TECHNICAL PAPERS
Sep 1, 2006

Evaluation of the National Weather Service Operational Hydrologic Model and Forecasts for the American River Basin

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 11, Issue 5

Abstract

This paper evaluates the National Weather Service operational hydrologic model and operational flow forecasts for several subbasins of the American River. The evaluation includes: (1) the quality of the 6-h operational flow forecasts with up to 5days lead time; (2) the hydrologic model ability to reproduce observed mean daily flows; and (3) the reliability of the ensemble streamflow predictions of the hydrologic model to reproduce extremes of the monthly volume of full natural flow to Folsom Lake. The results indicate that the model represents the observed flow record well for sites and/or flow ranges unaffected by upstream regulation. Real time operational forecast produced by a forecaster that considers model predictions have good skill out to 18h with precipitation forecast contributing significantly to forecast uncertainty. Certain high-flow events with a spatially distributed mix of snow/rain over the basin may not be reproduced well by the basic spatially lumped structure of the operational snow–soil–channel model. It is suggested to incorporate upstream regulation rules into the operational models for better reproduction of observed medium and low flows. Routine evaluation based on a national archive of operational flow forecasts and observations is also recommended.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The writers gratefully acknowledge the many and varied contributions of CNRFC personnel, and especially Eric Strem, and Robert Hartman, in making data available and in providing comments and reviews of our results and of early versions of this paper. They also thank three anonymous reviewers for their contribution toward improving the clarity of the original manuscript. The research was sponsored by the Ecosystem Restoration California Bay Delta Authority (Award No. UNSPECIFIEDERP-02-P13), the NOAA Office of Global Programs (Award No. UNSPECIFIEDNA16GP2711), and by the PIER Program of the California Energy Commission (Award No. UNSPECIFIED500-02-008) as part of the Integrated Forecast and Reservoir Management (INFORM) Project. Additional support was provided by the USA Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District, under Award No. UNSPECIFIEDDACW05-02-P-0183. The opinions expressed herein are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect those of the sponsoring Agencies and their subagencies.

