Hydrol., 31, 230–243.
Dix, S. (2001). “Effects of sand texture on sidewall absorption of septic tank effluent.” Proc., On-Site Wastewater Treatment: Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, ASAE, St. Joseph, Mich., 159–170.
Dix, S., and Hoxie, D. (2001). “Analysis of septic system longevity in Maine.” Proc., On-Site Wastewater Treatment: Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, ASAE, St. Joseph, Mich., 340–348.
Hall, S. (2001). “Special features and applications of drainfield products.” Rule Development Committee Issue Research Rep. No. WAC 246-272-11501(2)(k)(l), Washington State Dept. of Health.
Hoover, M. T., and Hinson, T. H. (2002). “Oregon on-site wastewater system field performance assessment.” Final Project Rep. to Infiltrator Systems, Inc., and Oregon Dept. of Environmental Quality, On-Site Corp. and Cpec Environmental, Inc.
Koch, G. S., and Link, R. F. (1980). Statistical analysis of geological data, Wiley, New York.
Kropf, F. W., Laak, R., and Healy, K. A. (1977). “Equilibrium operation of subsurface absorption systems.” J. Water Pollut. Control Fed., 49(9), 2007–2016.
Lowe, K., Siegrist, R. L., and Tacket, K. (2006). “Hydraulic loading rate and infiltrative surface architecture effects on septic tank treatment during soil infiltration.” Proc., 2006 NOWRA Technical Education Conf., No. PE-06-38.
Mayer, P. W., DeOreo, W. B., Opitz, E. M., Kiefer, J. C., Davis, W. Y., and Dziegielewski, B. (1999). “Residential end uses of water.” AWWA Research Foundation and the American Water Works Association, Denver, Colo.
Minnesota Climatology Working Group (2006). “Soil moisture data.” http://climate.umn.edu/doc/agwx.htm .
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). (2002). “Individual sewage treatment system standards: Chapter 7080 MN rules.” Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Water Quality Div., St. Paul, Minn.
Olson, K., Gustafson, D. M., Christopherson, S., and Luikkonen, B. (2005). “Septic system’s owners guide.” Univ. of Minnesota Extension Service, St. Paul, Minn.
Radcliffe, D., West, L., and Singer, J. (2005). “Gravel effect on wastewater infiltration from septic system trenches.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 69, 1217–1224.
Siegrist, R. L., McCray, J. E., and Lowe, K. S. (2004). “Wastewater infiltration into soil and the effects of infiltrative surface architecture.” Small Flows J., 5(1), 29–39.
Siegrist, R. L., Van Cuyk, S., Masson, S., and Fischer, E. (2000). “Field evaluation of wastewater soil absorption systems with aggregate-free and aggregate-laden infiltrative surfaces.” Final Project Rep. for Infiltrator Systems, Inc., Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colo.
Systat Software, Inc. (2000). “SYSTAT Version 9.01.” Systat Software, Inc., San Jose, Calif.
Uebler, R. L., et al. (2006). “Performance of chamber and EZ1203H systems compared to conventional gravel septic tank systems in North Carolina.” Proc., NOWRA Technical Education Conf., No. PE-06-38.
Walsh, D. R., Lowe, K., McCray, J., and Siegrist, R. L. (2006). “Infiltrative capacity of receiving media as affected by effluent quality, infiltrative surface architecture and hydraulic loading rate.” Proc., NOWRA Technical Education Conf., No. PE-06-41.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 13 • Issue 8 • August 2008
Pages: 671 - 680
Copyright
© 2008 ASCE.
History
Received: Nov 7, 2006
Accepted: Jul 3, 2007
Published online: Aug 1, 2008
Published in print: Aug 2008
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.