References

Anderson, E. A. (1973). “National Weather Service river forecast system—Snow accumulation and ablation model.” NOAA Technical Memorandum NWS HYDRO-17, Office of Hydrology, National Weather Service, NOAA, Silver Spring, Md.
Berri, G. J., and Flamenco, E. A. (1999). “Seasonal volume forecast of the Diamante River, Argentina, based on El Niño observations and predictions.” Water Resour. Res., 35(12), 3803–3810.
Box, G. E. P., and Cox, O. R. (1964). “The analysis of transformation.” J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. Methodol., 26(2), 211–252.
Bradley, A. A., Schwartz, S. S., and Hashino, T. (2004). “Distributed-oriented verification of ensemble streamflow predictions.” J. Hydrometeor., 5(3), 532–545.
Burnash, R. J. C., Ferral, R. L., and McGuire, R. A. (1973). “A generalized streamflow simulation system: conceptual modeling for digital computers.” US National Weather Service and California Department of Water Resources Rep., Joint Federal State River Forecast Center, Sacramento, Calif.
Carpenter, T. M., and Georgakakos, K. P. (2001). “Assessment of Folsom Lake response to historical and potential future climate scenarios: 1. Forecasting.” J. Hydrol., 249(1), 148–175.
Case, J. L., Manobianco, J., Dianic, A. V., Wheeler, M. M., Harms, E., and Parks, C. R. (2002). “Verification of high-resolution RAMS forecasts over east-central Florida during the 1999 and 2000 summer months.” Weather Forecast., 17(6), 1133–1151.
Cayan, D. R., Kammerdiener, S. A., Dettinger, M. D., Caprio, J. M., and Peterson, D. H. (2001). “Changes in the onset of spring in the Western United States.” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 82(3), 399–413.
Day, G. N. (1985). “Extended Streamflow forecasting using the NWSRFS.” J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage., 111(2), 3157–170.
Franz, K. J., Hartmann, H. C., Sorooshian, S., and Bales, R. (2003). “Verification of National Weather Service ensemble streamflow predictions for water supply forecasting in the Colorado River Basin.” J. Hydrometeor., 4(6), 1105–1118.
Gentry, R. C. (1950). “Forecasting local showers in Florida during the summer.” Mon. Weather Rev., 78(3), 41–49.
Georgakakos, A. P., Mullusky, M. G., and Georgakakos, K. P. (1998). “Impacts of climate variability on the operational forecast and management of the upper Des Moines River basin.” Water Resour. Res., 34(4), 799–821.
Georgakakos, K. P. (1986). “A generalized stochastic hydrometeorological model for flood and flash flood forecasting, 1: Formulation.” Water Resour. Res., 22(13), 2083–2095.
Georgakakos, K. P., and Bras, R. L. (1982). “Real-time, Statistically-Linearized, Adaptive Flood Routing.” Water Resour. Res., 18(3), 513–524.
Hartmann, H. C., Pagano, T. C., Bales, R., and Sorooshian, S. (2002). “Confidence builders: evaluating seasonal climate forecasts from user perspectives.” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 83(5), 683–698.
Koren, V., Smith, M., Wang, D., and Zhang, Z. (2000). “Use of soil property in the derivation of conceptual rainfall-runoff model parameters.” Proc., Preprints 80th Annual Meeting of the AMS, Long Beach, Calif., American Meteorological Society, Boston.
Lettenmaier, D. P., and Gan, T. Y. (1990). “Hydrologic sensitivities of the Sacramento–San Joaquin River Basin, California, to global warming.” Water Resour. Res., 26(1), 69–86.
Li, P. W., and Lai, E. S. T. (2004). “Short-range quantitative precipitation forecasting in Hong Kong.” J. Hydrol., 288(1), 189–209.
Lohmann, D., et al. (2004). “Streamflow and water balance intercomparisons of four land-surface models in the North American Land Data Assimilation System project.” J. Geophys. Res., 109(D7), D07S91.
Manning, K. W., and Davis, C. A. (1997). “Verification and sensitivity experiments for the WISP94 MM5 forecasts.” Weather Forecast., 12(4), 719–735.
McBride, J. L., and Ebert, E. E. (2000). “Verification of quantitative precipitation forecasts from operational numerical weather prediction models over Australia.” Weather Forecast., 15(1), 103–121.
Mullen, S. L., and Buizza, R. (2001). “Quantitative precipitation forecasts over the United States by the ECMWF ensemble prediction system.” Mon. Weather Rev., 129(4), 638–663.
Murphy, A. H., and Winkler, R. L. (1987). “A general framework for forecast verification.” Mon. Weather Rev., 115(7), 1330–1338.
National Research Council (NRC). (1995). Flood risk management and the American River basin, an evaluation, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
National Weather Service (NWS). (1999a). National Weather Service river forecast system (NWSRFS) user manual. NOAA-National Weather Service, Office of Hydrologic Development, Silver Spring, Md.
National Weather Service (NWS). (1999b). “Sacramento soil-moisture accounting model calibration, demonstration of the interactive approach.” NOAA VHS Training Video Series Produced by HRC, Office of Hydrologic Development, Silver Spring, Md.
Nutter, P. A., and Manobianco, J. (1999). “Evaluation of the 29-km Eta model. Part I: Objective verification at three selected stations.” Weather Forecast., 14(1), 5–17.
Olson, D. A., Junker, N. W., and Korty, B. (1995). “Evaluation of 33years of quantitative precipitation forecasting at the NMC.” Weather Forecast., 10(3), 498–511.
Oreskes, N., Schrader-Frechette, K., and Blittz, K. (1994). “Verification, validation and confirmation of numerical models in the earth science.” Science, 263(5147), 641–646.
Piechota, T. C., Chiew, F. H. S., Dracup, J. A., and McMahon, T. A. (1998). “Seasonal streamflow forecasting in eastern Australia and the El Niño-Southern Oscillation.” Water Resour. Res., 34(11), 3035–3044.
Refsgaard, J. C., and Knudsen, J. (1996). “Operational validation and intercomparison of different types of hydrological models.” Water Resour. Res., 32(7), 2189–2202.
Şen, Z., Altunkaynak, A., and Őzger, M. (2003). “Autorun persistence of hydrologic design.” J. Hydrologic Eng., 8(6), 329–338.
Shamir, E., and Georgakakos, P. K. (2006). “Distributed snow accumulation and ablation modeling in the American River basin.” Adv. Water Resour., 29(4), 558–570.
Shamir, E., Imam, B., Gupta, H. V., and Sorooshian, S. (2005). “Application of temporal streamflow descriptors in hydrologic model parameter estimation.” Water Resour. Res., 41(6), W06021.
Smith, J. A., Day, G. N., and Kane, M. D. (1991). “A non parametric framework for long-range streamflow forecasting.” WMO/TD-428, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Smith, M. B., Laurine, D. P., Koren, V. I., Reed, S. M., and Zhang, Z. (2003). “Hydrologic model calibration in the National Weather Service.” American Geophysical Union Monograph: Advances in model calibration, Q. H. Duan H. V. Gupta, S. Sorooshian, A. N. Rousseau, and R. Turcotte, eds., American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C., 133–152.
Smith, M. B., et al. (2004). “The distributed model intercomparison project (DMIP): Motivation and experiment design.” J. Hydrol., 298(1), 4–26.
Sokol, Z. (2003). “MOS-Based Precipitation Forecasts for River Basins.” Weather Forecast., 18(5), 769–781.
Sorooshian, S., and Dracup, J. A. (1980). “Stochastic parameter estimation procedures for hydrologic rainfall-runoff models: Correlated and heteroscedastic error cases.” Water Resour. Res., 16(2), 430–442.
Sperfslage, J. A., and Georgakakos, K. P. (1996). “Implementation and testing of the HFS operation as part of the National Weather Service river forecast system.” HRC TR 1, Hydrologic Research Center, San Diego.
Tsintikidis, D., Georgakakos, K. P., Sperfslage, J. A., Smith, D. E., and Carpenter, T. M. (2002). “Precipitation uncertainty and raingauge network design within Folsom Lake watershed.” J. Hydrologic Eng., 7(2), 175–184.
Uvo, C. B., and Graham, N. E. (1998). “Seasonal runoff forecast for northern South America: A statistical model.” Water Resour. Res., 34(12), 3515–3524.
Wilks, D. S. (1995). Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences, Academic, New York.
Wilks, D. S. (2000). “Diagnostic verification of the climate prediction center long-lead outlooks, 1995–98.” J. Clim., 13(13), 2389–2403.
World Meteorological Organization (WMO). (1975). “Intercomparison of conceptual models used in operational hydrologic forecasting.” Operational Hydrology Rep. No. 7, Geneva.
World Meteorological Organization (WMO). (1986). “Intercomparison of models of snowmelt runoff.” Operational Hydrology Rep. No. 23, Geneva.
World Meteorological Organization (WMO). (1992). “Simulated real time intercomparison of hydrological models.” WMO Operational Hydrology Rep. No. 38, Geneva.
Xia, Y., Yang, Z. L., Jackson, C., Stoffa, P. L., and Sen, M. K. (2004). “Impacts of data length on optimal parameter and uncertainty estimation of a land surface model.” J. Geophys. Res., 109, D07101.
Yao, H., and Georgakakos, A. P. (2001). “Assessment of Folsom Lake response to historical and potential future scenarios: 2. Reservoir management.” J. Hydrol., 249(1), 176–196.
Yapo, P., Gupta, H. V., and Sorooshian, S. (1996). “Calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models: Sensitivity to calibration data.” J. Hydrol., 181(1), 23–48.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 11Issue 5September 2006
Pages: 392 - 407

History

Received: Nov 9, 2004
Accepted: Jan 19, 2006
Published online: Sep 1, 2006
Published in print: Sep 2006

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Eylon Shamir [email protected]
Post Doctoral Associate, Hydrologic Research Center, 12780 High Bluff Dr., Ste 250, San Diego, CA 92130 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Theresa M. Carpenter [email protected]
Hydrologic Engineer, Hydrologic Research Center, 12780 High Bluff Dr., Ste 250, San Diego, CA 92130. Graduate Student, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, Univ. California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA. E-mail: [email protected]
Peter Fickenscher [email protected]
Hydrologic Forecaster, California–Nevada River Forecast Center, National Weather Service, 3310 El Camino Ave., Sacramento, CA 95821. E-mail: [email protected]
Konstantine P. Georgakakos, M.ASCE [email protected]
Director and Senior Research Scientist, Hydrologic Research Center, 12780 High Bluff Dri., Ste 250, San Diego, CA 92130. Adjunct Professor, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, Univ. California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share